Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, 4thandFive said:

I think we were really really vanilla on purpose and if we win, great, if not, it’s not an SEC game and it probably won’t hurt in the long run. 
 

I don’t like it…but I think Sark only played at 80% today. 

I think that Sark called what Arch was capable of doing.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, LovingBuckeye said:

The real question…

Is Texas the new Alabama?

The real question…

How much of a loser do you have to be to pay money to comment on another school’s board for a week? 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 2
Posted
Just now, Roy Hinojosa said:

At least the O-line wasn't the issue today, I thought they did a really good job.

Which is one major reason why I’m not worried. Texas will only improve from here and our OL & Defense look good. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, LovingBuckeye said:

I think that Sark called what Arch was capable of doing.

Apparently it was not what Arch was capable of. He could throw shovel passes with more accuracy. 

Edited by HookEm
Posted
Just now, 4thandFive said:

Which is one major reason why I’m not worried. Texas will only improve from here and our OL & Defense look good. 

Yeah. I’m frustrated like everyone. But it’s a long year. We had some positives. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
Just now, LovingBuckeye said:

The real question…

Is Texas the new Alabama?

Both teams look 5 - 7 ish today. No 100 yards for Jeremiah Smith, Caleb Downs didn’t look like Travis Hunter, the pass defense for tOSU was cheeks. Quinn would have torn y’all apart. Arch to be nice look like trash most of the time. Defense didn’t make an impact. Our punter was the player of the game.

Posted
Just now, thatdude2 said:

Both teams look 5 - 7 ish today. No 100 yards for Jeremiah Smith, Caleb Downs didn’t look like Travis Hunter, the pass defense for tOSU was cheeks. Quinn would have torn y’all apart. Arch to be nice look like trash most of the time. Defense didn’t make an impact. Our punter was the player of the game.

Quinn had his chance last season lol

Posted

Lost the penalty battle

Lost turnover battle

Stopped twice inside 10. 
We still had a chance. 
I think Arch’s lack of experience showed today. 
not the best game plan at times but again had a chance. 
 

Our D is real, now let’s just continue to grow!

  • Hook 'Em 5
Posted
3 minutes ago, jhookem91 said:

Sark’s smart ass answer about red zone offense earlier this week is really annoying now.  He has a mostly healthy CJ Baxter now and he is still not using him enough in those situations.  

More specific pluses : Gracen Littleton and punter (not going to try and spell his name) 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
1 minute ago, thatdude2 said:

Both teams look 5 - 7 ish today. No 100 yards for Jeremiah Smith, Caleb Downs didn’t look like Travis Hunter, the pass defense for tOSU was cheeks. Quinn would have torn y’all apart. Arch to be nice look like trash most of the time. Defense didn’t make an impact. Our punter was the player of the game.

I only care about being 1-0

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Lock n Horns said:

When ur QB isn’t effective and they don’t have to worry about the pass the red zone gets a lot easier to defend. Should’ve run toss sweep in retrospect

That’s what I was saying. Arch is more effective out in space

Posted

Arch’s inability to hit layup throws ultimately cost us the game. He missed at least 7 that should be gimmes for a starting SEC QB.

Was Sark too conservative early? Probably. But Arch has to hit those throws. Not sure if that’s something that has shown up in camp or if it was just nerves in a huge game on the road. But it has to get better for this to be a playoff team this year.

Defense was incredible as expected. Run game looked solid. OL was very good. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, connorkp23 said:

The real question…

How much of a loser do you have to be to pay money to comment on another school’s board for a week? 

He's just another low class Buckeyes troll.

  • Hook 'Em 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.