Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted 3 hours ago Moderators Posted 3 hours ago Stanford commit on offer watch Offensive line coach Kyle Flood watch Georgetown High OT/IOL and Stanford commit Kaden Scherer Friday night. OTF talked to a source close to the recruitment, and the feedback was Texas has liked what they have seen this season on tape, and in person Friday. OTF is placing the 6-foot-6, 285-pounder on potential "offer watch", and we will not be surprised if an OV is set up the Arkansas game weekend. Scherer picked Stanford over Northwestern and Kansas State after the May-June OV process. He cancelled an OV to Virginia. 21 1 1 Quote
Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted 3 hours ago Author Moderators Posted 3 hours ago Senior HUDL: http://www.hudl.com/v/2Sgsna 3 Quote
Jbro52 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago I like how he finishes blocks and he’s got some nastiness to him 1 Quote
UTexas Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 25 minutes ago, CoachBobbyFinstock said: Why sad Bobby? That’s what I’d like to know as well. Quote
RiisLewis Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago He visited for the Sam Houston game. How would you describe him as a prospect Gerry? Quote
Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted 1 hour ago Author Moderators Posted 1 hour ago 55 minutes ago, Sundancekid said: How many offensive linemen are we taking? Up to 2 more 2 Quote
Ronald Dato Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 4 minutes ago, Gerry Hamilton said: Up to 2 more Does that include portal OL? Quote
Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted 1 hour ago Author Moderators Posted 1 hour ago 11 minutes ago, Ronald Dato said: Does that include portal OL? No. But I would be very cautious as fans thinking Texas going to go retool an OL in the portal. 1 3 Quote
SchoolColors Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Just now, Gerry Hamilton said: No. But I would be very cautious as fans thinking Texas going to go retool an OL in the portal. Why? Quote
Jbro52 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 17 minutes ago, Gerry Hamilton said: Up to 2 more Does that mean we think a commit will not sign with the OL class? Quote
LonghornFan4Ever Posted 56 minutes ago Posted 56 minutes ago 2 minutes ago, Jbro52 said: Does that mean we think a commit will not sign with the OL class? Or does it mean they now have freed up NIL to have a 5 man high school OL class because the staff doesn’t think they will end up with more than 3 high school interior DL players after Berymon’s decommitment and the pressure other schools NIL collectives are putting on their guys to stay put? Quote
SchoolColors Posted 55 minutes ago Posted 55 minutes ago 4 minutes ago, Jbro52 said: Does that mean we think a commit will not sign with the OL class? Max Wright should be processed and likely flipping anyway 3 Quote
Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted 54 minutes ago Author Moderators Posted 54 minutes ago 5 minutes ago, Jbro52 said: Does that mean we think a commit will not sign with the OL class? Not necessarily. Texas would sign five ... from what I heard 2 Quote
Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted 54 minutes ago Author Moderators Posted 54 minutes ago 1 minute ago, SchoolColors said: Max Wright should be processed and likely flipping anyway Texas doesn't want to lose Max Wright 7 Quote
Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted 54 minutes ago Author Moderators Posted 54 minutes ago 7 minutes ago, SchoolColors said: Why? 1. Don't need to. 2. Not how you build the OL program long term. 2 Quote
SchoolColors Posted 53 minutes ago Posted 53 minutes ago Just now, Gerry Hamilton said: Texas doesn't want to lose Max Wright Unfortunate. I don’t view him as a good prospect. Looks like the average we have put out there. Quote
SchoolColors Posted 52 minutes ago Posted 52 minutes ago (edited) 2 minutes ago, Gerry Hamilton said: 1. Don't need to. 2. Not how you build the OL program long term. So we are going to roll into next year with a bad offensive line again? That sounds dumb on Sark. Will we hear again this off season how great the line has looked and them completely no show? Edited 51 minutes ago by SchoolColors Quote
Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted 51 minutes ago Author Moderators Posted 51 minutes ago Just now, SchoolColors said: Unfortunate. I don’t view him as a good prospect. Looks like the average we have put out there. Clemson won two National Titles with what some considered average on the OL. Quote
CoachBobbyFinstock Posted 38 minutes ago Posted 38 minutes ago (edited) I may be alone but I’ll be fairly shocked if Texas doesn’t take a couple of linemen in the portal. You simply cannot replicate what happened this year in Manning’s final season in Austin. Hope is not an answer and that’s what Texas would be doing. Edited 37 minutes ago by CoachBobbyFinstock Quote
justwinbaby Posted 38 minutes ago Posted 38 minutes ago 12 minutes ago, Gerry Hamilton said: Clemson won two National Titles with what some considered average on the OL. Exactly right about the Clemson OL when they were winning national championships. Not all their OL were world beaters, but they played great as a unit. Quote
MBHORNSFAN Posted 38 minutes ago Posted 38 minutes ago (edited) 17 minutes ago, Gerry Hamilton said: 1. Don't need to. 2. Not how you build the OL program long term. Flood is likely gone and Sark is not going to waste another year. We are probably going big in the Portal for OL. IMO zero chance Sark stands pat. Edited 36 minutes ago by MBHORNSFAN 1 Quote
Moderators Jeff Howe Posted 32 minutes ago Moderators Posted 32 minutes ago 2 hours ago, JMarquette said: Guard? I’ve seen him a few times and I don’t know that that’s for sure where he’ll wind up. Regardless, I think he’s a solid prospect and we’ll see what happens with an offer. With football going to 105 full scholarships, you can take a flier on a developmental-type prospect for a spot that otherwise would go to a preferred walk-on. 5 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.