The Perfect College Playoffs

[Kevin C]

Liked a lot of Joel Klatt’s take in support of 24 Team format.   Gaining support from college commissioners (starting with Big 10).   It would make December even better than it already is for CFP imo.

A quick summary of points (my twists on top of Klatt’s overall framework).  https://youtu.be/FcIHsfqD4YI

1. Eliminate conf championship games.   Use regular season conf records (and tie breakers) to name conf champs.   

2. Each of Big 4 conferences get 4 AQ based on conference rules (conf record, head to head, common opponents, etc)

3. ND automatic if Top 20 plus 5th Conf Champ.

4. With 18 Teams locked (17 if ND outside Top 20), the remaining 6 spots at large based on CFP committee voting.  This year that likely would have meant 4 more spots SEC and 2 more for Big 10.

5. CFP Committee determines seeding with heavy emphasis on SoS, SoR, Quality Wins, (motivates tier1 non conf matchups in Sept) 

6. Tuesday following final season games is big announcement of 24-team bracket by CFP Committee.   Second Saturday in Dec is first round of playoffs hosted by 9-16.   Top 8 teams get a bye.   

7. Third weekend of December is Round 2 of CFP hosted by teams ranked 1-8 against winners of round 1.

8. Quarterfinals played at 4 Big Bowl Traditional sites on NewYears (1 game NYE and 3 on NYD).   Same as current format.   Love it.   NewYears back to being spectacular for CFP. 

9. semifinals and championship continue as is.   Not broken.  Why fix?

Love this model for lots of reasons, most importantly:

1) Eliminates conf championship games which are becoming more punitive (champs all lost first round CFP last season)

2) Two rounds of home games hosted at universities.   Both rounds have predictable locations for advanced planning.   
 
3) Allows for heavier inclusion from SEC / Big 10 with at 6 large but keeps heavy emphasis on conference play with 4 AQ per conf. Also, this model rewards playing big boy game in Sept.   This model makes Big12 and ACC more relevant for stability and stop trend of ongoing realignment. 

4) Most of all, it rewards teams getting better through the season and keeps lots of teams interested all season.   Texas is a good example, could come in at 14, host round 1 but on positive trajectory headed into Dec. 

Hook em!! 🧡🐂🤘🏼

Edited 1 hour ago by Kevin C

[Kevin C]

In model proposed, this year…Texas would still have shot at AQ spot with A&M win and likely host round 1 against 3rd or 4th best from Big 12 / ACC.

[TexasMDcoach]

Could also make those second round games slotted into some of the lesser bowl game sites with emphasis on regional locations.  This model would motivate players not to skip the bowl games as well.