jdhdavis

In most cases I recall, fan bases upset at the refs are likely related to missed or non-reviewable calls. This game was odd in that most of the controversy was reviewed. Both teams had reviewed calls go against them but Texas ended up ahead on the strength of the odd forward fumble. The non fumble due to forward progression was wrong. Texas had at least 3 no calls go against them..can’t think of no calls to on Missouri. So in the circumstance of winning reviewed calls I don’t feel at all like we got away with one. Oh and the Miami TD overturn was clearly incomplete. That rule of maintaining possession is enforced more often than not regardless of call on field vs replay. And yes…the SEC should play the audio during replay reviews.

Nice video with Google Earth views, aerial AI, and listing of rank, capacity, national titles, and Heisman winners. Of 12 top stadiums, including DKR, by the end of this year and through the 2023 season, Texas will have played in 9 of the 12--TAMU, LSU, Florida, Georgia, Tenn, Alabama, OSU, Michigan. Only exceptions are UCLA, Penn State, Auburn.

What I saw on replay: Several late drives where the OSU D-line just locked up with our O line but mostly stood there--no effort to push or get by. Landon Tangwall's film study--even shows their #3 give up on the play where Arch scrambles to near goal line. With effort could have hit him pretty good when he turned up the middle.

In its last 3 games, Texas has W’s over Michigan and Ohio State.

The interesting thing about the Carot Top jokes with Norm was that they predate YouTube and social media. So it lived in obscurity as an occasional rerun but took new life with YouTube views years later.

Norm McDonald

I remember 50,000. Just can’t recall when. I also lived through the brief period when Gerry was off the channel. When he returned I had a true feeling that the universe was right again.

We are all #5.

Watched it last night. Great discussion points and don’t disagree with the back and forth. But this time last year we thought everything was good and Conor Stroh or others would mesh with several others. Hope for better this time out. Other observations —Brooks does a lot with a small sample size of plays. Michigan did a lot of D line positioning to confuse assignments. The Houston Texans do this also. But those wide assignments led to the clenching Arch run —Arch did a good job recognizing a bad pocket and making something happen. — Christian Clark had some great blocks on some big players. —Wr drops were certainly bad—several would be explosive plays —in slow motion, Arch made several Db’s look slower —recall we were tied at half. Trailed start of 4th. Turnovers and Arch in 4th won it but very for 3 quarters.

May to July is usually the season of coaches in the Media--or at least the "long format" versions compared with shorter in season availability. Sark made his usual rounds with the various Touchdown clubs, podcast, and media sites. I think he's really good at it. It can be repetitive if you listen to multiple sessions. But he has a lot to say and a lot more than traditional "coach speak." I would give somewhere between a B+ to A-. The only deduction is him having to clarify himself too often--mostly on topics he clearly has thought about and rehearsed and could have self edited better. The player cap space topic is a good example. Of course our rivals ran with that on X with the concept that Texas runs players out of town and has no loyalty. On the Eisen show he clarified that other teams made great offers to some of our players and we declined to match given the other players they wanted to sign from the portal. I give props for him saying this out loud and its of course true that all teams do this. But get that one right in the first place. Before living in Texas, I was in Virginia for a long time and Tony Bennett with their basketball program was, I think, the GOAT for media sessions--always thoughtful, interesting, educational. Too bad he retired early. On the other had, I lived through Bill O'Brien coaching the Houston Texans--the perfect example of coach speak with zero substance. What is your take on high end coaches with the media that make viewing worth our time? Follow-up eval--if having trouble with insomnia, tune into a Dave Aranda press conference--solved..

Just a fun re look, assuming ChatGPT accurate: 2021--Big 12--Bijan Robinson, Keondre Coburn 2022--Big 12--Bijan Robinson, Roschon Johnson, Jordan Whittington, DeMarvion Overshown, Ovie Oghoufo 2023--Big 12--Quinn Ewers, Xavier Worthy, Jordan Whittington, Jaylan Ford, Jahdae Barron 2024--SEC--Quinn Ewers, Kelvin Banks, Jahdae Barron 2025--SEC--Arch Manning, Anthony Hill, Michael Taafe 2026--SEC--Arch Manning, Trevor Goosby, Colin Simmons Great roster of players--especially the group attending more than 1 year. This year's group did well at the mic--clearly trying to be careful and not generate locker room material for opponents. I thought the repeated question on "goosebumps" coming out of the tunnel was a bit silly, but the players managed to give decent answers.

With the “Manning might come back for 2027” comments and the line up behind him, makes you wonder which QBs we will see start between 2027 to 2030 range. Lacy—Bell—Knudsen—Laurence What a great situation to ponder.

Mine: if he was a backup kicker he is suspended and no challenges. Over. per Josh Pate— what if the same problem drops on UT or amy other blueblood, ie high dollar transfer with clean record has same gambling story break 3 mo later. Does the story go differently? I think UT handles it better and the story of Coach Beard may be precedent that they can make difficult decisions even if winning changes hurt in short term. Other blue bloods may go down similar path to tech. Curious what others think.

Brutal analysis--only 4 of 30 finished at TA&M For UT 2022--the first full class for Sark--looks like they finished 9: Campbell, Banks, Blue, Guilbeau, Hutson, Burke, Williams, Robertson, St Louis. Seemed like more in real time but a lot of attrition still. Wonder what the ongoing norm will be for 4 years at 1 school--maybe a third at best.

You would think 4th and goal would be a sore topic for him:

Saban used to sell recruits the value of developing in the early years with elite and developed athletes going to the NFL. Now the temptation is to go to lesser ranked programs to play earlier and get paid, but practicing against a lower tier of teammates with the hope of transferring up in later years. Will be a challenge to compare which model works best for the NFL.

Bellaire, Texas Weekends--Lake Conroe DKR Weekends--East Austin KOA in the Airstream!

My observation is that its 2 issues and not just drops. The other is he has a very thin resume at making truly contested catches where there is contact but excluding PI (or even "missed PI). Once there is legal contact, he seems to be out of the play more often than not.

How do you see the LB rotation today? More Bo Barnes?

I don't speak Spanish, but the highlights are awesome. https://fb.watch/C-S6kkQyg0/

Of course the question will be at what point in the draft is a yearly contract lower than a player’s NIL potential as a 4th or 5th year in college.

True. Still he had some 2-3 round predictions in the teams need qbs argument. But this year not so many compared to last year.

Specific to the Longhorns and rounds 1-3, the NFL teams certainly rewarded several players who came back to finish eligibility--Baron, Broughton, Collins, Mukuba. Leaving early--worked out for Banks and Golden Not working out for a high pick--Ewers, Blue, Williams, Bond (other issues). Probably Williams ends up being the biggest mistake and wondering if this affects future year decisions. Completed eligibility and did their best--Helm, Sorrell, Majors, Conner, Gbenda, Bolden, Holmes, Norton. Hoping for a good Saturday for the group. Plenty of time for this group to do well in the league despite draft status.

I guess the OMG moment was not a pick/reach, but the Sanders slide.

Everyone loves mock drafts. But every year there is a (usually 1st round) pick that stuns the experts and throws multiple team boards into disarray. Then becomes the headline of next day draft grades. I can never predict the first major “reach.” Thoughts ?