Jump to content

Bwells

Supporters
  • Posts

    27
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Bwells

  • Birthday 10/17/1967

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Bwells's Achievements

Freshman

Freshman (1/9)

  • Collaborator
  • One Month Later
  • Week One Done
  • Dedicated
  • Conversation Starter

Recent Badges

41

Reputation

  1. If Eli and Peyton had the athletic capability of arch, would they have been just a pure pocket passer? how much better could they have been and their Hall of Famers.
  2. How much of the struggles Arch is having is contributable to the offensive line. Meaning, DC’s throwing blitz packages at Arch, one would assume creates havoc at the offensive line more than usual. Will continue until Arch proves he’ll make them pay for it. I read where Tx is blitzed more than any team in SEC right now. Blood in the water!
  3. Perhaps this is a question for Bobby CJ or Jerry. When you have a quarterback, that’s obviously as talented as arch and they’re not seeing the field and they’re hanging on the ball too long. How is that coached? Because he is obviously not progressing and they surely know that’s one of the issues. That’s the head scratcher. With arch’s lineage, Sark and his uncles you think there would be a lot of coaching going on and some level of progression, but we obviously don’t see it..
  4. Assuming it runs on gas with a lot of water in the tank and no brakes.
  5. Is it something relevant that CJ Baxter is now gaining 5.6 yards carry versus having 3.6 while he was at Texas. Is that scheme? Is it the line or a pretty heavy mixture of both? I would assume more heavily waited towards the offensive line not being able to execute. It seems like Texas paints a picture and ask the team to execute it and you look at Alabama or Georgia and they state here’s where we’re gonna run, show us you can stop it. That’s the difference in the physicality. I think we’re not seeing..
  6. I think Sark may be coaching Arch toward the quarterback he wants him to become instead of calling the offense around the quarterback Arch is right now. Sounds like the most treasonable explanation.
  7. Teams have a blueprint for how to beat Texas. Stack the box, apply different pressure packages because they know arch isn’t gonna run , now he’s standing like a statue in the pocket. He had five rushing touchdowns this time last year, he has zero now. His legs used to be a weapon, that’s been taken away from him. Other teams see that, now they can be more aggressive wit blitz packages. They know arch will occasionally hit the long pass downfield, but so inconsistent. They’re rolling the dice and it’s worth it. Since Texas leads the SEC in no converting third down conversions, they’re not able to play complementary football, so the defense is on the field extensively longer than they should be and tiring down in the third and fourth quarter as we saw against Oklahoma, as they were able to start running the ball and getting passes connected for longer gains because of less pressure.
  8. I don’t think this is all on Arch. A big part of the issue is how Sark is using him. Last year Arch was much more dangerous as a dual-threat QB through the first five games he had about 160 rushing yards and 5 rushing TDs. This year he’s around 100 yards with no rushing TDs. That’s a significant change in how defenses have to account for him. Against a defense like Oklahoma that blitzes heavily, I thought Texas would use more QB movement, RPOs, zone read and designed runs to punish that aggression. Instead, Arch spent a lot of time being asked to sit in the pocket and process pressure, which is probably the weakest part of his game When the offense keeps going three-and-out, the defense is right back on the field. Texas having stretches where they couldn’t sustain drives, their defense started wearing down combined with Arches two brutal fourth-quarter mistakes. I think the bigger question is whether Sark is tailoring the offense to what Arch does best right now or trying to force him into the quarterback he wants him to become. To me, defenses are not having to defend all of him. You would think that sark what design six 6 or eight purposeful carries, more movement of the pocket, more RPOs and fewer static obvious-passing situations and that would make the entire offense harder to defend.
  9. 31d_f09ae221-bd82-4ee7-82ae-25d2b826228a.mp4
  10. Would Texas be interested or going after him?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.