southpaw

First of all, I agree that Belichick rode Brady's coattails. Your statement above is correct, although your premise is stronger if you point out Belichick is 19-1 with Brady on the team and 2-7 without him. By the way, the "1" was in Brady's rookie season when he didn't sniff the field and Bledsoe was the starting QB. And in Brady's second year, Bedsoe got injured and only played in two games - both were losses. Brady took over and led them to the first Super Bowl win. When you look at it that way, it accentuates your original premise.

I absolutely agree with this.

I guess reading comprehension is a challenge for you. The last sentence literally says it's not good. But it sure as hell isn't the 2-27 that was stated in the post I responded to. I don't have a problem with the premise. It's valid. But the 2 out of 29 statement is blatantly wrong.

Bias much? Belichick was not a head coach for 29 years without Tom Brady. That's a bullshit statement. Belichick was only a NFL head coach for a TOTAL of 29 years, and 20 of them were with the Patriots coming while Tom Brady was also there. So, Belichick and Brady were together for 20 of Belichick's 29 years as a head coach. He had a winning record in 2 of the remaining seasons (1-4 with the Browns and 1-3 with the Patriots). Not good, but not the incorrect BS you wrote.

With the exception of SEC regular season finish, Vandy wins all the metrics comparisons. I think the aggy at D1 has it correct.

Not Jeff, but I think it has to do with the # of times each team has been the home team. Michigan was visitor in game 1 against UCF and Texas was home team against Eastern Illinois. By default, Michigan was home team against Texas. If both teams were home in their first games, it gets a bit murkier for me. I've been told two different answers on that. One was that higher seed would be home, as in the first round games. The other was that it would be a coin flip. Don't know that answer on that.

And that appears to be why the judge has a problem with it... for the current members of football and other sports who would get shut out by the lower limits

@Jeff Howe Any reason stated for the change? Weather doesn't look like an issue, except for possibly Sunday. Parking all weekend will be screwed with softball in town against L$U and games that start before baseball.

It sucks. All of it.

Where does he park it?

I think all of the loud and unfiltered a$m interest being reported was Beard and his agents putting pressure on Ole Miss to raise their commitment to Beard and the program. a$m did as predicted and was supposedly going to offer another dumb big-$$$ contract. Ole Miss blinked. Beard stays in Oxford. That was always the script, imo.

EVERYTHING in the program will be up to the new guy. It's up to him to decide if he wants Ogden (or anybody else in the program) to stay.

Zero U is a mutual rival, a$m is an annoying and underachieving little brother. There was no way either UT or Zero U would split from each other during conference realignment. a$m ran away, then threw a tantrum when the UT and Zero U announcement was made.

Never gonna happen. Texas will not hire a head coach who currently has a show cause enforcement against him until June 2025. Even if it was over this past December (it wasn't/isn't), they wouldn't hire him.

Only reason I'm still there is the free Paramount+ sub.