All Activity
- Past hour
-
And I live in Wichita Falls if you need a reporter who has no idea what he is doing. 😂
-
Do You Still Consider Nebraska a Blue Blood?
harveycmd replied to CJ Vogel's topic in On Texas Football Forum
Of the eight blue blood football programs (Alabama, Ohio State, Texas, USC, Michigan, Criminal Sooners, Notre Dame and Nebraska), only the criminals, altar boys and corn guys haven't won a title in the last twenty-five years. That's why Nebraska is just as much of a blue blood as the other two. -
Do You Still Consider Nebraska a Blue Blood?
Bobby Burton replied to CJ Vogel's topic in On Texas Football Forum
Their move to the Big 10 was super ill-conceived. Much like Arkansas' early move to the SEC. Both schools became outposts for their new conferences. It hasn't worked for Nebraska and Arkansas has never been the same since. -
Do You Still Consider Nebraska a Blue Blood?
Joe Zura replied to CJ Vogel's topic in On Texas Football Forum
Yes -
Do You Still Consider Nebraska a Blue Blood?
LonghornFan4Ever replied to CJ Vogel's topic in On Texas Football Forum
I would say yes because I think you can't lose blueblood status once you're considered one. But another decade similar to the one they just had and it's safe to say they will never return to being a perennial powerhouse like Minnesota football pre-1960, Indiana men's basketball, Southern Cal baseball, etc. Maybe they find a Curt Cignetti 2.0 to revive their program down the road, so I gonna count them out completely. -
Do You Still Consider Nebraska a Blue Blood?
CJ Vogel replied to CJ Vogel's topic in On Texas Football Forum
Now that's a bit bold. I certainly would have OU in my blue blood class. Wasn't about six years ago they had won seven straight conference titles -
Do You Still Consider Nebraska a Blue Blood?
Bunk Moreland replied to CJ Vogel's topic in On Texas Football Forum
I’m not even sure I consider OU a blue blood anymore, so no. -
Texas Tech and Sorsby have no shame.
hookem1014 replied to Roy Hinojosa's topic in On Texas Football Forum
This would set a disastrous legal precedence for the NCAA if it happens -
Do You Still Consider Nebraska a Blue Blood?
Deej replied to CJ Vogel's topic in On Texas Football Forum
They are 2-34 against top 25 teams in the CFP era. They are Purdue with a better history -
Texas makes the top four for LB target Toa Satele
Bobby Burton replied to Jordan Scruggs's topic in On Texas Football Forum
Nansen is a Hawaii native, too. -
You forgot to mention he is Kyle Floods biggest fan.
-
Do You Still Consider Nebraska a Blue Blood?
harveycmd replied to CJ Vogel's topic in On Texas Football Forum
They are as much of a blue blood as the criminal sooners or Notre Dame altar boys. -
OTF Premium Sports card talk
Quinncent McManning, Jr. replied to Hank South's topic in On Texas Football Forum
VY and Ricky have nice ones. The younger players these days tend to not. I was going to pick up a jt sanders card but the autograph was just laughable. -
Do You Still Consider Nebraska a Blue Blood?
CJ Vogel replied to CJ Vogel's topic in On Texas Football Forum
-
Do You Still Consider Nebraska a Blue Blood?
CJ Vogel replied to CJ Vogel's topic in On Texas Football Forum
-
OTF Premium Call your shot -- Spurs or Thunder
GoHorns1 replied to Hank South's topic in On Texas Football Forum
Spurs in 6! -
Saw this on r/CFB this morning and figured I would share it with the good folks of OTF. Is Nebraska still considered to be a blue blood in your eyes? Couple of Nebraska facts: – Last National Title: 1997 – Last Conference Title: 1999 – Ten win seasons since 2000: 6 – Average wins in the last decade: 4.7 per season – Nebraska hasn't won eight games in a single season since 2016. – Nebraska hasn't won ten games in a single season since 2012. – 51–64 overall record in the last ten years. Have not finished ranked in the top 25 for a single season. Of course the history is there, but the program could have completely wrapped up after 2000 and the trophy case would not have changed a single bit. So, what say you? Nebraska still belong in the blue blood conversation?
-
Texas Tech and Sorsby have no shame.
Jeff05 replied to Roy Hinojosa's topic in On Texas Football Forum
“The filing includes Sorsby's betting on events he didn't follow such as the Turkish basketball league and Romanian soccer matches. "To be clear, I never placed any bets 'against' Indiana or against any players on the team," Sorsby said in the included affidavit. "I never used any non-public information that I knew about the team in deciding what bets to place. My bets were purely intended to make me feel more connected to the game and my teammates and to give me more of a reason to root for my teammates. Because the Indiana football team was not a very strong competitor in 2022, I lost most of the bets I placed.” -
Texas Tech and Sorsby have no shame.
Jeff05 replied to Roy Hinojosa's topic in On Texas Football Forum
Not any school would do this. You get out of your investment and cut your losses. You don’t stay attached. -
Texas Tech and Sorsby have no shame.
Gerry Hamilton replied to Roy Hinojosa's topic in On Texas Football Forum
Every Texas Tech coach, member of the program and big money booster should be really ashamed to have any part in this. How many speeches have Joey McGuire and his staff given to high school kids and parents, and college kids over the years on team, culture, doing the right things, etc… I really like McGuire, he always been awesome to me for well over a decade, but it’s truly pathetic and height of hypocrisy if he or his staff are supporting this attempt at eligibility after betting on his own team at Indiana. -
Interview with some older champions, Ted Koy, Billy Dale, David McWilliams, etc.
-
Welcome Jordan Scruggs to OTF!
Gerry Hamilton replied to Bobby Burton's topic in On Texas Football Forum
-
Texas Tech and Sorsby have no shame.
harveycmd replied to Roy Hinojosa's topic in On Texas Football Forum
Most of the eligibility cases have been in state courts for reasons I won't get into because it would take a while to explain. I haven't looked at the jurisdictional specifics in this case, but I must presume the monetary transactions that constitute at least some of the bets involve interstate commerce and therefore immediately results in federal priority. Epistemically speaking, this is an a priori matter. While there's no specific mention of competitive sports in the Constitution, it's undeniable that allowing players to gamble on games in which the participate would make competitive sports untenable, which is why every sports league or group does not allow it. -
CBS Sports CFB most complete rosters
Joe Zura replied to Gerry Hamilton's topic in On Texas Football Forum
I stopped reading when it said we have multiple first rounders on the OL Gerry lol -
I would gladly do that over what I’m doing now lol