All Activity

https://www.theplayerstribune.com/matthew-mcconaughey-ncaa-football-ut-texas-longhorns

Fall for that nonsense at your own peril. He playing games with his team and motivating them to listen to him

I'm not picking against Trinidad ... when the QB on the other side isn't making basic QB plays and reads. Maybe it changes Saturday, but that's how bad its been.

Let me help you write Sunday’s article, one word four letters: NOPE

I’d lean Ole Miss in a close one, mainly because Texas has looked too dependent on the defense keeping games manageable. If Texas avoids the early mistakes and gets anything from the offense, it could stay tight into the fourth quarter. I’m not confident enough to call a blowout either way. When I’m comparing outside predictions, I usually check whether someone has a real record instead of judging one confident score. The public results at https://matchterminal.org/tipsters are useful for comparing settled net units, ROI, and losses before taking any pick seriously.

All great stuff Jeff, Appreciate the analytics and all your hard work. If I can add a couple of things, as bad as the OLine has been they have: 1) improved Arch's protection time in the pocket from last year to over 3 seconds - that is a huge plus 2) the sacks that gets credited to the OLine can be differentiated to an actual QB sack for 2a) holding the ball to long 2b) for not throwing the ball away 2c) not actually improving and running for yardage. In addition the 3rd key point is: coverage sacks whereby WRs have not created separation and have been well covered. And finally the 4th point is a Play Called by Sark against a Defensive Play Called (DC) that does not work out; for example, a blitz trumps a bad offensive play call. A long slow developing route against a particular Defensive Play Call results in failure. So, as bad as The OLine is and gets dinged, there are other factors that contribute to that Group's short comings and weakness. At the end of the day, the question is: Is it the OLine individual players or The OLine schemes designed by The Coaching Staff? If one is in Tony Hills Camp - must listen to this past Wednesday Hump Day with Hills - I submit that one can change any personnel you want or mix the combination of current personnel, but until you change the schemes there will be no difference in outcomes. Tony Hills does a terrific articulation of the real world in the trenches during mid season play. Must Listen on C&F. Personally, I remember MeMa telling me when I was growing up that I was to smart for my own good. MeMa was always right. I think Sark and His Offensive Staff is to smart for their own good. They are implementing Pro like schemes that Collegiate Players obviously can't process, comprehend and execute. Furthermore, Sark's Play Call Sheet doesn't apply to The College Game, it is more suitable for The NFL. Hey Sark, are you building a resume for a job in The NFL? Are you putting on tape schemes that would be effective, productive and efficient in The NFL? Just curious. Just a question. Hook'em!!!

Seymore had a PFF rating of 82.6 for pass protection.Only 1 sack and 1 penalty in 840 snaps. But not in the conversation. Why?

Retaining Kyle Flood to keep Goosby another year really ended up being the worst possible outcome.

LOL

The problem is you’re sticking a fork in the season too. You can make any OL changes you want after this weekend if we lose. None of the changes will matter until sark fires flood or gets canned himself.

This is it for the Texas offensive line under Kyle Flood, IMO. A performance on Saturday like their last three and it'll be time to stick a fork in the group as it stands. Or maybe they turn things around with their backs against the wall. We'll see tomorrow.

It’s time to tackle “One Burning Question,” an On Texas Football in-season feature where we’ll examine a question facing the Texas Longhorns as they enter a game. On Sunday, we’ll revisit the question to see whether Steve Sarkisian’s team answered it successfully. This week, with No. 19 Texas (4-2, 1-2 SEC) welcoming No. 7 Ole Miss (5-1, 3-1) to Royal-Texas Memorial Stadium on Saturday (6:30 p.m., ABC), the question is: With the season on the line, can the offensive line come through? There have been times throughout the first six games of the season when the offensive line has done its job. While the flashes have been few and far between, Kyle Flood’s group makes things happen when they’re on the same page and execute Sarkisian's calls. The fleeting moments of quality trench play aren’t what Texas fans had in mind when Sarkisian and Flood set out to rebuild the offensive line after the 2025 season. Considering how the Longhorns overcame a rough start to the transfer portal cycle and landed two players targeted by other SEC programs (Melvin Siani and Dylan Sikorski) and added depth when Laurence Seymore was granted another season of eligibility, the situation up front is worse than it was last season. Traditional statistics tell an unsavory story. Texas is tied for 121st in FBS in sacks allowed (2.83 per game), is tied for 135th in tackles for loss allowed (7.8 per game) and is on pace for the program’s lowest output in points per game (30.2) and yards per play (5.45) since 2017. The 362.3 yards per game (No. 92 nationally) the Longhorns are averaging is on pace to be the worst season for total offense on the Forty Acres since 2014 (Shawn Watson’s offense averaged 337.3 yards per game). Texas enters Saturday’s game against the Rebels ranked 101st nationally in rushing yards per game (136) and 120th in yards per carry (3.64). The Longhorns haven’t run the football with this little success since the 2002 offense averaged 135.5 yards per game on the ground, an average buoyed by Cedric Benson’s 1,293-yard sophomore season. Advanced statistics don’t put the Texas offense in a flattering light either. Line yards per carry measures an offensive line's effectiveness through weighted yardage. The offensive line is credited with 120 percent of the negative yards on running back carries stopped behind the line of scrimmage and 100 percent on carries that gain 0-4 yards. Texas is 115th out of 138 FBS offensive lines. The Longhorns are 97th nationally in stuff rate, which calculates the percentage of rushing plays stopped at or behind the line of scrimmage. Power success rate is the percentage of third- and fourth-down runs with two or fewer yards to go that result in a first down or a touchdown. Texas is No. 98 in the country, with 69.4 percent of its runs moving the chains or reaching the end zone in those situations, The offensive line isn’t solely to blame for the offense’s struggles. Still, things won’t improve if an ailing backfield that could be without Hollywood Smothers (shoulder) on Saturday doesn’t have room to operate and the quarterback (whether it’s Arch Manning or KJ Lacey) is under constant duress. The group can’t fade in the second half as they did in last Saturday’s 27-24 loss to Florida. After racking up 114 yards on 18 non-sack rushing attempts in the first half, Texas netted just 14 yards on seven non-sack rushing attempts after halftime. Those seven carries included Smothers losing three yards on third-and-1 on the offense’s first possession of the third quarter, Raleek Brown getting dropped for a 2-yard loss on the first play of the next series and Manning losing three yards while trying to run for a first down on a fourth-and-2 at the 8:30 mark of the fourth quarter. There’s a chance Sarkisian and Flood will make personnel changes for the Ole Miss game. They could stand pat and hope Saturday is the day when everything comes together. Regardless, if the Longhorns can’t move the chains and limit the time that Trinidad Chambliss and the Rebels’ potent offense are on the field, things could get out of hand. The offensive line is out of time to figure things out. It’s now or never for a unit that’s fallen woefully short of the most measured preseason expectations through six games. View full news story

There is nothing in college sports that gets shut down that can't potentially be opened up again in a court room. And I literally mean nothing. Until there's some kind of federal legislation - and this is not me being a proponent of the bill that the Senate passed - which gives the NCAA some kind of antitrust protection and creates a body of law around college sports - then every rule put in place by the NCAA is subject to litigation. In fact, every court ruling is subject to litigation, such as what we've seen with the competing lawsuits in Louisiana versus federal court in the battle between the SEC and LSU. The problem with federal legislation is that they're always going to give you more help than you wanted or needed. There's no way the current legislature in a political climate today is going to be able to come up with a common sense way to address college sports. It's always going to be agenda filled, creating as many problems as it solves. But that's how it all works. Or doesn't work, depending on perspective.

Sarkisian vs Arch Sarkisian HC vs Sarkisian OC 🤣

Watched the story on tv last night. Was in Alien - I had forgotten that one. Great actor. RIP.

Some of us have been watching similar dramas for a several decades now. I have the sense that we better, and should win big tomorrow night. All our coaches should be coaching like their hair is on fire, and our players should be playing with a fire in their bellies. Heaven help Sark if we lose, we've put up with a lot of bs in the past, but we never put up with it for long.

A river runs through it he did a season on Cheers.

Viper!

1. Texas The two-time defending champs return most of their core from their 2026 roster, including Teagan Kavan and SEC Player of the Year Katie Stewart. While the Longhorns lost Reese Atwood and Leighann Goode to the professional ranks, the transfer additions of Isa Torres, the reigning ACC Player of the Year, and Samantha Swan should fill those voids. Texas needs an arm or two to rise up behind Kavan, but they have plenty of options, including freshman Madi Doty. 2. Alabama 3. Texas Tech 4. Florida 5. Oklahoma 6. Tennessee 7. Georgia 8. Arkansas 9. Texas A&M 10. Florida State 11. Mississippi State 12. Nebraska 13. UCLA 14. Virginia Tech 15. LSU 16. Oklahoma State 17. UCF 18. Grand Canyon 19. Clemson 20. Stanford 21. Oregon 22. Arizona 23. Duke 24. South Florida 25. Washington https://www.on3.com/softball/news/way-too-early-softball-america-top-25-rankings/

I know they are pretty much the only "people" that are "grading" things for CFB, but they are simply incorrect. For example, this year after one of A&M's only wins PFF said Marcel Reed had zero "turnover worthy" plays. I watched that game and Marcel Reed through a ball directly into both hands of a DB who just happened to completely drop it. Pretty sure that is a turnover worthy play. PFF is a complete joke and idk if they use AI or just straight up make things up based off of names and results.

RIP Mike "Viper" Metcalf

27-9 Texas

Texas is probably the favorite on paper. Which is great news because I've watched enough Texas sports lately to know the championship game will not, in fact, be played on paper. Texas, OU, and Tech all look loaded. OU is still OU. Tech bought enough players to qualify as a small nation. Texas brought back stars and loaded up through the portal. The only thing I've learned from the football and volleyball seasons is that whenever I hear "this roster is stacked," I immediately start looking for the nearest emergency exit. For now I'm choosing optimism. By February I'll be booking my WCWS hotel. By April I'll be questioning every coaching decision. By May I'll be convinced we're winning it all again. The annual Texas fan migration pattern remains undefeated. 😂