All Activity

That's great. You do you. My colleagues do great work.

Make no mistake about this: I usually don't.

Was probably the most underachieving program at Texas. Change long overdue

Nobody is forcing you to read it.

It feels like Texas is the team that needs to be all-in after coming up short. Hope it goes more like it did for Ohio State last season and not Penn State this season. It's up to Sark to push the right buttons.

Tired of your weak reporting.

we really need better designation on why players decide to leave a program. Was this truly a de-commitment? Or did Bama withdraw their offer? Or did he get a better offer somewhere closer to home? I guess in the latter case, it's actually a de-commitment. Just more and more, players leave a program because they effectively got cut, and it should be reported as such. We're no longer dealing with "good kids that play an armature sport". We're talking about fully paid professionals here. More importantly, are we in play?

Yet you felt the need to comment. Cool.

But as I said, what I read is that he was found to have done no wrong doing in a court of law? Was that before or after the texts leaked?

Doesn't mean much in this context.

No more corn dogs and mayo for you Herry. One can dream for Richard Anderson

Do we pursue?!

Guys - let's direct all this angst towards aggy next Friday. 🤘

just gotta look into his texts that leaked and that says everything. Even if he was the scapegoat he still knew what was going on and took the money over doing the right thing.

Okay and? That has nothing to do with what I said lol.

I don't have a problem with the hire, don't have a dog in the fight, so to speak. From what I've read about the situation, wasn't he found to have no wrong doing in a court of law? I mean the University is the one who covered it up and they pretty much got a slap on the wrist and kept it pushing. Briles is the one who bore the brunt of the punishment and was scapegoated, along with several other key figures. In saying all that, he deserves a chance at redemption and should be heavily monitored. That's just what I've read about the situation, so I could be wrong.

Rehash of the press conference already covered across the internet.

The program was coming off a 5-7 season when Ewers made his first start; no one was talking about a national title at that point. When Arch took over we were ranked #1 in preseason polls and it was national title or bust. That a Grand Canyon of difference between where Arch took over and when Ewers took over.

Yeah but Arkansas' D is flat out terrible lol. It didn't look good the previous week against a Georgia team that isn't that good defensively.

Well, does he also have better weapons around him? That's important, too. Compared to the last couple of years, there is a significant drop in talent with the previous guys to these guys.

Not to try and compare too much, but he's also statistically having a better first year starting than Ewers, although Ewers was younger when he first started. I'm proud of the way he's battled through the season. Now we just hope Sark can put the pieces around him to elevate to the next level.

Does this version of Arch with last year’s defense with the title?

FWIW, Arch is 10-3 as a starter. That's the same record Colt McCoy had after 13 starts and he's one game behind Vince Young (11-2) in win-loss record through 13 starts. He's also 7-0 at home and has an 8-0 record in games played inside the state of Texas.