All Activity

At the 8:40 mark, Cody Campbell makes the statement: "They(Texas Tech) have a contract to not only pay him, but to play him. So how do we not play a kid when we're contractually obligated to do so and a court has ruled that he's eligible to play?" Maybe I'm flat out wrong but it would be shocking to me if NIL agreements actually contained provisions requiring a player to be given playing time. Coaches make lineup decisions all the time, and I can't imagine a contract legally obligating a school to put a specific player on the field.

You can’t make this up.

Stewart was NEVER leaving 1st base.

Amazing!!

Hammond must be catastrophically bad in your head if you’re ready to blow, like you said, $6M on a one‑year rental who couldn’t even keep a job at Indiana. That’s not “building a roster.” That’s flailing.

🤡

Stewie recruited as a catcher?

What?!?!

Best compliment ever!!

This was actually said

but when you have atwood, other Catchers aren't gonna wanna come and sit for 2-3 years.

Atwood was probably the reason.

Atwood was the year before, I just want to know if she was offered out of high school.

Great Freakin News!!!! 3 peat chances are climbing !!!!!

Atwood

Curious, was she not offered out of high school?

That keeps Stewart at first base!

The dangerous fallacy in all this is Tech’s separation of the disease from Sorsby’s responsibility for his actions. It’s a completely enabling mindset. If an alcoholic kills someone while driving under the influence, they don’t get to escape the consequences because of their addiction.

They beat Abilene Christian by 1 point the last time the played. Wouldn't be shocked if Tech struggles with the weight of the college football world on their shoulders. I wouldn't be shocked if Tech has a really bad season, JV Joey isn't the type of coach that is going to rally the troops when things go bad.

Catalon for me too I think. He did well at Mizzou after Texas.

"How would I approach this situation with my own son?" Well if you approached it by telling your son he doesn't have to take responsibility for your actions like you're approaching it for Sorsby, you would be a bad father raising an unaccountable son. Ball's in your court.

The funniest thing ever would be for Sorsby to be charged with gambling across state lines and not be able to play because of that!

1) Texas Tech didn't fund the lawsuit? Did Texas Tech pay Sorsby millions in Texas Tech Cafeteria dine in credits or USD? 2) There actually is an absolutely perfect solution: Sorsby doesn't play another down of college football. The only ones that don't think so are those with rooting interests in Texas Tech.

Not a bad watch, it does have some edits(about 4 within the first 12mins)Kinda wonder what was edited out and why. Also there is a comment on it that makes me wonder, is there possibly any crimes they are looking into.