All Activity
- Past hour
-
Down with the God King Steve Sarkisian
Shmatt replied to whereiend's topic in On Texas Football Forum
Sark is good but just needs to adapt more instead of staying stubborn. If he can adapt than he will be fine. If he can’t adjust then this conversation will hold a lot more weight next year. Arch and Sark seem to be tied to the hip, plus if im an NFL team Sark has done nothing to prove he can be anything but an OC at the NFL level, his teams have been too up and down for the level of talent on the field. This year has been disappointing for sure, but Sark leaving this specific year would be worse for the program than better. Of course if his heart isn’t in it or does have one foot out the door than we should look elsewhere. But for better or for worse, Sark is the guy in charge. -
OTF Premium Recruiting - could be some interesting news
Chinadoll10 replied to Bobby Burton's topic in On Texas Football Forum
Taking y’all a while to diagnose Carlton is flipping. -
Down with the God King Steve Sarkisian
Detroithorn92 replied to whereiend's topic in On Texas Football Forum
You clearly don’t remember the Charlie Strong Era. The grass isn’t always greener…. -
I see a lot of stuff written about, will we get in the playoffs at 9-3 when the talk should be, we need to worry about not going 7-5. Plenty of football to play in the next 2 weeks. We better bring it.
- Yesterday
-
OTF Premium Recruiting - could be some interesting news
Hornsdxx replied to Bobby Burton's topic in On Texas Football Forum
I miss her -
OTF Premium Recruiting - could be some interesting news
Realist Horn replied to Bobby Burton's topic in On Texas Football Forum
Does the delay have anything to do with the Sark rumors? -
Down with the God King Steve Sarkisian
SchoolColors replied to whereiend's topic in On Texas Football Forum
Starting 5 at beginning of the year: Goosby - 3rd year Stroh - 3rd year Hutson - 4th year Campbell - 4th year Baker - 2nd year 5 star, was expected to contribute early Neto - 4th year Facts -
the bare minimum moving forward is CFP. If you don’t make the CFP the season is a failure because that means no chance at a title. National championships is always the goal. Those are two facts. That is the expectations for Texas. When those are no longer the expectations then we have failed as a program.
-
Down with the God King Steve Sarkisian
whereiend replied to whereiend's topic in On Texas Football Forum
Eh, Sark failed big time as a GM not upgrading OL in the portal. He then failed big time as an OC not deploying an offensive style that can survive with subpar OL play. He frankly failed as a HC in putting so much faith in Kyle Flood. Why is he failing at so many different aspects of his job? I think it's simply that he is one man (and likely one man with a stressful personal life) and he doesn't have enough time and energy to do three full time jobs. It's not excusable to take on too much work and then fail to deliver. He needs to do a better job of delegating responsibility. (Or CDC needs to do it for him). -
I like Sark and I don't want him gone as our coach. I just think he can't be championship level HC, OC, and GM at the same time. At the absolute minimum he needs and OC, and I'd prefer an independent personnel department as well.
-
Down with the God King Steve Sarkisian
Steamboat Willie replied to whereiend's topic in On Texas Football Forum
Fair point, but let’s be accurate about what these OL guys are. Sark didn’t inherit them — he recruited most of them — but they weren’t recruited to be instant-impact, SEC-level frontline starters. They were taken as developmental depth pieces, guys you hope turn into contributors in Year 3 or 4, not anchors of the line. And that’s exactly the issue right now: Texas is having to start players who were originally projected as long-term depth because the higher-ceiling recruits (the Banks/Campbell/Brockermeyer era guys) either left early, got hurt, didn’t develop fast enough, or didn’t fill out the pipeline the way it ideally should’ve progressed. You can criticize Sark’s offensive roster build — that’s fair. But it’s not fair to pretend he walked into a stocked pantry and somehow burned the ingredients. The truth is he built the OL room with a mix of big hits and long-term projects, and now those “projects” are being thrown into starting roles earlier than planned. That’s why it looks messy right now. Not because he inherited a disaster, and not because he’s a “God King” micromanager — but because Texas is asking depth-grade players to play SEC-grade roles. Big difference. -
OTF Premium Recruiting - could be some interesting news
drag worm replied to Bobby Burton's topic in On Texas Football Forum
We could use a little boost of momentum around here. -
Down with the God King Steve Sarkisian
SchoolColors replied to whereiend's topic in On Texas Football Forum
Poor Quinn 😞 -
Down with the God King Steve Sarkisian
LTWOTIMES replied to whereiend's topic in On Texas Football Forum
I'm not sure we can say that. The model produced back to back semi final appearances. 10 games in with a first year starting QB and now we need to change everything. I'm not there -
Down with the God King Steve Sarkisian
whereiend replied to whereiend's topic in On Texas Football Forum
It's the portal era, though. Throwing away a season with an inexperienced QB and OL is mismanagement. As Gerry often says there is no longer an excuse for being young. -
Down with the God King Steve Sarkisian
whereiend replied to whereiend's topic in On Texas Football Forum
I'm a massive fan of Sark as a pre-portal/NIL coach. But I think his model is outdated and isn't going to win championships going forward. Roster management in the portal era is a full time job. Coordinating an offense and staying at the top of the game is a full time job. Being a head coach is a full time job. Sark isn't Superman and can't do all of these at an elite level. As long as he tries we will be second place to the programs that do a better job of delegating responsibility. -
Down with the God King Steve Sarkisian
akrupa23 replied to whereiend's topic in On Texas Football Forum
I do think changes need to be made, and I’m hopeful Sark makes the right calls whatever they may be. But thinking this was a natty contender team with a virtually brand new line and a new starting QB seems naive in hindsight. I remember in the offseason a good chunk of the community (and I’m pretty sure Bobby explicitly said it too) talking about 2026 really being the year. I think a lot of the negativity right now isn’t necessarily warranted and should be save for if we don’t look any better next year. -
Down with the God King Steve Sarkisian
LTWOTIMES replied to whereiend's topic in On Texas Football Forum
This is getting real sad. Sark has flipped this program on it's head but that's still not good enough. Decade of nothing but what we have now, is still not enough. -
OTF Premium Recruiting - could be some interesting news
GoHorns1 replied to Bobby Burton's topic in On Texas Football Forum
Bobby any additional news and timeline -
11/17/2025 - An important date to remember
Bonaparte replied to Jaybird's topic in On Texas Football Forum
This will be what happens. -
Down with the God King Steve Sarkisian
whereiend replied to whereiend's topic in On Texas Football Forum
😂 I want it to be so believe me. But the track record shows that this guy can't do all three of these jobs at the level we need. -
Down with the God King Steve Sarkisian
akrupa23 replied to whereiend's topic in On Texas Football Forum
-
Down with the God King Steve Sarkisian
whereiend replied to whereiend's topic in On Texas Football Forum
Dan Mullen is a good idea honestly. I didn't even think of that. I would totally do Dan Mullen combined with someone running a professional style personnel department. HC being in charge of both is a bad model. -
Quick destination decisions are what a transfer is. It's expedited recruiting in a short window. January and May both have issues. May at least gives schools and coaches in the playoffs the ability to manage rosters properly. Not worried about the athlete having the time to learn scheme compared to the issues coaches and schools are having. They get paid to figure it out.
-
The problem with that is if it opens in may , your gonna have guys that have to make quick destination decisions and on top of that, does it really benefit a player to come in and have to learn a scheme within 2-3 months?