All Activity

Do we know what is keeping Wisner out? I know they said lower leg, but that's pretty general.

Tre would of had 130 easy that game.

After all the talk we heard about Clark being explosive and looking good, his actual play was just bad. He had holes and creases, but he danced around and got tackled. Hopefully it was a literal jitters thing and he'll actually run up field.

I just finished the State of the Program video and immediately went to watch the run game. The run game flaws were do to running back vision just as much if not more than blocking. We missed Wisner that game. On the second drive of the game, I forget which back was in, but on 1st and 10 we gain 2 yards where if the back cuts outside between the TE/T it's blocked for 5-7 yards. The next play the line gets push but the back is dancing in the whole instead on putting his foot in the ground. He gained 5, where Tre would have gotten 15. There's many like that throughout the game. The line whiffed here and in on run blocks, but it was better than most give credit for.

This graph explains who Arch is as a passer right now. The intermediate passing in the middle of the feild was an area of concern going into the season. Arch works best according to the chart and eye test outside the numbers and when in the RZ on waggles, flood concepts, and boots. Good thing is if teams want to play middle of the feild closed defenses they're playing to his strengths.

Your avatar. lol

Oklahoma, A&M, Auburn, Mississippi State and Missouri are the repeat opponents from last season.

This should be the expectation, this isn’t a hard ask.

Damn straight! What’re we paying these guys for if not perfection!!

How? That is stuff we SHOULD be doing vs a team like UTEP.

If that happens, you are going to have egg on your face.

Texas ran the ball well against OSU.

I like Ruhle but I don’t know I would have played that shot so early in the season against an obviously inferior opponent where you have the game in hand.

To add -- I heard we are benching Arch who is not Texas's "lisan al gaib" and playing Lacey instead because Arch is actually bad! 😯

Didn’t you hear we forfeit this season and are on to next haven’t you seen the board the last few weeks 🤣

I doubt Mosely is a starter when he comes back. He'll probably rotate at x and z.

Sark has his recievers learn all positions. So it's not necessarily who comes out, but more how does the rotation go. It all depends on what Sark wants out of certain plays. You can get an infinite amount of combinations of Mosely, Livingstone, Wingo, and Moore who are the lead recievers right now.

Another good test for the young team.

Who is coming out for Mosely when he is healthy, and is it a positive trade off? If we go 10, Endries? who is a solid threat or If we go 11 or 12, Livingstone? (who is our "best" wr right now possibly) Just a thought.

Thank for sharing. This chart summarizes all the discussion points in the posts above very succinctly. And there are some profound implications: * today, there are 65 teams across the P4 conferences (inc ND). If only 18 teams generate half the media revenue of the entire D1 (140 schools), that implies that 47 schools in P4 conferences are being somewhat subsidized by the big 18 revenue schools. If you prefer softer language, 47 schools currently in P4 are receiving outsized media revenue relative to their own individual media revenue value. * it also implies that more than half of the current P2 schools (SEC and Big Ten collectively are 34 schools today) are below average contributors to their own conferences media revenue. Note; there are 15 current P2 schools on the list of 18 schools above. In other words, even within the P2 conferences, 15 schools pull more than half the revenue weight of the other 18 schools. This is what I mean when I state the next great battle in college sports may be WITHIN the P2 conferences. Think Vandy, Rutgers, Minnesota, or Northwestern being a part of the final 40-48 schools of major college football. Hmm… * Once the largest ACC schools (Clemson, FSU, UNC) are added to the mix, it’s doubtful that any other ACC or Big 12 schools will be above mean (average) contributors to the media revenue generation of the major college football league. NONE! This is why the biggest 18-20 schools will be very reluctant to expand the P2 conferences beyond the 40-48 schools mentioned above. * To bring things full circle, you now should understand why Cody Campbell is worried about the future of Texas Tech. Keep in mind, Campbell is now the Chairman of the Board of Trustees at Tech, not just some football booster. His school’s future is predicated on being part of the finalized major college football league in 2031, and he realizes he’ll be part of the “subsidized” group of schools, NOT the group of outsized revenue generators. And that’s going to be a tough sell for a Lubbock, TX school.