All Activity

I didn't get to see him play but a great #82 for Texas was Corby Robertson. All-SWC defensive end in 1966 1967 All-American team at linebacker Team co-captain in 1968 when UT was SWC co-champion

Any updates or insight on Matthew Caldwell's fit here at Texas?

Ain't nothing compared to Mia Scott. Made every possible play. Reminds me of Kobe 2001.

I got work to do this morning, Joe. I don't have time for your gif games. 😁

Look at Trevor Goosby there bigger than everyone.

Your numbers are off. We actually have the following: 4 5 stars 1 4 star 6 3 stars We're also in on this 5 star punter: Michael Bukauskas

8:15 AM..... ish.

Great Longhorn stuff.

Agree. I also liked the wildcat with Fozzy. 🙂

Thanks!

Co-signed!

Recruiting Geoff Swaim, who has 10 seasons in the NFL under his belt, might be the best contribution Bryan Harsin made to the program during his time on the Texas staff.

I'm thinking 1987 might have been the greatest year in the history of Western civilization.

Lock that woman down, CJ. Good as it gets.

We’re 82 days away from kickoff in Columbus, when the Horns open the season against Ohio State. Who is your favorite No. 82 overall the years? BJ Johnson Geoff Swaim

Hopefully Justice Fitzpatrick, since he’s still taking visits while committed.

I hope Baxter and Mia Scott produce some Texas legacy players.

Wow, they’re really rolling out the shag carpet. I guess this is just what recruiting looks like in the we-still-have-to-pay-for-Jimbo era.

I believe I have kinda touched on this before, but I want to thank all of you (Bobby, Gerry, Rod, CJ, Blake and Jeff Howe) hope didn’t miss anyone, for the weekend update shows. It’s awesome, especially during the height of the recruiting season to be able to celebrate these commitments by watching live updates. We can always get that information here, however getting to have a discussion on a live about it shortly after it happens is awesome. Thanks again and Hook’em. 🤘

Who is Clark working on??

It should be noted that players in sports that don't generate positive revenue won't have a legal leg to stand on in court. The whole premise of this is that schools are making a ton of money and refusing to compensate those who generate the money. If the sport doesn't generate positive revenue, there's no money to share. That's the cost of removing the veil of amateurism.

You know the clearing house stuff won't hold up in court, but there is a good chance the revenue share component won't hold up either. The way this is being set up by the schools is to have players sign "publicity rights" waivers in exchange for some money. If a player can prove that such a waiver is financially limiting, the rights waiver will be struck down also. The rights are inalienable. Again, it will be individual players that sue, not the schools. Then why did the judge agree? The judge agreed because she doesn't care how stupid the schools are. It's not her job to make sure they can't be held accountable in the future. Without an employment agreement there is no legally tight way to establish the limit. I've read a couple of legal assessments that argue the NCAA is intentionally setting this up so they can stoke public discontent and get Congress to grant an anti-trust exemption. You can't have an anti-trust exemption without an employment agreement, so that's a wash at best. They could've already taken the employment road and truly "settled" the issue, but they're stubbornly resisting that outcome.

When your perspective comes from the prison shower, you tend to view the world from the downside.