Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I would not be surprised to see 1 or 2 of our WR go in the portal. Sark continues to have a small rotation and as it is currently next years rotation is already likely set. Wingo, Mosely, Livingstone, McCutcheon.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, HookemChappy said:

I would not be surprised to see 1 or 2 of our WR go in the portal. Sark continues to have a small rotation and as it is currently next years rotation is already likely set. Wingo, Mosely, Livingstone, McCutcheon.

Got a feeling Ffrench is gone

Posted
3 minutes ago, hookthemall said:

Why does everyone think this?

Subtle things CJ has said plus just him seeing essentially no playing time while us returning pretty much every WR and looking for portal WRs on top of it. He'll probably want starter type play time next year and likely isn't getting it here.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

While I agree that I think that Texas absolutely needs to add a WR (certainly that of the speed variety), I do think that the drops/missed throws kind of clouded that Wingo had a better season than people think. Texas just desperately needs players that can do more after the catch. IMO Wingo is the only guy right now that makes plays in space. 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
14 hours ago, Bonaparte said:

McCutcheon, Lockett and Ffrench.

No one is on the team next year until they are. Those guys didn’t come here for free and they won’t stay for free. We need to maximize our resources to built the best roster and culture we can for next year and hopefully it’ll be done in a way that is sustainable moving forward. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
54 minutes ago, HookemChappy said:

I would not be surprised to see 1 or 2 of our WR go in the portal. Sark continues to have a small rotation and as it is currently next years rotation is already likely set. Wingo, Mosely, Livingstone, McCutcheon.

That would be a very disappointing rotation for next year. Mosley should be our chain moving #3 guy. If Wingo wants to prove it here at a reduced number and no guaranteed role, cool. Livingstone is a solid depth guy. We’ll see on McCutcheon. Gotta bring in some dawgs at WR, and preferably one of them has some twitch. 

Posted

y’all need to take a second to double check who is tweeting this out before posting, there are people on this board that still think Ryan Williams and Caden Durham are in the portal lmao

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, texcoyote15 said:

There we go. Sark needs to get off the shows and get busy 

I think you need to look at the site one more time. 

Posted
54 minutes ago, Atticus said:

That would be a very disappointing rotation for next year. Mosley should be our chain moving #3 guy. If Wingo wants to prove it here at a reduced number and no guaranteed role, cool. Livingstone is a solid depth guy. We’ll see on McCutcheon. Gotta bring in some dawgs at WR, and preferably one of them has some twitch. 

Wingo needs to improve his hands but he is explosive once he catches the ball. Livingstone is a great #3 and will only improve. Mosley is a strong #2 and may see some time in the slot next year. Outside the portal for a proven #1, then we will have to see if Bishop can break the line up, or if Ffrench or Lockett can break the line up.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, HookemChappy said:

Wingo needs to improve his hands but he is explosive once he catches the ball. Livingstone is a great #3 and will only improve. Mosley is a strong #2 and may see some time in the slot next year. Outside the portal for a proven #1, then we will have to see if Bishop can break the line up, or if Ffrench or Lockett can break the line up.

💯

Wingo needs to make more of the easy catches but let's not act like the dude doesn't make plays. Much like Arch, he needs to make more of the easy plays to go with his tough ones. 

  • Hook 'Em 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.