Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Moderators
Posted

Georgia cancels two scheduled series for the future.

The first is Georgia and Louisville set for 2026 and 2027. Then the Georgia and NC State series which was much further down the road was cancelled as well.

This of course comes on the heels of Alabama cancelling its series with USF in 2026.

Still, Texas remains scheduled to play Ohio State in 2026, Michigan in 2027, and Notre Dame in 2028-29.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
1 minute ago, FaxMachine said:

We MUST cancel Notre Dame. 

Agree - Ohio St. and Michigan make sense to keep because that's the return trip to Austin so Texas wants to reap the cost benefits, however Notre Dame not the same situation.  Right now, only Notre Dame gets credit whether they win or not, Texas would be punished for losing but not really gain anything winning the game.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted

What if you have a weak SEC schedule one year, lose to the top SEC teams you play, and go 10-2 with no good OOC win?  That’s essentially what happened to Vanderbilt.  They had no argument against a team like Oklahoma who happened to have a strong SEC schedule.  If Vanderbilt had played and beaten Notre Dame they would be evaluated a lot different relative to OU.

Posted
34 minutes ago, HookemTexas said:

Ohio St. and Michigan make sense to keep because that's the return trip to Austin so Texas wants to reap the cost benefits


What is the cost benefit if a loss keeps us out of the playoffs?

With a 9 game SEC schedule next year 2 conference losses will be common. 

Posted
26 minutes ago, ClubWhatever said:

What if you have a weak SEC schedule one year, lose to the top SEC teams you play, and go 10-2 with no good OOC win?  That’s essentially what happened to Vanderbilt.  They had no argument against a team like Oklahoma who happened to have a strong SEC schedule.  If Vanderbilt had played and beaten Notre Dame they would be evaluated a lot different relative to OU.

Vanderbilt was the victim of Vanderbilt imho. They scheduled VT when they were bad and VT was good not their fault. No one really wanted Vandy in because they’re literally the only SEC team with a fan base that doesn’t care or travel like the rest. 

Posted
29 minutes ago, ClubWhatever said:

What if you have a weak SEC schedule one year, lose to the top SEC teams you play, and go 10-2 with no good OOC win?  That’s essentially what happened to Vanderbilt.  They had no argument against a team like Oklahoma who happened to have a strong SEC schedule.  If Vanderbilt had played and beaten Notre Dame they would be evaluated a lot different relative to OU.

SEC branding as the top tier conference has a lot of sway (i.e. Aggie). We wouldn't be penalized much. More risk losing a hig non-con.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.