Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted April 11 Moderators Share Posted April 11 At 76 years old. https://amp.tmz.com/2024/04/11/oj-simpson-dead-dies-cancer/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
closetojumping Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 Good. He was a hypocritical, wife-beating murderer of innocents. He deserved worse than what he got on this planet. 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GetHooked Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 RIH OJ. You will NOT be missed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HenryJames Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 If I Did It by Cancer 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunk randoke Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 He got away with murder on earth. He’s in another justice system now. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrancoBevo3.0 Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 He got away with murder. I can pray for peace for anyone that is feeling hurt by his passing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Gilbert Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 OJ was one of the more polarizing figures in America over the last 50 years or so. While I personally believe he killed his wife there are millions who believe he was framed. However, there was no doubting his on the field talent. If you can separate the football talent and his personal life (I realize that is a difficult task) there is no denying he was of the top 5 RBs in football history. At one time he was on every TV in America whether it was commercials, movies, or TV shows. Women loved him and men wanted to be like him. Of course that is similar to saying that, “Hitler loved his mom”. Whatever demons he dealt with in life will probably follow him into the Afterlife. There are very few people whose death I would celebrate (Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Saddam, Castro, etc) OJ is not one of them. I hope his death will allow millions to put his life and deeds, good and bad, behind them. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby Burton Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 Met him in person once when I was a kid (this is 40+ years ago). Two random thoughts: - He had maybe the largest head for a human I had ever seen in person up to that point in my life. - He wasn't rude, but he wasn't exactly nice either. It felt different than a lot of the other athletes I had met at that time. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sirhornsalot Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 2 hours ago, Robert Gilbert said: OJ was one of the more polarizing figures in America over the last 50 years or so. While I personally believe he killed his wife there are millions who believe he was framed. However, there was no doubting his on the field talent. If you can separate the football talent and his personal life (I realize that is a difficult task) there is no denying he was of the top 5 RBs in football history. At one time he was on every TV in America whether it was commercials, movies, or TV shows. Women loved him and men wanted to be like him. Of course that is similar to saying that, “Hitler loved his mom”. Whatever demons he dealt with in life will probably follow him into the Afterlife. There are very few people whose death I would celebrate (Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Saddam, Castro, etc) OJ is not one of them. I hope his death will allow millions to put his life and deeds, good and bad, behind them. That's a tough one to ask of people when they know he got away with murder. It was wrong. It was injustice. And you don't let go of that because you now know it can and probably will happen again. The sheer brutality of the murders were such that it pointed to the person who would have reason to be THAT mad. And before anything got started, OJ basically admitted guilt with his runaway bronco. If you're innocent, you don't run. Good riddance. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkInAustin Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 Another lawyer and I watched the trial and second guessed it all the way through. We did this long distance. He was in San Jose and I was in Austin. Our first joint realization was how different criminal trial procedure was then in CA from Texas. California did not enforce a cumulative evidence rule in state criminal proceedings. This meant that the defense in CA could carry on virtually forever, with multiple experts, where in Texas each party would have been most likely limited to one expert for each technical proffer. The prosecution started well and made a solid case. But then the case spun out of control from a Texas perspective, and even my San Jose buddy thought that the trial judge was allowing a circus by California's easier standards. After closing arguments, we thought a hung jury would result, the prosecution's clear prima facie case then having become merely a distant memory. Compared to that prosecution that somewhat lost control of its own messaging we later saw a different result in the civil case, in which the very experienced lawyers for the victim's family rode herd on the trial and won easily, and with no doubts whatsoever. This is just a random historical comment from an old retired lawyer who thought the trial came to a predictable outcome because of how it was tried and not because OJ wasn't actually guilty, and not even because the jury was "unfair." I don't know what CA criminal trial procedure is like today, but at that time what would have taken five days of testimony in Austin would have required five weeks in L.A. -- really. 3 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan91 Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 God be with you as you meet your maker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestlakeLonghorn Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 If the glove don't fit... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
horns96 Posted April 12 Share Posted April 12 I didn't realize his breakout game as a freshman was against Texas? That career began in 1967, Simpson's first year at USC. In Week 2, he announced himself to the larger college world by running all over the Texas Longhorns. Things didn't start off well for Simpson... At the 10-yard line in the first quarter, he fumbled, leading to an 85-yard Longhorns drive and a touchdown. That'd be the only time Texas would lead for the game. Two possessions later, the Trojans tied the game after Simpson punched it in from the 2-yard line. They continued to feed their running back, controlling the clock and scoring another touchdown courtesy of a pass from quarterback Steve Sogge to receiver Bob Miller. Texas ended up falling 17-14 and Simpson finished with 158 yards and a touchdown on 30 carries. While not his best performance of the season, he had carried USC's offense against one of the best teams in the nation. Yeah, I know nobody reads or has access to the Statesman.... 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmk4pres Posted April 12 Share Posted April 12 He can rest easy knowing his ex wife's killer is dead. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bierce Posted April 12 Share Posted April 12 6 hours ago, MarkInAustin said: Another lawyer and I watched the trial and second guessed it all the way through. We did this long distance. He was in San Jose and I was in Austin. Our first joint realization was how different criminal trial procedure was then in CA from Texas. California did not enforce a cumulative evidence rule in state criminal proceedings. This meant that the defense in CA could carry on virtually forever, with multiple experts, where in Texas each party would have been most likely limited to one expert for each technical proffer. The prosecution started well and made a solid case. But then the case spun out of control from a Texas perspective, and even my San Jose buddy thought that the trial judge was allowing a circus by California's easier standards. After closing arguments, we thought a hung jury would result, the prosecution's clear prima facie case then having become merely a distant memory. Compared to that prosecution that somewhat lost control of its own messaging we later saw a different result in the civil case, in which the very experienced lawyers for the victim's family rode herd on the trial and won easily, and with no doubts whatsoever. This is just a random historical comment from an old retired lawyer who thought the trial came to a predictable outcome because of how it was tried and not because OJ wasn't actually guilty, and not even because the jury was "unfair." I don't know what CA criminal trial procedure is like today, but at that time what would have taken five days of testimony in Austin would have required five weeks in L.A. -- really. Not quite yet retired lawyer here with a different opinion. The prosecution did not want to get a conviction. It wanted to lose the criminal trial with an eye to making sure L.A. wasn't burned to the ground by rioters, so it embarked on a ridiculously long trial to punish Simpson by destroying his reputation and financial standing. I thought it was a brilliant strategy, and the prosecution got everything it wanted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonbailey Posted April 12 Share Posted April 12 Fun fact: OJ was slated to be the Terminator before James Cameron pulled the plug on that and cast Schwarzenegger. Apparently he didn't think a nice guy like OJ would be believable as a killing machine. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Gilbert Posted April 12 Share Posted April 12 OJ’s legacy is a complicated one with two sides. On one hand OJ was one of the first crossover African American celebrities. He exploded upon the college football stage in the late 60s by winning the Heisman and USC winning the national championship. As the #1 pick of the Bills he was soon the best running back in the NFL and set the then record of 2,003 rushing yards in a season. Off the field he was a media darling whose good looks, charm, and personality resonated with both the black and white communities. After his football career ended his popularity and visibility increased. Movies, TV shows, and commercial opportunities flooded in for him. He was everywhere, loved by millions, and respected by all Americans. On the other hand, his legacy is one of murder and betrayal. Of course many of our celebrities have committed murder, rape, or been jailed for drug charges. For example, Ali was stripped of his title and went to jail for failure to enter military service. OJ’s arrest ans subsequent acquittal divided Americans along racial lines. Most African Americans believed him to be innocent and whites viewed him as quilty. OJ’s betrayal was not to the two people I believe he murdered. That act alone should condemn him in America’s eyes. No, his betrayal was to the American people. Ali lost his title and went to jail but he came back and rewon the title and the hearts and respect of America. OJ was the first ‘modern’ hero/celeb whose actions, off the field, destroyed his legacy from the field. JMO. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texas84 Posted April 12 Share Posted April 12 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BornOrange Posted April 12 Share Posted April 12 15 hours ago, horns96 said: I didn't realize his breakout game as a freshman was against Texas? That career began in 1967, Simpson's first year at USC. ................................ He was a junior his first year at USC because he went to San Francisco CC 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
horns96 Posted April 12 Share Posted April 12 44 minutes ago, BornOrange said: He was a junior his first year at USC because he went to San Francisco CC Somehow didn’t know that! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sirhornsalot Posted April 12 Share Posted April 12 Guy had one of the biggest melons I've ever seen 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BornOrange Posted April 12 Share Posted April 12 (edited) 3 hours ago, horns96 said: Somehow didn’t know that! He was the first Heisman winner that went to a Juco. Mike Rozier and Cam Newton also went the Juco route. Edited April 12 by BornOrange 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HooksHorn Posted April 12 Share Posted April 12 I remember how big a deal this was when i was a kid.Before the murders I only knew of OJ from commercials and a Leslie Nelson movie. Burn in He'll OJ. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby Burton Posted April 12 Share Posted April 12 On 4/11/2024 at 2:31 PM, MarkInAustin said: Another lawyer and I watched the trial and second guessed it all the way through. We did this long distance. He was in San Jose and I was in Austin. Our first joint realization was how different criminal trial procedure was then in CA from Texas. California did not enforce a cumulative evidence rule in state criminal proceedings. This meant that the defense in CA could carry on virtually forever, with multiple experts, where in Texas each party would have been most likely limited to one expert for each technical proffer. The prosecution started well and made a solid case. But then the case spun out of control from a Texas perspective, and even my San Jose buddy thought that the trial judge was allowing a circus by California's easier standards. After closing arguments, we thought a hung jury would result, the prosecution's clear prima facie case then having become merely a distant memory. Compared to that prosecution that somewhat lost control of its own messaging we later saw a different result in the civil case, in which the very experienced lawyers for the victim's family rode herd on the trial and won easily, and with no doubts whatsoever. This is just a random historical comment from an old retired lawyer who thought the trial came to a predictable outcome because of how it was tried and not because OJ wasn't actually guilty, and not even because the jury was "unfair." I don't know what CA criminal trial procedure is like today, but at that time what would have taken five days of testimony in Austin would have required five weeks in L.A. -- really. Appreciate this post. Thanks for sharing your perspective! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarcelS Posted April 17 Share Posted April 17 Yall are sad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.