HonkEm Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago Just read this thread, and it feels like we've reached the point where every offensive problem in the program has somehow been assigned to either Arch, Sark, the Mannings, Kyle Flood, or a secret conspiracy involving all four. The simplest answer is usually the right one. Arch has missed reads. The film shows it. The OL has had protection breakdowns. The film shows that too. Receivers have been open at times. The film shows that. The play calling hasn't always helped. We've all seen that. What I don't see is any evidence that Grandpa Archie is sitting in a dark room somewhere faxing play sheets to Sark and telling him, "Make sure my grandson never runs." What's funny is that half the board says Arch is secretly a dual-threat superstar being forced to play like Peyton Manning, while the other half says he can't process an RPO and was overrated from the start. Those two things can't both be true. Personally, I think the answer is a lot less dramatic. Arch is a talented QB who's playing like a talented QB that's struggling with pressure, speed of processing, and confidence right now. That happens. Quinn went through rough stretches. Most young quarterbacks do. The part that gets lost in all this is that if Arch was truly as bad as some are claiming, he wouldn't have had people begging for him to play for two years. And if he was as perfect as others claim, we wouldn't be watching film clips of missed blitzes and open receivers. Maybe the truth is that he's neither a bust nor a savior. Maybe he's just a young quarterback trying to figure it out while 100,000 offensive coordinators on the internet diagnose every snap. And for the record, if the Mannings really are controlling Texas' offense, they're doing a terrible job of getting their guy drafted. NFL teams tend to like quarterbacks who can identify blitzes and hit open receivers too. 😂 Quote
HornsUpThumbsDown Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 8 hours ago, Go Horns JC said: Per Chris Carter sportscast: Arch chose UT Sark because Sark committed to convert Arch to a pocket passer. Arch's natural system is RPO / Running Qb. Papa Archie is focused in protecting Arch from injuries. Sark and UT are in a pickle. Per Chris Carter, Arch's is underdeveloped as a pure pocket passer. It could be due to the OL or RB. What do you think? He sucks at RPO too Quote
UTexas Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 20 hours ago, Go Horns JC said: Per Chris Carter sportscast: Arch chose UT Sark because Sark committed to convert Arch to a pocket passer. Arch's natural system is RPO / Running Qb. Papa Archie is focused in protecting Arch from injuries. Sark and UT are in a pickle. Per Chris Carter, Arch's is underdeveloped as a pure pocket passer. It could be due to the OL or RB. What do you think? I think Chris Carter doesn't know sh*t. Quote
Deep in the heart Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 18 hours ago, MBHORNSFAN said: 2023 Yards per game 475 ranked 9 2024 yards per game 437 ranked 21st 2025 . Yard 388 70th 2026 361 93rd 23 and 24 were also playoff years Amd this This was probably one of the best video breakdowns of Arch that I've seen. Arch is thinking too much and it's affecting every other area of his game. I think his family wanted him to play for Sark because of the pro-style offense but it's just not working out for him. And we don't have the personnel up front to run it because we can't run the ball. The onus is on Sark to fit the offense to his personnel and he isn't doing it. Which I don't get because he says he sits down with Arch to find out what he likes and where his strengths are. There's a disconnect. Just because you have 5 stars doesn't mean you can be plug and play. 1 Quote
pinkman_90 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago (edited) 16 hours ago, HornsUpThumbsDown said: He sucks at RPO too That’s interesting analysis considering the Texas offense rarely runs any true RPOs. Edited 5 hours ago by pinkman_90 Quote
HornsUpThumbsDown Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 4 hours ago, pinkman_90 said: That’s interesting analysis considering the Texas offense rarely runs any true RPOs. Exactly my point Quote
Grant Ward Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago This is Tom Herman part 2. Sark will be forced to take offensive changes dictated by the money and will not be allowed to meddle, or he will hit the road. Quote
Rockin TL Posted 54 minutes ago Posted 54 minutes ago (edited) 5 minutes ago, Grant Ward said: This is Tom Herman part 2. Sark will be forced to take offensive changes dictated by the money and will not be allowed to meddle, or he will hit the road. That conversation already happened, he chose to fire the DC and double down on himself and his buddies Edited 54 minutes ago by Rockin TL Quote
Grant Ward Posted 50 minutes ago Posted 50 minutes ago 2 minutes ago, Rockin TL said: That conversation already happened, he chose to fire the DC and double down on himself and his buddies The defense has never been the problem. It's always been the offense..... The offense has been bad for a long time. Quote
Rockin TL Posted 49 minutes ago Posted 49 minutes ago Just now, Grant Ward said: The defense has never been the problem. It's always been the offense..... The offense has been bad for a long time. I don’t believe you understood what I typed. Quote
Grant Ward Posted 20 minutes ago Posted 20 minutes ago 28 minutes ago, Rockin TL said: I don’t believe you understood what I typed. I understood. Sarch is toast. Quote
Grant Ward Posted 3 minutes ago Posted 3 minutes ago Why does the national media always out scoop the Texas media? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.