Jump to content

How I Would Rank Them


Recommended Posts

I always get asked how I would rank the Texas recruits within the recruiting class. I've been doing this for 20+ years now.

I've gotten some right and some wrong. So don't take what I say or how I rank these players as the gospel. It's just another man's opinion based on what I've seen and what I've been told.

2024 Texas Recruits

1. WR, Ryan Wingo

2. Edge, Colin Simmons

3. S, Xavier Filsaime

4. OL, Brandon Baker

5. CB, Wardell Mack

6. OL, Daniel Cruz

7. RB, Christian Clark

8. TE, Jordan Washington

9. Edge, Zina Umeozulu

10. QB, Trey Owens

11. RB, Jerrick Gibson

12. OL, Nate Kibble

13. DL, Alex January

14. LB, Tyanthony Smith

15. CB, Kobe Black

16. WR, Parker Livingstone

17. S, Jordon Johnson-Rubell

18. DL, Melvin Hills

19. WR/ATH, Aaron Butler

20. CB, Santana Wilson

21. P, Michael Kerns

22. WR, Freddie Dubose Jr. (inj.)

Note: I'm interested to see if Dubose heals further from his injury. I would rate him differently if I knew that for sure.

 


View full news

  • Hook 'Em 14
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Bobby Burton said:

I always get asked how I would rank the Texas recruits within the recruiting class. I've been doing this for 20+ years now.

I've gotten some right and some wrong. So don't take what I say or how I rank these players as the gospel. It's just another man's opinion based on what I've seen and what I've been told.

2024 Texas Recruits

1. WR, Ryan Wingo

2. Edge, Colin Simmons

3. S, Xavier Filsaime

4. OL, Brandon Baker

5. CB, Wardell Mack

6. OL, Daniel Cruz

7. RB, Christian Clark

8. TE, Jordan Washington

9. Edge, Zina Umeozulu

10. QB, Trey Owens

11. RB, Jerrick Gibson

12. OL, Nate Kibble

13. DL, Alex January

14. LB, Tyanthony Smith

15. CB, Kobe Black

16. WR, Parker Livingstone

17. S, Jordon Johnson-Rubell

18. DL, Melvin Hills

19. WR/ATH, Aaron Butler

20. CB, Santana Wilson

21. P, Michael Kerns

22. WR, Freddie Dubose Jr. (inj.)

Note: I'm interested to see if Dubose heals further from his injury. I would rate him differently if I knew that for sure.

 

 

View full news

 

When someone like Dubose is "ranked" so low it looks like he's a scrub and I doubt that he's a scrub...maybe RATE 1-100 instead and that will give you a better idea of what sort of class you REALLY have

 

JMO

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TeeDoe said:

Interesting you have Clark over Gibson.  I’d love to hear your thoughts on why.

He's smaller than Gibson but I just think he shows some feet in the hole that make him look a little special at times. I also love that he's a guy who had a crapload of tackles as a linebacker. I just think Clark is a straight baller, despite his size.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, 4thandFive said:

Bobby- what’s your gut tell you about how fast Wingo will see noticeable field time?

Depends on what kind of spring he has. If he's healthy, takes ball seriously, I think he'll play early and often. I don't think he'll start, but I think he'll get himself in the mix.

He has something that Sark is going to want on the field and that no one else really gives him - speed combined with legit outside size.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, taxsaver said:

When someone like Dubose is "ranked" so low it looks like he's a scrub and I doubt that he's a scrub...maybe RATE 1-100 instead and that will give you a better idea of what sort of class you REALLY have

 

JMO

That's fair. Dubose is no scrub. The issue here is injury. Before his injury, I'm not sure if he isn't in top 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bobby Burton said:

Depends on what kind of spring he has. If he's healthy, takes ball seriously, I think he'll play early and often. I don't think he'll start, but I think he'll get himself in the mix.

He has something that Sark is going to want on the field and that no one else really gives him - speed combined with legit outside size.

Not to bring up bad moments from 2023, but I wonder how much a taller WR would facilitate a different approach in RedZone scheme and available options. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, taxsaver said:

When someone like Dubose is "ranked" so low it looks like he's a scrub and I doubt that he's a scrub...maybe RATE 1-100 instead and that will give you a better idea of what sort of class you REALLY have

 

JMO

As I understand it (based upon what Bobby, CJ, and others have stated) the problem with DeBose has not fully healed from his Jr year injury. I think we all believe that if DeBose is fully healthy he would be a plus contributor by at least his 2nd year on campus. 

Edited by Robert Gilbert
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sirhornsalot said:

I would have Butler and Black much higher. Butler is going to be a star. Black was just too low for a kid who was once a 5-star.

 

 

Keep in mind, this is just one man’s opinion. Granted Bobby has more experience in this type of evaluation than all of us combined but he is not infallible, as he has said. However, I would tend to go with his opinion over my own observations. When it comes right down to it, this is a beauty contest. Do you like blondes or brunettes? Do you prefer size in a WR or speed? Beatles or the Rolling Stones? 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Robert Gilbert said:

Keep in mind, this is just one man’s opinion. Granted Bobby has more experience in this type of evaluation than all of us combined but he is not infallible, as he has said. However, I would tend to go with his opinion over my own observations. When it comes right down to it, this is a beauty contest. Do you like blondes or brunettes? Do you prefer size in a WR or speed? Beatles or the Rolling Stones? 

Whataburger or In N Out?  

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, 4thandFive said:

Not to bring up bad moments from 2023, but I wonder how much a taller WR would facilitate a different approach in RedZone scheme and available options. 

I think its just as much on Sark trusting his QB not to turn it over so that we don't limit the targets to RPO inside and fade or whip to the pylon.

That said... With the experience on the OL (and I hope increased nastiness at G with either Hutson or Neto hopefully taking over for Hayden at least on the GL) the run game should be able to finish drives inside the 3 with TDs and if that happens more regularly, the bootleg, or play fake to a stalk and go Helm/Niblack becomes deadly. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Rob_HookEm said:

I think its just as much on Sark trusting his QB not to turn it over so that we don't limit the targets to RPO inside and fade or whip to the pylon.

That said... With the experience on the OL (and I hope increased nastiness at G with either Hutson or Neto hopefully taking over for Hayden at least on the GL) the run game should be able to finish drives inside the 3 with TDs and if that happens more regularly, the bootleg, or play fake to a stalk and go Helm/Niblack becomes deadly. 

I am hoping to see some increased force and consistency on the OL. Especially on the left side. Banks & Neto should be good. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.