Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Committee should  pick #1 seed based on recency all things being equal. Texas is clearly playing better than SC right in the last 5-6 games.  It's a big deal not getting the #1 seed and picking the site of the first games. 

Edited by ChanmanV
  • Moderators
Posted
29 minutes ago, ChanmanV said:

Committee should  pick #1 seed based on recency all things being equal. Texas is clearly playing better than SC right in the last 5-6 games.  It's a big deal not getting the #1 seed and picking the site of the first games. 

Think the flip is for the SEC Tournament seeding 

 

 

  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.