Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Thanks for posting Blake!

Any insights on whether Title IX will be invoked by those questioning why > 90% of the settlement money will go to men?  Especially if women's basketball becomes a source of revenue with bigger TV contracts?  I get it, football and men's basketball generate most all the athletic department revenue, but Title IX law may not look at it that way.

Are existing NIL deals grandfathered in (say USC for example) or will they be subject to review by the NIL Go team?

Any fears that schools without football teams but strong basketball teams might dominate since they can spend much more on BB than those funneling 75% to football?

I'm looking forward to seeing how they enforce the outside NIL deals too.  It seems anyone with a large social media presence can generate a lot of $$ from sponsoring companies in their posts - Livvy Dunne for example, or Texas track and field guy Sam Hurley, who was earning around a million/year on social media even though few Texas sports fans ever heard of him.

  • Hook 'Em 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.