Moderators Blake Munroe Posted 3 hours ago Moderators Posted 3 hours ago From USA Today… it’s too long to copy and paste but the article is here: https://ftw.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/2025/06/07/house-settlement-changes-immediately-notice/84089252007/ 3 3 Quote
Q Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Blake Munroe said: From USA Today… it’s too long to copy and paste but the article is here: https://ftw.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/2025/06/07/house-settlement-changes-immediately-notice/84089252007/ Some good info in here. Appreciate it Blake 🤘🏿 Quote
ArizonaLonghorn Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Thanks for posting Blake! Any insights on whether Title IX will be invoked by those questioning why > 90% of the settlement money will go to men? Especially if women's basketball becomes a source of revenue with bigger TV contracts? I get it, football and men's basketball generate most all the athletic department revenue, but Title IX law may not look at it that way. Are existing NIL deals grandfathered in (say USC for example) or will they be subject to review by the NIL Go team? Any fears that schools without football teams but strong basketball teams might dominate since they can spend much more on BB than those funneling 75% to football? I'm looking forward to seeing how they enforce the outside NIL deals too. It seems anyone with a large social media presence can generate a lot of $$ from sponsoring companies in their posts - Livvy Dunne for example, or Texas track and field guy Sam Hurley, who was earning around a million/year on social media even though few Texas sports fans ever heard of him. 1 Quote
Austalgia Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Just as long as we don’t have the softball umpires reviewing the NIL deals we should be ok. 3 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.