Skip to content

Burning Question Revisited: Did Sark and Arch get on the same page?

It’s time to revisit On Texas Football's “One Burning Question,” where we ask a question about the Texas Longhorns heading into a game.

Entering Saturday’s 27-24 loss to Florida, the burning question was:

Can Steve Sarkisian and Arch Manning get on the same page?

They didn’t. It was bad enough that Sarkisian must at least entertain a quarterback change.

Sarkisian is ultimately to blame for the Texas (4-2, 1-2 SEC) offense woefully underperforming.

He assembled a roster he believed could execute his offense at a championship level. After Saturday’s loss to the Gators, the Longhorns rank among the worst offenses in the country in total offense (93rd), yards per play (tied for 104th), rushing offense (102nd), 10-yard plays from scrimmage (tied for 81st) and 20-yard plays from scrimmage (tied for 126th).

Nevertheless, things came to a head in Sarkisian’s 19th consecutive game with Manning as his starting quarterback. Another week of blown opportunities, missed assignments, poor decision-making and Manning’s catastrophic mistakes overshadowing his positive plays might force Sarkisian to make a move that seemed unfathomable a few weeks ago.

Sarkisian had hot routes to help Manning handle blitzes. He simplified his quarterback’s reads. There were run-pass options where Manning could've used his legs to jumpstart the offense.

Manning, however, didn’t execute enough of those things to keep the offense from another feast-or-famine outing. Whether Manning isn’t confident enough to pull the trigger, can’t process what’s unfolding in front of him or is locked onto a predetermined read at all times, Sarkisian can no longer field an offense in which the starting quarterback needs training wheels.

Manning’s inability to get rid of the football on time cost the offense time and again against Florida, most notably on Myles Graham’s strip-sack that ended Texas’ comeback bid. Manning appeared to have Emmett Mosley V open on an out route, but he held the ball too long and succumbed to pressure, for the fifth and final time (the Longhorns have allowed 17 sacks in three games and are tied for 117th in FBS by allowing 2.83 sacks per game), resulting in a game-clinching turnover.

On second-and-3 from the Gators’ 16-yard line in the second quarter, Manning appeared to miss a pull read on a run-pass option. Had he pulled the ball instead of handing it off to Hollywood Smothers for a 4-yard loss, Manning could’ve either run for the first down or flipped the ball to Nick Townsend, who was open after leaking into the flat and had a chance to score.

Instead of taking a two-touchdown lead, Texas settled for a field goal.

Manning doesn’t appear capable of getting the offense out of a bad play (multiple rushing attempts into an outnumbered box and waves of unblocked defenders coming free on blitzes) or changing protection with a pre-snap check at the line of scrimmage. He’s incapable of making those decisions or doesn’t have Sarkisian’s trust to do so, either of which would be a serious indictment of Manning’s development (or lack thereof).

There’s no question now that Manning has regressed. Attributes that were his strengths (pocket awareness chief among them) have become weaknesses that are holding the offense back.

Whether Manning’s confidence has eroded to the point that he can’t regain or rebuild it is a legitimate concern.

Is he broken?

Can he fix what’s ailing him?

If he does, will it happen before the house of cards collapses?

The Sarkisian-Manning era was on a championship trajectory after last month’s comeback win over Ohio State.

Five weeks later, Sarkisian might be closer to pulling the plug and starting anew than he is to riding it out, waiting for Manning to get back on track.

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

  • Moderators
8 minutes ago, MBHORNSFAN said:

 

I see CFB a lot like the NFL now. ( wrong or right that is a discussion later)  but with that said coaches are gonna get popped sooner under this new era now.  

Yep. Much shorter leashes. Roster builds/rebuilds shouldn't be as tedious as they were before NIL.

akhookem

Supporters

Another reason to let Sark go after this season:

It’s always said “if you fire him, who are you going to hire?”

Now there is an actual answer waiting at Kentucky. Will Stein has Kentucky playing physical football, running the ball against everyone (with an RB we made look washed last year). He’s the answer to that question right now.

If you wait until next season for another Sark failure, we may be back to not knowing the answer to “who”.

Alex Butler

Supporters
11 minutes ago, Jeff Howe said:

It's a big few weeks for Sark's future, for sure. I've wrapped my head around the fact that these are rational, real conversations.

Should we just promote Mark Stoops as interim HC and let Sark be the OC with Muschamp as DC? He’s got the experience in the SEC and was able to bring UK up from absolute trash. Kidding…but only just. 

Lonestar knifemaker

Supporters

If Sark isn’t allowing Arch to audible out of a bad situation he’s playing with one hand tied behind his back. If Arch isn’t recognizing incompatible protection and adjusting it’s a different issue. Either is incomprehensible at this level of football.

Nikolas24

Supporters

I haven’t been on the hate sark train but I’m getting there after the last 2 weeks. I also don’t understand his all gas no brakes. When have we ever put our foot on the gas and blown out an opponent. Last I can think of is 2024 Florida game. Now on to arch. I think he so far gone mentally right now that idk if he’s going to recover. He looks lost at qb but if sark makes a change what’s that say about his qb development skills especially with how Quinn ended up? It’s a tough situation coming up but that’s why he gets paid millions.

 

Glass Joe

Supporters
5 minutes ago, Lonestar knifemaker said:

If Sark isn’t allowing Arch to audible out of a bad situation he’s playing with one hand tied behind his back. If Arch isn’t recognizing incompatible protection and adjusting it’s a different issue. Either is incomprehensible at this level of football.

He’s not.  The entire offense is just Sark joysticking the plays he designs, he likes, he is certain demonstrate his schematic brilliance.

The players are just mindless robots used as props by the brilliant puppetmaster himself.

Wait until you see what Arch can become at Miami next season under the tutelage of a real OC like Shannon Dawson.

Sark is just John Mackovic 2.0, complete with the bogus, unworthy reputation for offensive brilliance and the arrogance that leads to the failure.

JR Smith

Supporters

Coaching. Coaching. Coaching. Coaching. Thank you Sark for rebuilding the program and bringing us back to winning seasons. The o line has been putrid under flood. New personnel same dang problem. Flood has got to go. Flood can develop Tackles but jesus christ that interior line sucks since we've been in the SEC and their fluidity is non existent. Banks has got to go or at least let him focus only on special teams or TEs, one or the other. Sark has got to get an OC PLAYCALLER and an O LINE coach and start anew. We go from looking like one of the best OLine units in the nation to dog sh*t once we start playing SEC teams. Late eyes, missed assignments, getting out physicalled at the point of attack, I mean that is embarrassing. A good OLine will alleviate the majority of our issues on offense. FLOOD HAS GOT TO GO. Get someone that can get this unit to gel work consistently against SEC TEAMS. I full heartedly believe that if Sark gets rid of his longtime friends and hires winners he can continue to be the HC and playcaller. When the Oline doesn't help and your QB is either horribly coached or suddenly inept you will continue to lose against the rest of the schedule. 

Jordan91

Supporters
1 hour ago, Jeff Howe said:

I didn't know where else to put this, so I'll mention it here: In my opinion, the offensive line's performance was the worst of the season.

Too many missed assignments, poor communication and too many instances of guys losing one-on-one battles decisively in high-leverage situations. It's more than just guys getting beat. Sometimes, when I'm watching the All-22 copy, I can't tell who missed an assignment because the whole group looks out of sorts.

Sark is becoming a punchline nationally. Manning isn’t the problem nationally, Sark is the problem. And that really hurts the brand. He looked at this offensive line and said that’s enough. He kept the same oline coach. He mouths off to the media about checking the track record of the special teams coach. He knows damn well it’s bad. Off all the recruits to miss on Manning is the worst one possible. It’s how did he screw up Arch? How did he screw up an offense giving all the money spent? He chose his ego over common sense. Texas has to run the table get to the CFP. If he doesn’t it’s only going to get worse. 

Noah Vaughn

Supporters
(edited)

Offensive line play has been brutal at times, but a good portion of that responsibility has to fall on the QB.

A majority of the pressures seem to come from unidentified blitzers rather than pass protectors getting flat out beat. 

It doesn’t seem like Arch is able to identify potential free hitters, slide his protection, or hit his built-in hot routes. Those are all issues that can’t be fixed in a weeks worth of practice, and we’re one loss away from CFP elimination.

While all of the offensive position groups have had their struggles individually, a change at QB seems like the only tide that could raise all ships.

 

Edited by Noah Vaughn

Jordan91

Supporters
1 hour ago, ImDirtydan01 said:

I hate to say this, but was Manning ever THAT good? I’m not saying he was ever that bad. But I watched a clip from a high school game of his where he was being chased down and seemingly trying to scan the field, but of course that was at the 3A or 4A level in Louisiana, so he could easily outrun the defense. But I don’t want to just say he was always overrated to begin with, because we saw glimpses of how good he can be in 2024, and at the end of last year, he was pretty good. That’s why I’m at a crossroads of whether the criticisms of him were right to a degree all along or if this is Sark’s doing. Obviously, it is to some degree because we’ve seen two five-star quarterbacks year over year become a shell of what they were to begin with. 

I don’t want to fully cut ties with Sark yet, but I’m just about there as it is. I want the best for Arch, even if it’s not at Texas. But is it possible we’re seeing the same thing that Weigman went through? He looked horrible at A&M, and now he actually looks good with a competent OC that tailored the offense to his specific skillset instead of trying to make him something he’s not. Yes, it’s in the Big 12, but with the way Arch is playing, he would be getting clobbered in that conference as well. 

I feel like the answer is somewhat in-between. Arch has issues of his own and the way Sark has coached him. But I’d hate to think he’d go somewhere else and look like a good game manager to a very, very good quarterback. Because if he goes somewhere else and balls out, I’d really hate to still be stuck with Sark. That would be the biggest red flag on Sark’s development for quarterbacks at Texas, if there already isn’t one, of course. 
 

Thoughts and opinions on this question will be greatly appreciated @Gerry Hamilton. @Jeff Howe

What’s worse? Arch was never that good? Sark managed to get back to back five start quarterbacks and not develop them?

Jordan91

Supporters
17 minutes ago, Glass Joe said:

He’s not.  The entire offense is just Sark joysticking the plays he designs, he likes, he is certain demonstrate his schematic brilliance.

The players are just mindless robots used as props by the brilliant puppetmaster himself.

Wait until you see what Arch can become at Miami next season under the tutelage of a real OC like Shannon Dawson.

Sark is just John Mackovic 2.0, complete with the bogus, unworthy reputation for offensive brilliance and the arrogance that leads to the failure.

Manning has been around the best his whole life. He’s been taught essentially since he was five. Freezing on a blitz, not throwing it away, not seeing the field. Those are all things Manning has already been shown his whole life. Not worried at all about how he would thrive somewhere else. Those are fundamentals the family has burned into his head. The switch will not suddenly flip with a new OC.

Crusher Crew

Supporters
51 minutes ago, MBHORNSFAN said:

 

Then he should be popped immediately.  And if not he will be soon enough then. 

We might get run out of the stadium Saturday night against Ole Miss.  I don't expect that to happen, against my better judgment I am thinking our guys will somehow find a way to make this competitive and maybe even win. Maybe they have some pride.   But, a 45-10 drubbing is definitely possible.

I don't know the ins and outs but I think Sark's buyout is $36mil.  Not impossible.  Glad to see you here @MBHORNSFAN, I came over from OB then IT.  

The question after that is who do you F'n hire?  Chesney?  Stein?  Traylor?  I've always liked Matt Ruhle but the fact we are even having this discussion is simply mind blowing. 

Tyler Totten

Supporters
(edited)

Jeff he needs to be benched like ewers. That’s it he played great second half of last year he’s on Garrett Gilbert level bullshit with the most talented roster in cfb and I’ll add this if his name wasn’t manning and the price they paid for him. Lacey would start. Either sark pulls hurts and go with tua. Or sark does nothing Saban won a natty and pulled hurts. We will have our answer soon. 

Edited by Tyler Totten

Lonestar knifemaker

Supporters

I’ve noticed our line can’t deal with a delayed blitz. I see teams holding off for a second while our plodding big humans try to pull and then shooting the gap created. Kills us every single time. 

Horn365

Supporters

Does the QB help with protection calls? Can a change at QB improve the oline?

Califashorn75

Members
(edited)

Do we have a sports psychologist on staff? Arch is lacking confidence and appears depressed. He needs his mojo back. I wonder if the Holly Rowe thing messed up his mind. He hasn't been the same since that bruhaha. 

Edited by Califashorn75

AusMOJO

Members
5 hours ago, Jeff Howe said:

This is the RPO I mentioned.

If it's a predetermined give, it's a terrible call. If it's a true read, it's a terrible decision:

 

Just last year he would've easily pulled this and ran for the TD. This year apparently he can't do a basic RPO. I really do wonder what Sark is saying to him before each play or doing with him in practice. Because none of this makes sense to me. He looked different in 2024 compared to 2025 and now he looks worse in 2026 than he did in 2025. 

AusMOJO

Members
5 hours ago, Nate C said:

Bad offensive line play hurts my soul more than anything. A good offensive line fixes a lot of issues but this one is just terrible. Arch is obviously struggling badly but this line has done nothing to help him. I’m not sure what all Sark can do at this point. QB can’t hit the short ones. Lineman can’t block for the long ones. No one communicates at the LOS. head scratcher 

OL comes back to scheme and ultimately Sark. Everything wrong circles back to Sark. It's that simple really. Arch's regression from 2024 to 2026 is crazy. How he has kept the same offensive coaches outside of RB for several years now and still the same results. But good thing we got rid of PK so he can focus on the O now....

AusMOJO

Members
4 hours ago, Glass Joe said:

He’s not.  The entire offense is just Sark joysticking the plays he designs, he likes, he is certain demonstrate his schematic brilliance.

The players are just mindless robots used as props by the brilliant puppetmaster himself.

Wait until you see what Arch can become at Miami next season under the tutelage of a real OC like Shannon Dawson.

Sark is just John Mackovic 2.0, complete with the bogus, unworthy reputation for offensive brilliance and the arrogance that leads to the failure.

I've noticed this. Sark's scripts look great and to Rod B's point, he doesn't seem to adjust very well. So it kind of explains why the team looks great to start a game and then in between they look completely lost. Like he's just throwing play calls out there. 

As for Arch, I thought he'd maybe go the LSU route, team up with Kiffin. He's a lot of things but he can develop QB's and has a QB friendly offense. 

AusMOJO

Members
4 hours ago, Jordan91 said:

What’s worse? Arch was never that good? Sark managed to get back to back five start quarterbacks and not develop them?

Sark is sounding like Shaka 2.0 lol. Maybe that's an unfair comparison. But the fact that personnel has changed and the problems persist. From year to year, that should tell us who the problem is. 

All off-season what did we hear non-stop "we needed the change at DC to be more physical and aggressive"...."we're going to be a more physical team"..blah, blah, blah.

Yet Will Stein first year HC with a team he put together from the portal, is way more physical at the LoS than we are. He plays to his players strengths and schemes things up well.

Now this isn't a "hire Will Stein" post, just that if a first year HC has it more figured out than you after 3 years in the SEC and 6 years at the helm of a blue blood program. What the heck are you doing? You wanted all these "big human's" and they look like they couldn't push a 90 year old grandma out of the way. 

AusMOJO

Members
4 hours ago, Crusher Crew said:

We might get run out of the stadium Saturday night against Ole Miss.  I don't expect that to happen, against my better judgment I am thinking our guys will somehow find a way to make this competitive and maybe even win. Maybe they have some pride.   But, a 45-10 drubbing is definitely possible.

I don't know the ins and outs but I think Sark's buyout is $36mil.  Not impossible.  Glad to see you here @MBHORNSFAN, I came over from OB then IT.  

The question after that is who do you F'n hire?  Chesney?  Stein?  Traylor?  I've always liked Matt Ruhle but the fact we are even having this discussion is simply mind blowing. 

I like Traylor, but they're not going to spend all that money buying out Sark and his coaching staff to go hire a G6 HC. I like Matt Rhule but I'm not sure he would be on the list either. Chesney I actually like, I believe he came from JMU and is having a good amount of success at UCLA.

It's hard to decide who to hire, I'm sure CDC and the people around him have a short list. Right now all we can do is hope by some miracle Sark figures it out and they go on some 6-0 run and make the playoffs and make a run there.

Right now I'm struggling to see it. 

Alex Butler

Supporters

This article could have been two letters: N.O. LOL

in sec country

Supporters
(edited)
8 hours ago, Jeff Howe said:

To the point of the article, after rewatching the game and breaking things down as best as I could, that might be the worst I've seen Arch look. Sark isn't off the hook by any stretch (and neither is the offensive line), but it was indefensible.

Calling for a quarterback change is usually a last resort for me and I'm closer to that point than I should be.

Quarterback change should be a last resort, but we've reached that point.

The question - on the aforementioned zone read did Arch have the option to pull it? If not, what the hell is Sark doing? 

Of course we also need "true" RPOs. Are they even in the playback?

Time to see what KJ can do.  It may even boost the offensive line.

Edited by in sec country

Jack R

Supporters

Jeff, I seem to recall about this time last year AJ moving to the box to help out. Is that still the case or is he on the field? 

Lil_Horn_Big_Horn

Supporters

Jeff how many sacks, pressures, contact behind the line and tfl have we had since flood has been there and it compared to other oline coaches? 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Add a comment...

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.