Jump to content
  • It’s time to revisit On Texas Football's “One Burning Question,” where we ask a question about the Texas Longhorns heading into a game.

    Entering Saturday’s 27-24 loss to Florida, the burning question was:

    Can Steve Sarkisian and Arch Manning get on the same page?

    They didn’t. It was bad enough that Sarkisian must at least entertain a quarterback change.

    Sarkisian is ultimately to blame for the Texas (4-2, 1-2 SEC) offense woefully underperforming.

    He assembled a roster he believed could execute his offense at a championship level. After Saturday’s loss to the Gators, the Longhorns rank among the worst offenses in the country in total offense (93rd), yards per play (tied for 104th), rushing offense (102nd), 10-yard plays from scrimmage (tied for 81st) and 20-yard plays from scrimmage (tied for 126th).

    Nevertheless, things came to a head in Sarkisian’s 19th consecutive game with Manning as his starting quarterback. Another week of blown opportunities, missed assignments, poor decision-making and Manning’s catastrophic mistakes overshadowing his positive plays might force Sarkisian to make a move that seemed unfathomable a few weeks ago.

    Sarkisian had hot routes to help Manning handle blitzes. He simplified his quarterback’s reads. There were run-pass options where Manning could've used his legs to jumpstart the offense.

    Manning, however, didn’t execute enough of those things to keep the offense from another feast-or-famine outing. Whether Manning isn’t confident enough to pull the trigger, can’t process what’s unfolding in front of him or is locked onto a predetermined read at all times, Sarkisian can no longer field an offense in which the starting quarterback needs training wheels.

    Manning’s inability to get rid of the football on time cost the offense time and again against Florida, most notably on Myles Graham’s strip-sack that ended Texas’ comeback bid. Manning appeared to have Emmett Mosley V open on an out route, but he held the ball too long and succumbed to pressure, for the fifth and final time (the Longhorns have allowed 17 sacks in three games and are tied for 117th in FBS by allowing 2.83 sacks per game), resulting in a game-clinching turnover.

    On second-and-3 from the Gators’ 16-yard line in the second quarter, Manning appeared to miss a pull read on a run-pass option. Had he pulled the ball instead of handing it off to Hollywood Smothers for a 4-yard loss, Manning could’ve either run for the first down or flipped the ball to Nick Townsend, who was open after leaking into the flat and had a chance to score.

    Instead of taking a two-touchdown lead, Texas settled for a field goal.

    Manning doesn’t appear capable of getting the offense out of a bad play (multiple rushing attempts into an outnumbered box and waves of unblocked defenders coming free on blitzes) or changing protection with a pre-snap check at the line of scrimmage. He’s incapable of making those decisions or doesn’t have Sarkisian’s trust to do so, either of which would be a serious indictment of Manning’s development (or lack thereof).

    There’s no question now that Manning has regressed. Attributes that were his strengths (pocket awareness chief among them) have become weaknesses that are holding the offense back.

    Whether Manning’s confidence has eroded to the point that he can’t regain or rebuild it is a legitimate concern.

    Is he broken?

    Can he fix what’s ailing him?

    If he does, will it happen before the house of cards collapses?

    The Sarkisian-Manning era was on a championship trajectory after last month’s comeback win over Ohio State.

    Five weeks later, Sarkisian might be closer to pulling the plug and starting anew than he is to riding it out, waiting for Manning to get back on track.

    • Hook 'Em 14
    • Sad 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    9 hours ago, Jeff Howe said:

    To the point of the article, after rewatching the game and breaking things down as best as I could, that might be the worst I've seen Arch look. Sark isn't off the hook by any stretch (and neither is the offensive line), but it was indefensible.

    Calling for a quarterback change is usually a last resort for me and I'm closer to that point than I should be.

    The reasons for Lacey are thus:  Sark's inefficiency in play calling has caused hesitancy and confusion in his QB and also in the OL; confidence is at an all time low.  Changing to Lacey forces Sark to simplify the offensive scheme, and they would function well, gaining confidence through the first half.  It would spread like a virus.

    9 hours ago, Jeff Howe said:

    It's a big few weeks for Sark's future, for sure. I've wrapped my head around the fact that these are rational, real conversations.

    Crazy to think we are where we are after how the end of last year went for us and after beating OSU I never imagined we would be talking about having one of the worst offenses we have had since the Gilbert days. Smh 

    1 hour ago, Jeff Howe said:

    He’s still in the booth.

    I'd love to get a behind the scenes view into the program. Because there are so many issues that I am left scratching my head over. I'm so disappointed. I feel bad for the players and the fans. 

    After the 10-3 season last year, it seemed pretty obvious to me that the issues revolved around our offensive line and our inability to run the ball. But all of our offseason changes with coaches and players revolved around other areas. We replaced our defensive coordinator, which seemed odd given the defense was not the problem. We replaced our RB coach and our top RBs. We openly recruited OL help that were really good pass blockers but not very good run blockers. We just needed to get more physical and cohesive with our ability to run the ball but we tinkered with everything else. 

    The Sark era also seems to have a pattern. Offense is really good during our scripted plays and then we look totally lost, confused, and weak the rest of the game.

    6 minutes ago, Marcus Villanueva said:

    Stop blaming Arch and Sark.  If the defense would do their job and get a 2-3 pick 6's each game we would barely need the offense 🙃

    First it was PK. Now it’s Arch and Flood. Next it’ll be another round of assistants sacrificed to save the offensive genius. Six years, countless excuses, and somehow the guy who hired the coaches, recruited the players, built the offense, and calls the plays is the only one who escapes accountability. At some point, you run out of people to blame and have to admit the guy holding the clipboard is the problem.




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.