Jump to content

Alex Butler

Supporters
  • Posts

    1826
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

2741 profile views

Alex Butler's Achievements

Lifetime Longhorn

Lifetime Longhorn (9/9)

  • One Year In
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Conversation Starter
  • Very Popular
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

2.4k

Reputation

  1. Good, Burke will prove them wrong and Jelani can come back with Kanu and Wisner and roll some MF’ers hard next year. Best of luck to Mr. Guilbeau, unfortunate he didn’t shine at CB but is a talented star, physical run defender, and might translate well into a safety and special teams force in the NFL.
  2. We want more Niblett!! Would love to see his role increase next season. Really hoping to hear more glowing reviews from Lockett and Ffrench. Excited to see MT3 and how the DNs are growing up. Kade Phillips report? Williams injured again is not a positive sign at all. What do we think about JJR getting run at safety along with Hicks?
  3. Let’s go Hero!! Another year and that dude could be a first rounder! If we keep JMcD and get some young guys playing fast and confident our defense could be better than it was this year and we were pretty darn good all things considered!!
  4. Wait Quinn is going back to college to show Beck up hahaha?!?! The canes could probably beat the dolphins just like in the old days when they took a pay cut to go to the NFL 😂😂😂
  5. What about Ffrench and Lockett emerging as playmakers too? Those guys were highly rated prospects. Lockett especially is big and looks like he’d be a big asset in the screen game and blocking with Moseley. I’m more interested in focusing on OL,LB , RB, and secondary in the portal rather than trying to find a WR. Honestly, I think with Moseley and Livingstone you have two very dependable big catch radius guys. Wingo’s hands leave much to be desired but if he can find a way to fix that with all that talent I think we’re good at WR.
  6. Facts!!! Love it! Look last season alone neither OSU nor ND would’ve been in the BCS or the 4 team playoff.
  7. Disagree, we’re seeing bad football because these guys play such varying levels of competition early in the season.
  8. Nope, don’t think that would be the case. I think you’d see the best football we’ve ever seen. You still have to win to get in and you’re making everything more like the NFL. The value is having the playoff structured in a way that eliminates conference championship games, which IMO punish teams that finish strong in conference, and replace them with play in games. Setting limits and numbers on who gets in would devalue regular season just like it is currently trending.
  9. I guess you have an aversion to quality football games all season haha 😂
  10. Disagree. A team that plays good teams should have a chance to keep playing. Keeps fans and schools interested. I don’t care how many losses they have I’d rather see good football and teams grow into a championship team like the NFL. If we could live with the old model for as long as we did we can live with teams with 4+ losses. I’d prefer to expand to 24 just to get more teams a shot.
  11. No floor, the best 16 teams get in. It’s very possible that in the SEC with a 9 game conference schedule and a required p4 non-conference game that a team could lose early in the season against good competition and build throughout the season. We don’t want to have record limits set. That’s how we get auto qualifiers for the G5 teams because Duke at 8-5 was ranked below JMU and Tulane. I’d rather see Duke get smoked by Ole Miss than Tulane twice in the same season.
  12. What about tech? It’s not out of the realm of possibility as bad as Lubbock is they definitely pay well. I wouldn’t mind seeing him there.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.