All Activity
- Past hour
-
Perfect, a coach who can’t seem to coach.
-
The reasons for Lacey are thus: Sark's inefficiency in play calling has caused hesitancy and confusion in his QB and also in the OL; confidence is at an all time low. Changing to Lacey forces Sark to simplify the offensive scheme, and they would function well, gaining confidence through the first half. It would spread like a virus.
-
I thought the problem was he isn’t changing people.
-
Quarterback change should be a last resort, but we've reached that point. The question - on the aforementioned zone read did Arch have the option to pull it? If not, what the hell is Sark doing? Of course we also need "true" RPOs. Are they even in the playback? Time to see what KJ can do. It may even boost the offensive line.
-
Ive been wrong w every forcast- prediction … sounds about right bout me n Texas commentary!
-
Well wherever he is, I miss talking to him. He was also fun to chat with in the DM's and he was right about what he said.
-
Some say he may be under a different username now tho 👀
-
Okay to be fair, Florida didn't change QB's, the starter got hurt.
-
Ah damn, I thought I saw he got unbanned.
- Today
-
#fireflood
-
He got banned
-
He’s washed. Not a chance.
-
Well I put it on Sark, you recruited him, you've "developed" him and you put this offensive talent together, including the OL. So we can pass the buck all we want but he's the guy who has to take responsibility. Why is your 4th year QB in his 2nd year starting regressing every year? If he's no good, bench him. Just know it'll be a serious blow to your QB credentials though and everyone will talk about how you completely destroyed a Manning's development. It will look even worse if he goes elsewhere and balls out in his final year. Either way, he needs to make a decision because his future is riding on it. He also has some tough off-season decisions to make on his coaching staff and support staff. That's assuming the wheel's don't fall off and we're looking for a new head guy.
-
Is this the solution to the offense?
AusMOJO replied to OTFBrandon's topic in On Texas Football Forum
You're not doing any of this mid season. Who on the staff is good enough to call plays? Change the identity of the Offense to what? Because we can't even figure out what the current identity is. Changing the QB is plausible, but what happens when it looks like more of the same without the script? -
The only one who did seems to be Kirby Smart, imo.
-
Hey where's Hashtag, it feels like he should be here talking his ish. Remember when everyone pretty much ran him off for saying this exact stuff last year?
-
I'm not giving him credit for developing Banks. That dude was going to be a stud no matter where he went. Williams was an okay development. He did okay with Christian Jones. I'll give some credit for Goosby but he has his issues and Siani has been getting worse each week. Baker on the inside doesn't seem like he's adjusted well, Sikorski is okay but has slow feet but he doesn't get pushed back a ton. Robertson is okayish, not strong enough, gets pushed back more than Majors did. Campbell was okay, too. Had a mean streak but never really seemed to hit his stride. Huston was okay but never really seemed to develop past his Fr year, for whatever reason. Umeozulu, I've no idea what happened with that dude. Stroh was a disaster but I don't think it was the young man's fault. Chapman, I think you mean Chatman? Haven't really seen dude outside of the spring stuff. Cruz was the supposed air apparent at C and he hasn't seen much playing time at NC State, I believe. Kibble is the starting LG for Baylor. Nick Brooks was disappointing but got put in a terrible situation. Had never played G and Flood just threw him in there and he looked terrible (understandably). I think he's second string RT at Bama? Merill and Karic were Herman hold overs.
-
Sark needs this kind of Augie intensity
AusMOJO replied to Roy Hinojosa's topic in On Texas Football Forum
Sark only gets like this when CJ asks him a question. -
I like Traylor, but they're not going to spend all that money buying out Sark and his coaching staff to go hire a G6 HC. I like Matt Rhule but I'm not sure he would be on the list either. Chesney I actually like, I believe he came from JMU and is having a good amount of success at UCLA. It's hard to decide who to hire, I'm sure CDC and the people around him have a short list. Right now all we can do is hope by some miracle Sark figures it out and they go on some 6-0 run and make the playoffs and make a run there. Right now I'm struggling to see it.
-
Sark is sounding like Shaka 2.0 lol. Maybe that's an unfair comparison. But the fact that personnel has changed and the problems persist. From year to year, that should tell us who the problem is. All off-season what did we hear non-stop "we needed the change at DC to be more physical and aggressive"...."we're going to be a more physical team"..blah, blah, blah. Yet Will Stein first year HC with a team he put together from the portal, is way more physical at the LoS than we are. He plays to his players strengths and schemes things up well. Now this isn't a "hire Will Stein" post, just that if a first year HC has it more figured out than you after 3 years in the SEC and 6 years at the helm of a blue blood program. What the heck are you doing? You wanted all these "big human's" and they look like they couldn't push a 90 year old grandma out of the way.