All Activity
- Past hour
-
I think that Sark and Herman both have this issue that their offense is too mediocre to ever get separation and blow people out. With Strong we were just hoping to win the damn game, let alone blow someone out. Back in the Mack days when our offense could score 40 points regularly we didn't have this problem and the backups played plenty. The main flaw with Mack is that he'd put in the backup QB but never let him throw the ball. So at that particular position we didn't get any meaningful experience.
-
Banks is gone, weirdo aggie. Actually surprised he lasted 2 years with Saban. And you can’t have the means we have and have a bad o-line for this long. Figure it out, good grief. Figuring it out would be start over and get what you need for next year. Dont care about sark calling plays or not, but put someone in the booth that could call plays.
-
Yea I mean an "ultimatum" is not required here. You say look Sark, you being your own OC is obviously not working. It's time to bring in the offensive version of Muschamp and step back into purely head coaching role. If Sark still can't see this very obvious picture after what has taken place this season, then we don't want this guy in charge of our program and need to eat the buyout. This should not require any significant convincing.
-
At seasons end regardless of what happens banks needs to be given one task and we need to find a legit special teams coach, flood has to be shown the door, and sark should be told to find a young and upcoming OC that he can help with play calling. Sark is really good at designing plays but seems to get in his head for parts of the game and go back to throwing deep all the time instead of analyzing the game and see what's working. Also we need to give muschamp a raise, make him one of the highest DCs.
-
Serious question, but does an ultimatum end up working out? At the end of the day if you’re a head coach that can’t operate the team the way you want then how are you going to be successful? I think he has to willingly make the changes you mentioned or Texas should move on. People will say there aren’t better options, but you can’t keep doing the same thing each year and hope for the best. Not with the amount of NIL this program spends.
-
and....we STILL lost to them! 🙄
-
OL, OL, OL. Our OL is and has been a complete disgrace. We did have Banks and Cam Williams, but the only reason we got those two was because Cristobal took off for Miami last minute. Goolsby was a diamond in the rough 3 star guy that everyone missed. Us and A&M were his only 2 big offers. Without a functioning OL, all the weapons we have will continue to go to complete waste.
-
Which of these jobs is Banks qualified to keep at this point? Our TE room is dreary and our special teams unit is a national laughingstock.
-
Hire an OC you would want to be play caller if you couldn’t do it. Separate the job of Jeff Banks into two different divisions of labor. ST and TE. Figure out what’s wrong with the OL. If it’s coaching or just the fact that you need new blood, then make the call.
-
Two years in a row of his offense looking completely putrid so changes must be made.
- Today
-
This is Texas football. We play junior and senior starters mostly, at QB or any other position. The next year there is a crisis because we have no one with playing experience.
-
If he really believes that it's just asinine logic. I do think there is like a ~50% chance we just fire him and eat the buyout. And if he actually thinks what you and Hank are saying then that is probably exactly what goes down. But again, short of some kind of miracle run to finish the year, I'll be absolutely shocked if Sark is his own OC again in 2027. It will be either a new HC or new OC IMO.
-
I do agree with that part, too. As I watch freshmen contribute all over, we have juniors that are lost.
-
Based on what was said by hank at the top of this thread is what i am really starting to believe. Sark was hired here for his ability to call plays at bama, So getting an OC would be him waving the white flag that he failed. If i am him, But i am too stubborn, hard headed and unwilling to relinquish play calling duties gracefully find a way out through either a job in the NFL or resigning.
-
I don't get when you think we should have put him in? The score was 24-3 with 10 minutes left in the game. That would be insane to put Lacey in there. Then we scored and it was 31-3. After that Lacey came in.... To get to backups earlier we have to blow the other team out. That just didn't happen until the middle of Q4.
-
Sark as an OC is like Manny Diaz was when he was at Texas. The "play calls" might be good on paper but they are also absolutely delusional. The team has clearly demonstrated it cannot execute Sark's preferred offensive scheme for multiple years now. You can't call a play that we fail to execute 80% of the time and then act shocked when we screw it up yet again. You are right about a 24/7 OC, but we also need a new scheme that is easier for college players to execute. This scheme just plain sucks. Then it is poorly coached on top of that lol.
-
CDC won't can Sark with the buyout, plus there isn't a guaranteed better replacement, but I do think he would give him an ultimatum. He needs to replace the OL and special teams coaches and probably hire an OC. Look at our defense. They show what can be assembled when you have UT's resources playing in the SEC in big games every week. There is no excuse for us to not have one of the best OL's in football. Whether it's selection of the players, their development, or their scheme, that's all on Flood (and Sark). It's not Sark as a play caller that is the issue but rather that a team at this level deserves an OC that spends 24/7 coming up with ways to beat the next team's defense. Recruiting, fund raising, interviews, etc are too much.
-
Agreed. He got a mulligan for 2025. After 2026 there is absolutely no way he is allowed to come back and stink up DKR with his offense again in 2027. If he is back at all there will be a coordinator hire for sure.
-
Sarks mulligan was canning PK and hiring Muschamp because he insisted his offensive issues were because he was baby sitting the defense and could not focus on his offense.
-
You Are Sark...
Assistant Regional Manager replied to mmdaytontexas's topic in On Texas Football Forum
He gave it up at USC to Clay Helton at one point so there is precedent. He also never said he’ll never give it up here. He said he wasn’t giving it up 15 minutes after we lost to OU in the middle of the season. There is a difference. If his options are give up playcalling or stop making $11 million a year, I’ll bet you which one he chooses. -
I definitely don't believe that. Sark had goodwill from two semifinal appearances and he got a mulligan for last year. Short of this team somehow winning out and making a run in the playoffs (😂🤣😂🤣😂) there is not going to be another mulligan.
-
where is Sark gonna go? 😂😂😂 I agree with you
-
He’s telling you they already gave him that ultimatum, Sark already refused once.
-
I don't doubt this might be Sark's preference but there is absolutely no chance the AD and boosters funding the NIL operation will accept this. If Sark is back it will be with an actual offensive coordinator being hired.
-
Injuries happen in football and this is what recruiting is for, improvise adapt overcome