All Activity

that was a statistics answer.

Yeah, he may not go as high. But Matas is a better college player than Allen IMO.

I do think Day will keep his job but if not they might actually be able to get Freeman. That would keep a fair amount of the roster intact and he could probably poach a few ND guys as well, but it would also open Notre Dame up and there's not really a clear hire for that job. There's also not a clear hire for Ohio State if Freeman tells them no

Agreed!!!

Would make a much better drive back and nice cap to the end of my last football regular season as a student, should be an amazing environment and experience nonetheless.

This is great stuff @TheSingletron ! Watching the games it feels like he gets better as the game goes on and I love that these numbers back that up The pint-sized playmaker!

Love it @PaytonOTF I’m worried about this game and getting out of BR with a win!!

Lincoln is going to end up in Lubbock eventually. Just a matter of time.

Is that just Apple or is Youtube included in that?

Thanks Jordan, seems like the horns were in it for him for a little while.

Turnovers will be imperative, not forcing any against Tennessee made that game closer than it should’ve been. Leavitt will put the ball in harms way, and winning 4th down defensively off Kiffin’s aggressiveness like we saw last week could turn the tide of that QB difference if the offense struggles.

Seeing how many mayo corndogs @CJ Vogel can put away would be great…

Texas needs to create a ton of pressure and avoid sacks/negative plays. We can’t win a game in BR like we did in Knoxville the QB difference is too much and we won’t be able to match or exceed their sack numbers.

Payton here, one of the OTF interns, back with this week’s By the Numbers. With LSU up next, I dug into the matchup I think decides Saturday night: the Texas offensive line against the LSU front seven. The numbers are lopsided. LSU has 36 sacks through nine games, third in the FBS. Texas has allowed 27, which is tied for 124th out of 138 teams. Tackles for loss tell a similar story. LSU ranks 12th in the country with 65. Texas ranks 135th in tackles for loss allowed with 71. For LSU, pressure has been the whole season. When the Tigers get three or more sacks, they are 6-0. When they get fewer than three, they are 0-3. The tackles for loss split is identical: 6-0 with seven or more, 0-3 with fewer. In all three losses, to Ole Miss, Kentucky and Alabama, LSU finished with exactly three tackles for loss. That is the problem for Texas this saturday. The Longhorns allow 3.0 sacks and 7.9 tackles for loss a game, both above the benchmark where LSU has not lost. And it has gotten even worse in conference play. Of the 27 sacks Texas has allowed, 23 have come in six SEC games. Texas has given up three or more sacks in four of those six, and seven or more tackles for loss in five of them. The good news is that Texas has shown it can win anyway. The Longhorns gave up five sacks against Mississippi State and won. Pressure has not decided Texas’s season the way it has decided LSU’s. Texas has also seen a front like this once already. Tennessee leads the country in sacks and got to Arch Manning six times in Knoxville, and Texas still won. LSU ranks third. If the line holds the Tigers under three sacks, history says Texas wins. If it does not, the Longhorns will have to do what they did at Tennessee and win despite the pressure. Can this line keep LSU under three sacks in Death Valley, or does Texas need to win it the way it did at Tennessee?

Yuck! So glad he didn’t. Nahlin is classless.

The OTF Crew will host a corn dog and mayonnaise eating competition.

Iivestream while skydiving?

Bobby/CJ: WHAT IS THE EXACT number of subscribers to OTF you tube?

I will die

Great information!!!! 🤘🏼🤘🏼

I posted before the season that I expected our running back room to be more explosive based on just watching Raleek (and Hollywood) move. Now, I think our running game has fell so far below expectations for various rooms but Raleek is showing us the potential. I've been looking at some of Raleek Brown's numbers compared to other SEC running backs, and I think there's a legitimate argument that he's making considerably more of his opportunities than we realize. Through nine games, Brown has ONLY 109 carries for 537 yards, 18 receptions, and 8 total touchdowns. He's averaging just 12.1 carries per game, compared to 23.2 for Missouri's Jamal Roberts, 21.8 for Tennessee's DeSean Bishop, and 18.4 for LSU's Dilin Jones. But here's where the numbers get interesting. 1. Explosive Run Rate (10+ Yards) Percentage of carries resulting in gains of 10+ yards: Raleek Brown (Texas): 14.7% DeSean Bishop (Tennessee): 12.8% Jamal Roberts (Missouri): 12.0% Jadan Baugh (Florida): 11.9% Dilin Jones (LSU): 10.8% Brown is generating explosive runs at a higher rate than all four of the SEC's most heavily utilized running backs. 2. Fourth-Quarter Explosiveness This might be my favorite statistic. Brown: 8 runs of 10+ yards on just 28 carries. Roberts: 7 runs of 10+ yards on 53 carries. Bishop: 7 runs of 10+ yards on 62 carries. Brown is averaging 6.6 yards per carry in the fourth quarter and has generated more 10+ yard runs than either of those backs despite receiving roughly half the opportunities. 3. Touchdown Production Per Touch Brown has scored 8 touchdowns on 127 offensive touches. That's a touchdown every 15.9 touches. Compare that to: Jamal Roberts: 10 TDs on 225 touches (22.5 touches per TD). Dilin Jones: 7 TDs on 203 touches (29 touches per TD). Brown has actually scored more touchdowns than Jones despite having 76 fewer touches. I hope we lean in heavy to Raleek!

Just take a huge dump and look at it and it’s what I look like

You eating street tacos while Blake eats dominoes live thoughts?

@Joe Z face reveal

A lifetime supply of street tacos