Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. This. What sent me over the edge is seeing Sark in these press conferences be completely unable to acknowledge that anything has gone wrong. Strongly disagree with OP about Sark being the OC. OC is a full time job. Sark was a good OC 5 years ago but he has fallen behind big time. There is not enough time in the day for him to run our program and stay current as an elite OC. The results of his piss poor offense speak for themselves.
  3. Being at#17 fair to say we aren't making the playoffs period. Anything that might happen should begin day after A& M game or for sure after signing day early December . No time to waste , too much to do whether Sark stays goes whatever. Gotta get through signing day then who the hell knows honestly.
  4. How many 5 stars didnt oan out? Banks, Campbell Hill, Simmons? Baxter is because if injuries. So not sure what 5 stars you are referring to
  5. I have had my frustrations with Sark, but I trust he will be very motivated going in to this offseason. Call it arrogance but he seems annoyed of the criticism (although some is valid). I haven’t given up on him one bit. Plenty of production returning next year. Make the right moves in the portal and the appropriate staff adjustments. This time he doesn’t have to rebuild...just reload.
  6. Today
  7. I'm not sure where to post this or if it was even worth starting a new thread. But I got a good laugh out of this video that came across my feed. Already saw one Texas fan make a post there but most of it is OU, A&M, Georgia and Bama fans tearing us a new one for being entitled and all that. Go have a read and get a good laugh, this is really what they think of us. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwdKbZCWb9M
  8. I think the fair thing to say is that the expectation is to always compete for a championship, meaning being in contention for a chance to win it all at the end of the regular season.
  9. You should re-read that post
  10. Seems harsh. Sure a Naty is the goal. Only 1 team a year succeeds at that. Disappointment for teams & fans that thought they’d reach that goal but didn’t. Having a disappointing season isn’t sunshine & rainbows. But labeling anything less than a Naty as “failed” - nah that’s not for me. Horns up always. 🤘
  11. Fair enough. In any case, someone needs to figure out where the hell our NIL budget went? How did we not have dry powder for RB and OL? We have to be smarter on the moneyball front or we aren't winning anything in this era.
  12. Sark wants to act like he didn’t bring up playing for a championship in the offseason. He did it but wants to jump on anyone that even suggests it now. Arrogance at its finest.
  13. Extremely good program builder IMO.
  14. He is not too close to the players to make harsh NIL decisions. He’s done it every year.
  15. You don’t speak for everyone here. 1. There’s a reason the back to back playoff appearance actually hasn’t run its course. He did it. Name another coach who did. I’ll stand by and wait. 2. Texas didn’t get in the playoffs because of FSU. Texas was the no. 3 seed in the playoffs, not 4. 3. Acting like close wins don’t count is the same as acting like close losses don’t. It’s asinine. You’re clearly anti-Sark. That’s fine. I’m not going to change you, but stop crapping on every thread like you think what you believe is actually what the greater fanbase does.
  16. I've never said we should fire him, just that he desperately needs an OC. I also think the model of an independent personnel arm is going to be better going forward. Sark is too close to the players to make the hard NIL decisions and as a result we blew a giant budget on a mediocre team.
  17. Don't forget that all the issues we see this year, were there the previous 4 years. But because of NIL and the portal, he was able to cover dis own deficiencies. Thinking that Sark is going to change his approach on things is wrong. He isn't going to do that, that is reality. He is what he is. Don't forget the two semi-final runs had a bunch of games that were close that shouldn't have been. We are also lucky not to lose 2-3 more games already this year. Having the fear of not being able to find a better HC if he does decide to leave is hilarious though. That would mean you guys don't trust CDC or Eltife to find someone to continue steering the program in the right direction, which is funny because everyone always praises them for all the work that has been done in the athletic department (especially CDC). I don't really care what happens either way. Just want to see a better product on the field than what has been put out there. Right now, Sark doesn't think anything is wrong just that we've been unlucky or whatever.
  18. we need mean SOBs on the oline that can actually move someone. it is pathetic we can’t find 5 people that can’t do that with our resources.
  19. Sark is good but just needs to adapt more instead of staying stubborn. If he can adapt than he will be fine. If he can’t adjust then this conversation will hold a lot more weight next year. Arch and Sark seem to be tied to the hip, plus if im an NFL team Sark has done nothing to prove he can be anything but an OC at the NFL level, his teams have been too up and down for the level of talent on the field. This year has been disappointing for sure, but Sark leaving this specific year would be worse for the program than better. Of course if his heart isn’t in it or does have one foot out the door than we should look elsewhere. But for better or for worse, Sark is the guy in charge.
  20. Taking y’all a while to diagnose Carlton is flipping.
  21. You clearly don’t remember the Charlie Strong Era. The grass isn’t always greener….
  22. I see a lot of stuff written about, will we get in the playoffs at 9-3 when the talk should be, we need to worry about not going 7-5. Plenty of football to play in the next 2 weeks. We better bring it.
  23. Yesterday
  24. Does the delay have anything to do with the Sark rumors?
  25. Starting 5 at beginning of the year: Goosby - 3rd year Stroh - 3rd year Hutson - 4th year Campbell - 4th year Baker - 2nd year 5 star, was expected to contribute early Neto - 4th year Facts
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.