Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Those two scenarios are the most likely way Texas makes it to the SEC Championship Game. I have added a third scenario in which Alabama wins all their other games and loses specifically to Oklahoma, Texas wins out, Texas A&M wins out before they lose to Texas, and Mississippi wins out. Texas would finish at the top of the SEC regular season standings and face Alabama in Atlanta. However, you have to wonder if winning your conference really means much in the expanded playoff era, especially in the B1G and SEC. Last season, winning a power level conference guaranteed you a first round bye, but that rule was changed after last season, and it just seems like an extra game of wear of tear with little to gain and a lot to lose. Maybe they could, similar to college basketball and college baseball, have a regular season SEC Champion trophy and an SEC Championship Game trophy when they expand to 16 teams and beyond.
  3. Yes, my wife has me baylen too, but it keeps me in shape and the stock fed.
  4. @Gerry Hamilton This tool aligns with the extended tie-breaking rules on the SEC's website: https://bball.notnothing.net/bracket_cloud.php?conf=secfb If Ole Miss, Texas A&M, and Texas all have 1 SEC loss, then it becomes a 3-team tie and the tiebreaker is common conference opponents, of which we'd lose to both due to our loss to Florida, even if we beat A&M. If A&M were to lose to Mizzou this week though and we end up in a 2-team tiebreaker with Ole Miss, Texas beating Georgia would propel Texas to the SEC title game.
  5. So glad to hear the prayers were answered. My ongoing prayer is he continues to thrive. God Bless you all!
  6. Thank you for sharing. Colt is a very brave young man. So glad he's doing great. That Range Rover will look great in the student parking lot his Junior year!
  7. Today
  8. Tre Wisner looks fantastic at pass pro. I don't remember him being that good at it last season. Chad Scott is earning his check!
  9. My wife got me into Baylen out loud 😂😂😂 I think some of the ticks are a little exaggerated but hilarious either way.
  10. That list is like a 40 degree day... no The Wire
  11. Well based on your list here, maybe it could be the 31st thing you'd watch before Tuesday MACtion!
  12. You NEVER WATCHED HOME IMPROVEMENT MODS BAN THIS MAN
  13. I’m assuming Moore heads to NFL and they assess whether the freshmen WRs are worth the price they’re commanding. If not you reduce their NIL (probably causing them to transfer) and make way for an AD / Golden / Bond type NFL bound upperclassmen to add to the returning group of four.
  14. Haha! Never watched Home Improvement, for whatever reason
  15. This is a great list. BODHI, I AM AN FBI AGENT 🤣 But no Home Improvement reruns for the 100th time??
  16. Probably a critical yet understated part of the early season discussion. Then to start the early season with guys banged up and missing time didn’t help.
  17. Akron was easy money on Tuesday night!
  18. The key to keeping OL depth will be proving that you can get them to the league IMO. Those young linemen have to develop somewhere, so it might as well be Texas.
  19. Moore was held out also to heal himself.
  20. Endries didn’t show up until summer. Moore was out all spring. Baxter was out all spring. Wisner was held out a bunch, too. Even Washington missed 90-percent of spring. Other than Livingstone, Arch did not get a chance to develop a rhythm with any of the top receivers this off-season IMO. Maybe that’s one of the reasons why he seemed to have a real connection with Livingstone over the others early in the year.
  21. Only way you go after Coleman is if someone leaves.
  22. We know Moseley was not good to start the season, and that Wingo missed some practice time, but is there more to it than that?
  23. You should have seen my coaches better than Rick Barnes post at the end of the Barnes era at Texas back in the day lol
  24. When I say inexperienced ... I mean a bunch of true freshman or RS littering depth charts. There isn't an excuse for that at the blue blood level. An OL, or player, that has been in a program developing 2/3 years before hitting the field isn't inexperienced for me. Difference between inexperienced and not having game experience. Problem with becoming portal dependent in OL recruiting with revenue sharing now here, you will have a very difficult time having the numbers you want on the OL, and the developmental piece. College coaches are very worried about this, quietly.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.