whereiend Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) It's a legit take that our defense was already pretty good, and making this change has risk to it. I personally think the analytics over rate PK a little. His style of play ("make them drive the entire field") is good for the defensive efficiency stats, but has two key flaws: 1.) It hurts our offense that they have to sit on the sidelines so much while the opponent dinks and dunks for easy first downs, 2.) the entire concept relies on college offenses not being able to put together complete drives. But what happens when we play elite teams and they actually can complete drives? I do long for a defense that makes the opponent fight for every first down, and I think that is the hope with Muschamp. Edited 2 hours ago by whereiend Quote
SarkNotSteven Posted 48 minutes ago Posted 48 minutes ago I like Adam, but disagree with him on Muschamp/PK… Adam’s eruption over CJ’s tweet on the halftime mariachi thing was priceless 🤣 1 Quote
MBHORNSFAN Posted 14 minutes ago Posted 14 minutes ago Adam is a moron. He also has said Petrino is better than Sark. He probably should stick to his lady bird lake serial killer conspiracies. Quote
General Grant Posted 13 minutes ago Posted 13 minutes ago 7 hours ago, drag worm said: He has some awful takes on sports. I’ll leave it at that to be nice. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.