ChanmanV Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago McDaniel's is running a lot of the same stuff Sark is. Quinn has looked really comfortable in these last 2 games. He's gained a lot of confidence in anticipating throws especially ones in tighter windows. I'm happy for him and hopes he keeps stacking good games. 1 Quote
Thanos72 Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 20 hours ago, NothinButDaHorns34 said: Hopefully EVERYBODY on this board who trashed quinn with the “start arch” crap was humbled with arch’s play early in this season and have a new found love for what quinn did for us. If we start Arch last year, the defense was strong enough to carry him until he started seeing things better. He’d also be exponentially better this year and we probably win at OSU and Florida. The reason to start Arch was to begin his development since we knew QE’s ceiling. So two things predictably happened. We neither won a natty nor got a jump on this year. It’s silly to reduce it to trashing Quinn. Quinn’s play determined his ceiling, not chat fodder. He had consistently demonstrated his ceiling. Nothing more, nothing less. 1 Quote
Here for the Wins Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 6 hours ago, Thanos72 said: If we start Arch last year, the defense was strong enough to carry him until he started seeing things better. He’d also be exponentially better this year and we probably win at OSU and Florida. The reason to start Arch was to begin his development since we knew QE’s ceiling. So two things predictably happened. We neither won a natty nor got a jump on this year. It’s silly to reduce it to trashing Quinn. Quinn’s play determined his ceiling, not chat fodder. He had consistently demonstrated his ceiling. Nothing more, nothing less. This is reasonable. We have no idea how Arch would have done last year because he didn’t play. He could have been better or worse. It is very likely that he was more prepared for this season had he played this season. Quote
HornsUpThumbsDown Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 6 hours ago, Thanos72 said: If we start Arch last year, the defense was strong enough to carry him until he started seeing things better. He’d also be exponentially better this year and we probably win at OSU and Florida. The reason to start Arch was to begin his development since we knew QE’s ceiling. So two things predictably happened. We neither won a natty nor got a jump on this year. It’s silly to reduce it to trashing Quinn. Quinn’s play determined his ceiling, not chat fodder. He had consistently demonstrated his ceiling. Nothing more, nothing less. Once we see “arch’s” ceiling we will compare. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.