Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

McDaniel's is running a lot of the same stuff Sark is. Quinn has looked really comfortable in these last 2 games. He's gained a lot of confidence in anticipating throws especially ones in tighter windows. I'm happy for him and hopes he keeps stacking good games. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
20 hours ago, NothinButDaHorns34 said:

Hopefully EVERYBODY on this board who trashed quinn with the “start arch” crap was humbled with arch’s play early in this season and have a new found love for what quinn did for us. 

If we start Arch last year, the defense was strong enough to carry him until he started seeing things better. He’d also be exponentially better this year and we probably win at OSU and Florida.

The reason to start Arch was to begin his development since we knew QE’s ceiling. So two things predictably happened. We neither won a natty nor got a jump on this year. It’s silly to reduce it to trashing Quinn. Quinn’s play determined his ceiling, not chat fodder. He had consistently demonstrated his ceiling. Nothing more, nothing less.

  • Haha 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Thanos72 said:

If we start Arch last year, the defense was strong enough to carry him until he started seeing things better. He’d also be exponentially better this year and we probably win at OSU and Florida.

The reason to start Arch was to begin his development since we knew QE’s ceiling. So two things predictably happened. We neither won a natty nor got a jump on this year. It’s silly to reduce it to trashing Quinn. Quinn’s play determined his ceiling, not chat fodder. He had consistently demonstrated his ceiling. Nothing more, nothing less.

This is reasonable.  We have no idea how Arch would have done last year because he didn’t play.  He could have been better or worse.

It is very likely that he was more prepared for this season had he played this season.

Posted
6 hours ago, Thanos72 said:

If we start Arch last year, the defense was strong enough to carry him until he started seeing things better. He’d also be exponentially better this year and we probably win at OSU and Florida.

The reason to start Arch was to begin his development since we knew QE’s ceiling. So two things predictably happened. We neither won a natty nor got a jump on this year. It’s silly to reduce it to trashing Quinn. Quinn’s play determined his ceiling, not chat fodder. He had consistently demonstrated his ceiling. Nothing more, nothing less.

Once we see “arch’s” ceiling we will compare. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.