Here for the Wins

Coleman 30 targets. 57% completion percentage. 4 interceptions. Wingo 28 targets. 75% completion percentage. 0 interceptions. Mosley 26 targets. 65% completion percentage. 1 interception.

I’d be in favor of changing the rule to state QB rather than passer.

A passer passes the ball. No one was calling him a QB.

I used to watch college basketball all the time. Now almost never. My interest didn’t really start until football ended. The frequent roster turnover is one element to lose interest. As for March Madness, opening weekend was the best. In part because it was somewhat easy for small school 5 beat or at least compete. Much more difficult to get 22. it basically took 1 year for people to say strength of schedule should matter so if it doesn’t, drop the marquee non-conference games and say no to G5 participants in the playoff.

Cooper needs to get upfield on the toss. Sometimes those 3 yards matter. Had a chance for a few more.

Where would Kobe recommend?

The Billy Pittman TD before half was the nail in the 2005 coffin. 2008 was awesome. The Cosby decleator as mentioned previously.

It’ll be a combination of all things. Versus UTSA, he a go route down the sideline. The ball is on him, no catch. On the goalline, he has a slant for a TD, but the Cb whips him. His path to the ball versus Ohio State, versus Tennessee weren’t the smoothest. I really have no idea how fast he is. And retrospectively many of highlights were with him making great catches against decent coverage. So not real sure he’s a great separator. If anything Cam should be upset? Not really. Wingo 25 targets, 19 catches, Mosley 12-21, Coleman 12-20. He’s been here the shortest time so it wouldn’t be surprising his rapport with the QB is less than the other two. He was brought here to help win it all. That’s still on the table.

Certainly could be. The Tenn one was tough. The UTSA ones stand out most in my mind. I’d just not force it to him. As a QB I can see the thought that he’s not getting enough looks so I need to look his way more often. Or that knowing he can go get it that you force it. This team shouldn’t be chasing numbers because there are multiple viable options.

I think he’s 4 of 8 on contested catches. UTSA whipped him once on a catchable ball and bodied him a bit on another. He can clearly make some spectacular catches. But……do we want to rely on 50/50 balls? You are effectively saying they’re a break even proposition. There’s an element of encouraging your QB to throw to a covered WR. There are several inherent issues in that.

Is Wingo faster and quicker? I think he’s better with the ball in his hands. If he checks those boxes, then he’s the guy to move around.

I’ve recorded and rewatched many of the games over the past 30-ish years. Many of those in person initially. Generally speaking I feel better after having rewatched the games. There has been an evolution of how I view things over that time. Live, I watch the ball. With rewatch you can see a lot more. Video has improved a great deal, rewind is better so the opportunities for clear viewing are better. I’d like to think my perspective is more rational as sometimes it takes multiple views of a play whereas players get one chance in real time.

I’m with you here. There are more of those 8-5 types that will be looking for an advantage. An extra non-conference loss would be detrimental. Nevermind that the extra mental and physical juice may result in less focus for some of the conference slate. Also, the number of home site games increases. Seedings matter and the most significant risk to that is an extra loss. For any team, they have to find a willing non-conference participant. So those that typically fall in that 16-32 range will have to think long and hard about whether they want to risk it.

How many of these videos have you watched? I am not talking Texas but for other teams.

I’m not sure what one would consider a meaningful snap of football. If you like share a little more insight into the meaningful snaps you’ve played. Does that start at the college level?

Stats/data all need to be taken in context. In 2021 is when I became particularly intrigued with PFF. I do feel as though I’ve gained some knowledge each year. And often as I see one data point, it brings about a different question for me. I never take one data point in isolation. For average time to throw, the overall time has less value than the categorization of it. For all of 2025, the QB with longest time to throw for the entire season was 2.86 seconds when kept clean. Faizon’s was 3.27 seconds when kept clean. His average depth of target on those throws was 7.8 yards. Of 168 qualifying QBs, that ranks 101st in deepest down the field when kept clean. Arch was 2.48 seconds and 8.6 yards down the field. So about 8 tenths of a second faster at almost a yard further downfield. Faizon was not good. These numbers indicate that Faizon is not being decisive with the ball or that he’s waiting to attack downfield. He held it too long for too little reward. For 2025, the worst rate of pressures converted to sacks was 36%. He was at 43%. If you’d like to add a little context to that Arch was at 13.3% last year. So not sure how you to spin that to say Faizon was not responsible for his share of the blame. So rather than complaining about the information I made a concerted effort to understand it better. I’d encourage others to do the same.

Why not? They have lots of information. It is broken down multiple ways. Even as a user of the information, you can disregard whatever piece you find not useful. That average time to throw can be broken down multiple ways. Did you know that? Because often as it’s presented is in the context of every pass. But it is available when “kept clean” as a standalone so inherent in that is how long a QB sits in the pocket. So now imagine when collecting that data point only on non-scrambles or just collect it every time then sort it out. Probably easier to collect every play - snap to throw equals no ambiguity. And the thing is that every game is collected consistently. So I ask you now, did you know it can be broken down separately?

So they should cut it off before he throws it? So you’d call it “average time to………not throw just yet.?”

Remember when Arch rolled left versus UTEP, then rolled right then threw the pick? That was probably 7 seconds or more from snap to release. Thats what would get thrown in that bucket. It’s not indicative of when pressure happened but actual time from snap to release however that occurs.

Several sacks were because Faizon left the pocket and ran into Simmons who wasn’t really rushing but playing contain. That’s on the QB not the Oline. Believe the RBs were graded as atrocious in the pass pro too - actually it was only Bishop. Sanders grade now sits at 72.1. Moe only played 2 pass plays. Perry played 58 and was graded at 47.2 yet not listed here. The average time to throw is likely solid. It does not mean you cannot or need not apply context. When “kept clean” that time is 3.27 seconds. That’s more time than most take throughout a game when including pressured. When “under pressured” it was 4.37, also a high number but not as high relatively speaking. Almost 100% of the time, the under pressure rate results in a higher average time to throw than the kept clean time, at least in my observations.

Coleman has gotten bullied a bit. Some of the throws his way seem a bit forced. He and Arch have had less time together than Wingo and Mosley too so that may have some impact too.

I think we’ll be ready but Sark also beaten the better OU teams he’s faced.

We seem to get a bit more Trent Richardson plays than I’d like. That may get ignored because we’re fast.

Sark was on record saying that they’d worked on that specifically so I’m not certain that was particular freedom given to the QB. Also compare that to ASU having 13 games of tape with which to work versus Tennessee and a new DC with only 3 games. And likely none of those 3 provided exactly the insight we needed. So who knows how much leash is given.

That could be. I don’t delve into that component too much regarding scheme and what he’s asked to do. My opinion comes from straight pass sets that he doesn’t have much impact. They bumped him inside some without much impact. I’ve looked at it as he’s a young, inexperienced guy that we don’t know who he is just yet. Just looked up his alignments. Last year he was outside the Tackle 75% of the time, this year around 56%. Last year Bgap was around 14%, this year 10%. He’s spent more time over the Tackle this year.