Hookem72 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago @Bobby Burton @Gerry Hamilton Last cycle we were pretty in on these guys and I wonder if it ever came out how much more Tech paid than our offer to get these guys? I think few people recognized Bailey could be a stud, but we were after him pretty hard. I feel like Lee Hunter would have also been a great hit for us. Quote
mgm32 Posted 35 minutes ago Posted 35 minutes ago It's a lot easier to offer up spots for one year mercenaries when they don't have any competition on the roster and can walk into starting gigs. Tech didn't have to do much, if any, retention last year and still significantly less than Texas this year. Stark difference in the programs and how they have to approach the portal. 2 Quote
Hookem72 Posted 29 minutes ago Author Posted 29 minutes ago Well. It certainly worked out for Tech and Bailey and Hunter in this case. Quote
hookem1014 Posted 29 minutes ago Posted 29 minutes ago 4 minutes ago, mgm32 said: It's a lot easier to offer up spots for one year mercenaries when they don't have any competition on the roster and can walk into starting gigs. Tech didn't have to do much, if any, retention last year and still significantly less than Texas this year. Stark difference in the programs and how they have to approach the portal. We still have quite of bit of retention to do but I’m hoping the attrition helps free up space for multiple big hitters in the portal Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.