Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Moderators
Posted
Just now, Hornsfan01 said:

@CJ Vogel @Gerry Hamilton our biggest needs are LB and OL correct? Sprinkle in a downfield wr and maybe another bruiser at RB, maybe another edge? I understand we have wiffed alot but it’s still early and have basically now and summer portal window to address the problems? I feel like we are in a decent spot? I’m sure both of u have elaborated on that already.  

Well, there is no summer portal window this year.

This is the only chance essentially to get it right. Texas still needs another RB imo. Two linebackers and 2-3 offensive linemen. On top of a pass catcher. Lots of work to go.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
1 minute ago, CJ Vogel said:

Well, there is no summer portal window this year.

This is the only chance essentially to get it right. Texas still needs another RB imo. Two linebackers and 2-3 offensive linemen. On top of a pass catcher. Lots of work to go.

Oh I see now. I understand how big the whiffs are now. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, CJ Vogel said:

Well, there is no summer portal window this year.

This is the only chance essentially to get it right. Texas still needs another RB imo. Two linebackers and 2-3 offensive linemen. On top of a pass catcher. Lots of work to go.

You mentioned on live last night potentially adding a sledgehammer between the tackles back or it may have been @Jeff Howe. Are we talking like 6’+ and 210+ or just running style?

Edited by 94puddin94
  • Moderators
Posted
3 minutes ago, 94puddin94 said:

You mentioned on live last night potentially adding a sledgehammer between the tackles back or it may have been @Jeff Howe. Are we talking like 6’+ and 210+ or just running style?

Personally, I would like to see 215, because for the time being, I have no reason to believe the offensive line will be able to generate the push necessary on short distances. If that's going to be the case, I would like to know the RB can fall forward off of size alone and do the dirty work himself.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, CJ Vogel said:

Personally, I would like to see 215, because for the time being, I have no reason to believe the offensive line will be able to generate the push necessary on short distances. If that's going to be the case, I would like to know the RB can fall forward off of size alone and do the dirty work himself.

There’s an intriguing RB out of Kentucky with a big frame Donte Dowdell that catches my eye. But looking into it he’s transferred twice in 2 years.

Posted
34 minutes ago, MBHORNSFAN said:

 

Players signed from the Portal as of last night..

 

Ohio State 1.... Now 2

Georgia 1

Oregon 1

Notre Dame o

BYU 0

Miami 0

 

I guess all these teams the process is broken too.... 

 

Long way to go. Let’s see how it finishes before we meltdown.... And honestly if it goes bad Sark won't make it here. It really is that simple. I am win or GTFO fan.......No need is losing our minds every second.. 

I don’t like this laid-back attitude, to be honest Texas had a head start with NIL and the first few years of the portal we could get who we wanted. Now plenty of other teams have caught up and we let 4 seasons of 2 5 star quarterbacks with elite defenses pass us by. 

Posted

One thought to throw out there. Texas has not lost a big game target because the money was not right. In most cases, they left money on the table and returned to their schools. That money is still in our pocket and available for plan B. It is gonna be alright folks. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Moderators
Posted
1 minute ago, Hookem 78 said:

One thought to throw out there. Texas has not lost a big game target because the money was not right. In most cases, they left money on the table and returned to their schools. That money is still in our pocket and available for plan B. It is gonna be alright folks. 

In a way, that's also very concerning.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 5
  • Sad 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, CJ Vogel said:

Well, there is no summer portal window this year.

This is the only chance essentially to get it right. Texas still needs another RB imo. Two linebackers and 2-3 offensive linemen. On top of a pass catcher. Lots of work to go.

I realize a very select % are grad transfers, but can they still transfer in spring?

Posted
2 minutes ago, Assistant Regional Manager said:

What is the experimental change they implemented?

Seems like we are less focused on retention, we might intentionally carry fewer scholarship players to have more money to fund the 2-3 deep directly.  Less money on developmental guys than in the past.  Which probably means bigger portal needs going forward.

It seems like a step towards the Indiana/Ole Miss philosophy or an NFL philosophy.

Since most of us think we were just 3-4 players away last year (RB, 2OL, and maybe a true no.1 WR), this is a relatively aggressive strategy of change more than a tweak.

The guys have been saying all-in and this change does seem aggressive not cautious.  And it's on top of letting PK go.

Can't say it's bad or good yet IMO.

Posted
2 minutes ago, NoDakHornsFan said:

I realize a very select % are grad transfers, but can they still transfer in spring?

yeah grad transfers can go then. just a wild ass guess but that's when I expect an experienced depth QB to be added tbh

Posted
6 minutes ago, Hookem 78 said:

One thought to throw out there. Texas has not lost a big game target because the money was not right. In most cases, they left money on the table and returned to their schools. That money is still in our pocket and available for plan B. It is gonna be alright folks. 

That's even more concerning. They don't want to come here so badly that some are turning down significantly bigger offers?

  • Moderators
Posted
2 hours ago, Joe Zura said:

I’m going to try a new tactic today. I’m just glad to be part of such a great community and I love everyone here and the most important thing 🤘🏼🤘🏼🤘🏼🤘🏼🤘🏼🤘🏼

giphy(21).gif.fc7ddcff5b9e67a1987d0d682aea4b89.gif

  • Haha 6
Posted
4 minutes ago, CJ Vogel said:

In a way, that's also very concerning.

I 100% agree with this. If we can’t convince guys to want to play for Texas without significantly overpaying them, then it’s clear we don’t have good recruiters on staff.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, William Gillean said:

Seems like we are less focused on retention, we might intentionally carry fewer scholarship players to have more money to fund the 2-3 deep directly.  Less money on developmental guys than in the past.  Which probably means bigger portal needs going forward.

It seems like a step towards the Indiana/Ole Miss philosophy or an NFL philosophy.

Since most of us think we were just 3-4 players away last year (RB, 2OL, and maybe a true no.1 WR), this is a relatively aggressive strategy of change more than a tweak.

The guys have been saying all-in and this change does seem aggressive not cautious.  And it's on top of letting PK go.

Can't say it's bad or good yet IMO.

What they are doing isn't any different than most programs.

Look at the numbers teams like LSU, Georgia, Bama are bringing in from the portal. They won't be fully utilizing the 105 scholarships either. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.