Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
51 minutes ago, mmdaytontexas said:

Nonsense. The tape doesn't lie. There are open receivers and open running lanes and Arch is freezing like a scare-goat. He's broken. Can he fix it tomorrow night? Certainly. Do we expect him to? We are hopeful, but not confident. But to say this dysfunction is on Sark, the play caller, is ridiculous. 

Have you considered even if there are open receivers it's not the offense arch is apt to run and make decisions in?  Come on now

Posted
6 hours ago, Gerry Hamilton said:

Not about the team .. but Mario has not been high on Arch behind the scenes ever 

247 Sports indicates Miami offered Arch - seems like somebody at the U was interested?

ScreenShot2026-10-23at9_43_42PM.thumb.png.fbab041cfeb58baf22ec3f3533f0743f.png

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Hookem72 said:

This kind of clickbait bs is what is wrong with sports media. It has a quote next to pictures of Arch that insinuate Arch is the person being quoted and says in smaller print that it is actually attributed to Ran Carthon.  Who the hell is Ran Carthon?  A lot of people will read this and feed the other rumors.  

All true but did you see who liked it?

Posted (edited)

“Develop” lol. Are these people braindead?

Does developing QBs mean picking the number 1 QB transfer each year?

Cam- transfer for 1 year 

Beck- transfer for 1 year

Mensah- transfer for 1 year 

NTM they play dogsh&t opponents and rack their stats up. 

Who is the last QB they actually developed over more than one season? 

Edited by TheRoJoShow
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Moderators
Posted
1 minute ago, TheRoJoShow said:

“Develop” lol. Are these people braindead?

Cam- transfer for 1 year 

Beck- transfer for 1 year

Mensah- transfer for 1 year 

NTM they play dogsh&t opponents and rack their stats up. 
 

Who is the last QB they actually developed?

Yes they are. They have maximized Mensah … but developed haha 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Moderators
Posted

I want to be clear on something, I'm a fan of Arch Manning. Have defended him as the only HS athlete I ever seen built up and torn down.

I hope he goes out Saturday are flips the script on his season, but I'm going to be real on how bad I think its been this year.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Gerry Hamilton said:

I want to be clear on something, I'm a fan of Arch Manning. Have defended him as the only HS athlete I ever seen built up and torn down.

I hope he goes out Saturday are flips the script on his season, but I'm going to be real on how bad I think its been this year.  

#number1archhater

  • Haha 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Gerry Hamilton said:

Mario Cristobal is NOT interested 

He's not high on Arch at all 

Yea Arch is very different than the last 3 QBs they've had. I could see him at Indiana. It's a run first offense where the QB is more a manager and only has to make a limited amount of  crucial plays. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Gerry Hamilton said:

Arch and the system/Sark are two different convos. 
 

Arch, specifically, is playing the QB position at a woefully bad level despite having three NFL level WR’s around him. He’s making head scratching QB plays that are 7th grade level, and he’s not processing and he’s also been bad in the pocket this year. Throwing the ball beyond the LOS 2 times in a game - never seen that before on any level of football.  Doing that in back to back games - never seen that before. His melt down is among the worst I’ve ever seen. 
 

That’s not putting all the offensive woes on him, but a lot of it is.


 Without quality QB play, an offense has zero shot. IMO, he’s leaving 125’ish yards on the field every game and 10-14 points .

Never seen a fourth year QB not be able to be trusted to check in and out of bad plays, and have command of the offense before. 

Sark himself said he doesn’t have the QB check in and out of plays. It’s run my play 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.