Bevo92 Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago (edited) https://apple.news/A2oQpQQiVSBeEJRZPD6l3ww The pressure is on Joey McGuire to deliver results finally. No excuses with the amount the Red Raiders have invested. They should be clear favorite in Big12. Odd they didn’t upgrade QB as Gerry and Bobby have noted. Edited 23 hours ago by Bevo92 3 Quote
CHorn427 Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago Rumor has it Tech is spending their full $20.5 million allotment from the House settlement on Micah Hudson’s chauffeur service 7 Quote
Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted 13 hours ago Moderators Posted 13 hours ago Not sure I buy that one 1 Quote
Bobby Burton Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago I think they’re all in across almost every sport. We’ll see how it all works out for them. Not quite enough in softball. 3 3 Quote
Glass Joe Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago This is where the new “legitimate” NIL will have its focus and impact. Paying the $20.5M in revenue sharing per the House settlement is pretty straightforward for all schools. In the case of Tech, the other $34M is largely just pay-for-play under the guise of bogus NIL deals. I’m confident in saying there aren’t businesses in Lubbock (or the entire West Texas region) willing to spend $34m annually to have Tech athletes sponsor / represent their products…which is the definition of legitimate NIL. If we assume the $55M figure is accurate, it means that the $34M is largely just a big donor or two paying athletes to play for Tech. That is pay-for-play (not NIL). It doesn’t take too much of a leap to guess the rubber will meet the road when the newly created CSC (College Sports Committee) assesses the legitimacy of these $34m deals…and the Tech boosters will be required to defend the deals. A wild guess here is you’ll see lawsuits from Tech challenging the ability of the CSC to disallow payments to their athletes based “pay for play” standard as opposed to “name/image/likeness” standard. 1 Quote
Bevo92 Posted 12 hours ago Author Posted 12 hours ago 14 minutes ago, Glass Joe said: This is where the new “legitimate” NIL will have its focus and impact. Paying the $20.5M in revenue sharing per the House settlement is pretty straightforward for all schools. In the case of Tech, the other $34M is largely just pay-for-play under the guise of bogus NIL deals. I’m confident in saying there aren’t businesses in Lubbock (or the entire West Texas region) willing to spend $34m annually to have Tech athletes sponsor / represent their products…which is the definition of legitimate NIL. If we assume the $55M figure is accurate, it means that the $34M is largely just a big donor or two paying athletes to play for Tech. That is pay-for-play (not NIL). It doesn’t take too much of a leap to guess the rubber will meet the road when the newly created CSC (College Sports Committee) assesses the legitimacy of these $34m deals…and the Tech boosters will be required to defend the deals. A wild guess here is you’ll see lawsuits from Tech challenging the ability of the CSC to disallow payments to their athletes based “pay for play” standard as opposed to “name/image/likeness” standard. Agree. Will be interesting to see how Tech performs in 2025/2026 across all sports, but especially football, given their supposed #1 class from the transfer portal. For all of Joey McGuire’s big talk over the past several years about championships running through west Texas, he’s yet to do anything on the field where it matters/. In softball, their strategy almost worked till it imploded in the first inning of game 3 and ran out of gas. 2 Quote
NotGerryHamilton Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 3 hours ago, Bobby Burton said: I think they’re all in across almost every sport. We’ll see how it all works out for them. Not quite enough in softball. Spending all that money to for no titles. Yikes 2 Quote
Bunk Moreland Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago All that just to fail to make the Big 12 championship game. Sad! 1 Quote
Bevo92 Posted 6 hours ago Author Posted 6 hours ago Even the Texas Tech beat writers are laughing at $55m being spent on college athletics out in Lubbock, not much to show for it. Lol. 😂 1 Quote
Hashtag Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago They're trying to portray themselves as a NIL powerhouse because they have nothing else to sale. 1 Quote
Bevo92 Posted 5 hours ago Author Posted 5 hours ago (edited) 4 minutes ago, Hashtag said: They're trying to portray themselves as a NIL powerhouse because they have nothing else to sale. Agree that it's the only thing they can brag about, it seems. Says alot about their coaches and culture if they spend all this money and don't have any championships to show for it. Will be interesting to see where the chips all fall by end of this next year. Bottom line, this seems very short-sighted as they can't continue at this pace of spending it would seem, given the end of 'pay for play' through the collectives should theoretically end with new oversight being put in place by Deloitte and commissioners office. Edited 5 hours ago by Bevo92 1 Quote
CHorn427 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago After ensuring Micah Hudson is the highest paid WR in CFB, Tech’s next priority is to use the rest of their money to construct a state of the art Potemkin Village to convince recruits they actually won’t be spending any of their life in Lubbock, Texas. 1 Quote
Tuco Ramirez Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 41 minutes ago, CHorn427 said: After ensuring Micah Hudson is the highest paid WR in CFB, Tech’s next priority is to use the rest of their money to construct a state of the art Potemkin Village to convince recruits they actually won’t be spending any of their life in Lubbock, Texas. Either that or tear down all the roads leading out of town so no oos athletes can escape. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.