OsasTheDestroyer Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago https://x.com/profootballtalk/status/1945823550763303340?s=46&t=RxFJXnvQWbX7tkt6p4pbzw Quote
Tuco Ramirez Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago It’ll be interesting to see what is in this EO considering the US Supreme Court already ruled on NIL. Quote
Bobby Burton Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago We can talk about the EO/NIL. Leave politics and the politicians out of it. 5 Quote
John F. Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago As if there weren’t enough moving parts with the house settlement, portal windows, NLI changes, realignment, and so on… Got to be challenging to navigate Quote
FootLaw Posted 50 minutes ago Posted 50 minutes ago EOs aren't "law" per se. Since SCOTUS has already broadly ruled on this issue, the EO is fighting upstream. I don't see this moving the needle much. I do see a lawsuit for a clearinghouse denial coming soon. 2 Quote
Bobby Burton Posted 36 minutes ago Posted 36 minutes ago The person I read the most on these topics is Ross Dellenger of Yahoo. He is absolutely dialed in. He seems to think that an EO will do nothing more than establish the CSC. After that, it’s not much meat. 1 Quote
marathon Posted 34 minutes ago Posted 34 minutes ago 2 hours ago, Bobby Burton said: We can talk about the EO/NIL. Leave politics and the politicians out of it. Don’t disagree but when politicians (whichever party) inject themselves into the middle of our sport it makes it more difficult. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.