Offensive Coaching Staff

[LonghornFan4Ever]

1 minute ago, Oldest Horn said:

Funny, three years ago everyone was calling for PK’s head on a platter. Memories can get really selective. 

PK’s defenses have improved every year since he’s been here and went from god awful, to really good, to elite once Nansen joined his staff and tied the front to the back.

As crazy as it sounds, Sark’s best offense at Texas was his first season with a healthy Casey Thompson, Worthy, Bijan, and Roschon.  Made good throws in the short and intermediate game along with a great deep ball.  Red zone was really good too.

[Oldest Horn]

4 minutes ago, LonghornFan4Ever said:

PK’s defenses have improved every year since he’s been here and went from god awful, to really good, to elite once Nansen joined his staff and tied the front to the back.

As crazy as it sounds, Sark’s best offense at Texas was his first season with a healthy Casey Thompson, Worthy, Bijan, and Roschon.  Made good throws in the short and intermediate game along with a great deep ball.  Red zone was really good too.

Sorry but playoff berths count for more than a big showing against Tech and a one great half (sadly, the first) against OU in 2021. You can’t judge an offense on a game and a half, one of which was a sorry team. 

[Hashtag]

13 minutes ago, Oldest Horn said:

Sorry but playoff berths count for more than a big showing against Tech and a one great half (sadly, the first) against OU in 2021. You can’t judge an offense on a game and a half, one of which was a sorry team. 

So you're just happy to be there and okay with not being able to win it all because of offensive deficiency? 

[Oldest Horn]

Just now, Hashtag said:

So you're just happy to be there and okay with not being able to win it all because of offensive deficiency? 

I know we won’t win it every year and I’m happy be back in contention consistently. If we stay the course I think we’ll snag a title or two over the next five years. 
 

But you think our staff are idiots and you can find a better way. 
 

Then again you can’t distinguish our starters from backups in real time. Do you have a hi-def TV? Maybe watch the game from your couch with binoculars in the future. 
 

[Hashtag]

Just now, Oldest Horn said:

I know we won’t win it every year and I’m happy be back in contention consistently. If we stay the course I think we’ll snag a title or two over the next five years. 
 

But you think our staff are idiots and you can find a better way. 
 

Then again you can’t distinguish our starters from backups in real time. Do you have a hi-def TV? Maybe watch the game from your couch with binoculars in the future. 
 

I'm just going by numbers man....is what it is. Odds say a play calling head coach isn't going to win a title especially an offensive one because in the last 30 years Steve Spurrier and Jimbo Fisher are the only two to do it. I'd rather Sarkisian swallow his pride and hire a new QB coach with play calling duties. If he can't do that and realize his side of the ball is the weak link and reason why we haven't and won't punch through then that's on him.

[JMarquette]

Just now, Hashtag said:

I'm just going by numbers man....is what it is. Odds say a play calling head coach isn't going to win a title especially an offensive one because in the last 30 years Steve Spurrier and Jimbo Fisher are the only two to do it. I'd rather Sarkisian swallow his pride and hire a new QB coach with play calling duties. If he can't do that and realize his side of the ball is the weak link and reason why we haven't and won't punch through then that's on him.

I think this is a more than fair point - the moment Day gave up play calling, they won. 

[Oldest Horn]

2 minutes ago, Hashtag said:

I'm just going by numbers man....is what it is. Odds say a play calling head coach isn't going to win a title especially an offensive one because in the last 30 years Steve Spurrier and Jimbo Fisher are the only two to do it. I'd rather Sarkisian swallow his pride and hire a new QB coach with play calling duties. If he can't do that and realize his side of the ball is the weak link and reason why we haven't and won't punch through then that's on him.

38-7. There’s a couple for you. 

[JMarquette]

3 minutes ago, Oldest Horn said:

38-7. There’s a couple for you. 

Yes because beating FCS teams has been our problem

[Oldest Horn]

1 minute ago, JMarquette said:

Yes because beating FCS teams has been our problem

San Jose St isn’t FCS. You’re welcome. 

[JMarquette]

1 minute ago, Oldest Horn said:

San Jose St isn’t FCS. You’re welcome. 

Honestly, if you just like put 2 seconds into thinking about how beating SJSU 38-7 helps your point, I think you really need to reevaluate how you watch football. 

[Hashtag]

10 minutes ago, Oldest Horn said:

38-7. There’s a couple for you. 

2-28 since 1995 HC's who have won national titles as offensive playcallers and those who were not play callers for their team in national championships the last 30 years

2-8 vs top 10 teams as Texas

1-6 vs top 5 teams at Texas with his offense being the problem in most all of these top 5 games.

111('24), 89('23) red zone rankings on semi final teams that lost because offense can't score in red zone 

Year: Offense vs Defensive Rankings
2024: 18 vs 3
2023: 19 vs 6
2022: 17 vs 8
2021: 35 vs 47

The numbers clearly show the problem and it needs correcting. 

 

With that said, I am happy you're just glad to be in the playoffs!

 

Edited 5 hours ago by Hashtag

[Oldest Horn]

2 minutes ago, Hashtag said:

2-28 since 1995 HC's who have won national titles as offensive playcallers and those who were not play callers for their team in national championships the last 30 years

2-8 vs top 10 teams as Texas

1-6 vs top 5 teams at Texas with his offense being the problem in most all of these top 5 games.

111('24), 89('23) red zone rankings on semi final teams that lost because offense can't score in red zone 

Year: Offense vs Defensive Rankings
2024: 18 vs 3
2023: 19 vs 6
2022: 17 vs 8
2021: 35 vs 47

The numbers clearly show the problem and it needs correcting.

 

Somebody get this to CDC!

[Hashtag]

Just now, Oldest Horn said:

Somebody get this to CDC!

And you expect our QB coach to be able to help our HC how to call offense when this is his offenses as a OC:

Akron Offensive FEI

2013 - 113

2014 - 122

2015 - 99 

2016 - 90

2017 - 114

2018 - 126

[Oldest Horn]

6 minutes ago, JMarquette said:

Honestly, if you just like put 2 seconds into thinking about how beating SJSU 38-7 helps your point, I think you really need to reevaluate how you watch football. 

Incredible advice from someone who doesn’t know what subdivision our opponents are in. 
 

But I’ll perform a serious reevaluation nevertheless! I’ll PM you daily with my progress. 

[Hashtag]

I find it comical that Sark is so hard headed being a Saban reclamation project that he can't see this. Considering Saban ALWAYS adapted to the changes in CFB especially with regards to offense.

[Oldest Horn]

1 minute ago, Hashtag said:

And you expect our QB coach to be able to help our HC how to call offense when this is his offenses as a OC:

Akron Offensive FEI

2013 - 113

2014 - 122

2015 - 99 

2016 - 90

2017 - 114

2018 - 126

I am blown away. BTW, congrats on winning the Kimberly-Clark scholar award yesterday. 

[Oldest Horn]

Just now, Hashtag said:

I find it comical that Sark is so hard headed being a Saban reclamation project that he can't see this. Considering Saban ALWAYS adapted to the changes in CFB especially with regards to offense.

Good. I’m glad you’re amused. 

[ThatHornsGuy87]

2 hours ago, AceHorn23 said:

Tom, is this you?

Beat me to it 🤣🤣

[UTexas]

1 hour ago, JMarquette said:

Honestly, if you just like put 2 seconds into thinking about how beating SJSU 38-7 helps your point, I think you really need to reevaluate how you watch football. 

He’s not wrong. You are and now you can’t  handle the truth. That’s a you issue. 

[JMarquette]

12 minutes ago, UTexas said:

He’s not wrong. You are and now you can’t  handle the truth. That’s a you issue. 

How am I wrong? We looked fine for like 10 minutes and then pedestrian for the rest. The fact you can’t make an objective look and say that this offense is not good is insane. 

[JMarquette]

1 hour ago, Oldest Horn said:

Incredible advice from someone who doesn’t know what subdivision our opponents are in. 
 

But I’ll perform a serious reevaluation nevertheless! I’ll PM you daily with my progress. 

They lost to central Michigan and let up 200+ rushing yards to central Michigan. I know you think you’re helping yourself, but you’re not. 

[Oldest Horn]

2 minutes ago, JMarquette said:

They lost to central Michigan and let up 200+ rushing yards to central Michigan. I know you think you’re helping yourself, but you’re not. 

I’m not? I’m so crushed! 
 

Please, please, please keep course correcting me. I thrive on it!

[Hashtag]

[Hookem72]

As much as I love Sark, everytime I hear the commentators talk about a 40 play script, I pour a drink and prepare myself for disappointment.   I started to lose faith in it in the Washington playoff loss after there was no change until halftime in the tipped Quinn balls over the middle.

After two games against Georgia and OSU, the script has to go in big games.   Be a playcaller,  not a screenwriter.  Just my ordinary joe opinion.

Edited 4 hours ago by Hookem72
Cleaning up grammar and typos on iphone

[UTexas]

36 minutes ago, JMarquette said:

How am I wrong? We looked fine for like 10 minutes and then pedestrian for the rest. The fact you can’t make an objective look and say that this offense is not good is insane. 

You’re wrong in that you referred to SJSU as an FCS school, Oldest corrected you and then you turned around with excuses. Pretty simple I thought.