GoneFission Posted October 25 Posted October 25 Is it too early to start speculation with things like why did Sark miss a few weeks after the playoff fame in January and had the "flu" for junior day? Quote
Jbro52 Posted October 25 Posted October 25 2 minutes ago, GoneFission said: Is it too early to start speculation with things like why did Sark miss a few weeks after the playoff fame in January and had the "flu" for junior day? His son was born 3 Quote
LILP Posted October 25 Posted October 25 1 minute ago, Jbro52 said: His son was born This could be the reason for the change. We will be in great hands next season with Sark, Freeman or Kiffin. Not worried at all! Quote
connorkp23 Posted October 25 Posted October 25 How has Sark been "more checked out" and "less committed" this year? Because we aren't playing well? That's a bunch of BS. I don't know how you can be "checked out" as a college coach working 18 hour days, traveling across the country to recruit on bye weeks, etc. I don't know the extent of the truth to the rumor but it's very evident people are getting too wound up about what was initially posted at the bottom of a long article in the Athletic. 3 Quote
UTexas Posted October 25 Posted October 25 The conspiracy fans are out in full force today. Many have very few posts. Nothing to see here folks. Kickoff is in 20 minutes. Quote
SchoolColors Posted October 25 Posted October 25 11 minutes ago, connorkp23 said: How has Sark been "more checked out" and "less committed" this year? Because we aren't playing well? That's a bunch of BS. I don't know how you can be "checked out" as a college coach working 18 hour days, traveling across the country to recruit on bye weeks, etc. I don't know the extent of the truth to the rumor but it's very evident people are getting too wound up about what was initially posted at the bottom of a long article in the Athletic. <insert “flu” cover story from back in January when he missed the junior day> Quote
SchoolColors Posted October 25 Posted October 25 (edited) 37 minutes ago, Jbro52 said: “His” son was born They announced his arrival near April. Edited October 25 by SchoolColors 1 Quote
Red Five Posted October 25 Posted October 25 16 minutes ago, UTexas said: Nothing to see here folks. Right. Sure. 1 1 Quote
LILP Posted October 25 Posted October 25 5 minutes ago, Hornsfan01 said: This the offense the nfl wants? This is not only a bad offense. He’s calling really bad place mind you we all are watching from our living rooms or some from the stands but it’s abysmal and the sheer fact that number 79 is in the rotation holy cow… If KyleFlood has a job tomorrow shame on Sark. Quote
whereiend Posted October 25 Posted October 25 Any hope that these rumours could be true and offensive genius Sark will be off our hands for zero buyout? Quote
Bunk Moreland Posted October 25 Posted October 25 If we’re being real, Sark is probably coming to the realization that he can’t be the coach he wants to be in college and win at the highest level. He’s always said he’s “obsessed” with the job, but the lack of attention to this roster in the offseason suggests a strong whiff of complacency. I think he’s probably realizing that he’s taken this program as far as he can. And if we’re being real, he probably has. I’m grateful for Sark—he brought this program back to near greatness. But we might need fresh blood to get to the promise land. Marcus Freeman is definitely the answer if we can get him. 1 1 Quote
SchoolColors Posted October 25 Posted October 25 https://www.top10.com/moving-companies/longdistance-comparison Quote
Okcool Posted October 25 Posted October 25 F'n wingo turn back to the football and high point it in the air. Damn guy. try a little 1 Quote
Hornsfan01 Posted October 26 Posted October 26 1 hour ago, Hornsfan01 said: This the worst offense in power 4? Well this aged well. And I won’t lie I’m happy it did.😂😭 2 1 Quote
SchoolColors Posted October 26 Posted October 26 No denial and he attacks the messenger? Not a good look imo. Seems like he maybe upset within his circle as well. 3 Quote
Forrest J. Posted October 27 Posted October 27 On 10/25/2025 at 9:53 AM, Gerry Hamilton said: Absolutely @Gerry Hamilton you are really high on Freeman. Can you tell us why you think he’s so good and why it hasn’t resulted in a title at Notre Dame? Like Sark, he seems to be a good, but not great head coach. I don’t see more than that in him. What am I missing? Quote
Forrest J. Posted October 27 Posted October 27 I’ve said it for a while now, Sark has topped out as a college program builder. He can take you from bad to good and even really good. But taking you from really good to great takes a special kind of coach, the kind that I don’t believe Sark is. Quote
Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted October 27 Author Moderators Posted October 27 1 hour ago, Forrest J. said: @Gerry Hamilton you are really high on Freeman. Can you tell us why you think he’s so good and why it hasn’t resulted in a title at Notre Dame? Like Sark, he seems to be a good, but not great head coach. I don’t see more than that in him. What am I missing? I would say first, it's very difficult to win a NC. And now in a real playoff its going to be harder than ever. So he got the Notre Dame head coaching job at 36 years old, and in three years had ND in the National Title game with zero previous head coaching experience. And he did it with tremendous coaching, and knowing who to hire. His teams play the right way for me. He's proving to be a very good evaluator and developer in his first college gig, and one with a lot of pressure. He's light years better as a HC early in his career vs. Sark IMO. Like not even close. I really believe he's built so well for current CFB and as a leader of a program for the next 9-10 years. Does that guarantee and NC? Not in todays day and age of headed to 16 team playoff and eventually probably 20-24 teams playoff years from now. 3 Quote
harveycmd Posted October 27 Posted October 27 15 minutes ago, Gerry Hamilton said: I would say first, it's very difficult to win a NC. And now in a real playoff its going to be harder than ever. So he got the Notre Dame head coaching job at 36 years old, and in three years had ND in the National Title game with zero previous head coaching experience. And he did it with tremendous coaching, and knowing who to hire. His teams play the right way for me. He's proving to be a very good evaluator and developer in his first college gig, and one with a lot of pressure. He's light years better as a HC early in his career vs. Sark IMO. Like not even close. I really believe he's built so well for current CFB and as a leader of a program for the next 9-10 years. Does that guarantee and NC? Not in todays day and age of headed to 16 team playoff and eventually probably 20-24 teams playoff years from now. ND and and Freeman ain't nothing. This is crazy. Sark was scheming and winning titles when he was 30. Freeman never done nothing but wear tight shirts. Quote
Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted October 27 Author Moderators Posted October 27 2 minutes ago, harveycmd said: ND and and Freeman ain't nothing. This is crazy. Sark was scheming and winning titles when he was 30. Freeman never done nothing but wear tight shirts. As a head coach! Specifically as a head coach is what I said. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.