Skip to content

Three things to consider regarding Laurence Seymore and Texas' left guard competition

College football’s talking season is rife with hyperbole.

Thankfully, Steve Sarkisian shelved coachspeak last month after praising Laurence Seymore for the strides he’s made since joining the Texas program in June. It painted the most realistic picture of what to expect from Seymore when the Longhorns hold their first preseason practice on Wednesday.

“It’s difficult in the summertime. We’re in underwear,” Sarkisian said during his press conference at the Texas High School Coaches Association Convention in Houston. “We'll find out a lot in training camp, especially when we get into the second week, when we're really in full pads and we're getting going. But so far, so good with him.”

If Seymore, a 2025 second-team All-American with 27 career games played and 21 starts over parts of four seasons at Miami, Akron and Western Kentucky, wins the starting job at left guard, he’ll fill the biggest need Texas had on either side of the ball coming out of spring practice.

But Seymore must win the job. It won’t be given to him.

Seymore has to prove to Sarkisian and Kyle Flood that he’s the best option to protect Arch Manning and elevate the running game over Jaydon Chatman, Jackson Christian, Dylan Sikorski and any other challengers Seymore might face in camp.

Before the 6-foot-2-inch, 316-pound Seymore hits the field for the first time in a formal practice with the Longhorns, there are three things to consider regarding the left guard competition:

— Seymore’s presence as a pass blocker could be the most significant upgrade any of the transfer portal additions on offense will bring to the table in 2026.

Seymore’s Pro Football Focus pass-blocking grade of 82.6 ranked 30th among FBS guards with at least 100 pass-blocking snaps last season (eight pressures allowed on 503 opportunities). While he dominated the competition in Conference USA, Seymore also allowed just one pressure on 48 opportunities against LSU and was charged with only one penalty on 840 snaps for the season.

Those are important numbers against the backdrop of what Texas got out of the left guard position in 2025.

According to PFF, the left guard position was responsible for 26.5 percent of the dropbacks on which Manning was pressured. That was the highest percentage of any position on the Texas offensive line and the highest percentage for any FBS offensive line’s left guard spot among the 136 quarterbacks in the country who were pressured on at least 50 dropbacks.

— One of the legitimate questions regarding Seymore’s potential impact is how he’ll operate within Sarkisian’s zone running game.

PFF’s run-blocking grades rated DJ Campbell (73.6) and Cole Hutson (71.6) as better overall run blockers than Seymore (63.9; PFF considers a grade of 70 above average). Of Seymore’s 308 gradable run-blocking snaps, 62.7 percent of them were on gap schemes; on zone runs, Campbell (81.2) and Hutson (74.5) graded out significantly higher than Seymore (60.2).

Seymore should help the Longhorns improve as a gap/power running team. Still, Seymore must be well-rounded enough to keep opponents from successfully attacking a vulnerable part of the line.

— Whether Hutson rejoins the team or not, Chatman, Christian, Sikorski and the other contenders for playing time at left guard have an advantage over Seymore with their varying levels of experience in Sarkisian’s offense.

How fast Seymore absorbs the offense and takes to the field could be the biggest factor in how long the competition lasts. If Seymore needs time to get things down, Sarkisian and Flood could look at other options, some of which could significantly alter the projected depth chart as camp progresses.

Andre Cojoe, Jonte Newman or John Turntine III emerging as a viable third tackle option behind Trevor Goosby and Melvin Siani could lead to Jordan Coleman, who spent the spring at left tackle while Goosby was recovering from shoulder surgery, getting a look at guard.

Not only would Seymore winning the left guard job put the starting five for the Sept. 5 season opener against Texas State in stone, but it would also let Sarkisian and Flood get their depth pieces in order. Maximizing the available depth by turning to the best possible combination in a pinch is pivotal to the offense maintaining consistency and potency during a potential 17-game season, to say the least.

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

HonkEm

Supporters

Wednesday can't get here quick enough 😀

Here for the Wins

Supporters
15 minutes ago, JMarquette said:

There’s some truth to this, but Stroh was objectively horrible. This shouldn’t be hard to admit, yet it is for you. Additionally, your description of how the OL works is inaccurate. It’s a “you’re only as strong as your weakest link” type of mentality. You can have 4 studs, but 1 dud ruins it. There were OL problems outside of LG, but the VAST majority was LG.

Stroh’s overall grade was 59.7.  His pass blocking efficiency was 94.7.  Not good but not horrible.  And since he hasn’t played in 3 years, I’d expect growth out him.  Brooks was 36.6 and sub-90.  Drastic differences.  And I don’t fault Brooks, but that’s the biggest head scratcher as to why he played.

CJ also pointed out in the past week that Brooks allowed pressure on 16% of pass plays whereas all others were 6% or lower.  Only one of those was horrible.  Basically the same as efficiency just calculated differently.

So why am I so adamant in defense?  Because the narrative starts off misleading.

Some plays yes.  Some plays no.  Guys miss blocks all the time.  I’d guess it’s much closer to 0% of plays than 100% that all 5 make a block on a given play.  And you know Arch can dodge one on just about any given play.  And versus OSU we had more yards rushing and yards per carry than anyone.   So that doesn’t really compute as to how he screwed that all up.

Ole Miss.  Of their top 5 Olinemen in terms of snap count, two graded lower than Stroh.  You do not get sub-60s by winning every play.  I’m not arguing Stroh is better but rather all the other points.  On any run, that’s at least two guys losing the play.  It didn’t destroy their run game.

 

 

JMarquette

Supporters
18 minutes ago, Jeff Howe said:

In all seriousness, I don’t think this is something that’s that deep. All I’m saying is that I’m willing to let Seymore get through one practice and figure if/when Hutson will be with the team before concerning myself with scenarios that might not happen. 

I get this, but we should have at least 2 guys who should be in front of him. This goes back to the offseason. I like Siani more than Sprauge, but Guarnera almost felt like he was the piece. 

JMarquette

Supporters
2 minutes ago, Here for the Wins said:

Stroh’s overall grade was 59.7.  His pass blocking efficiency was 94.7.  Not good but not horrible.  And since he hasn’t played in 3 years, I’d expect growth out him.  Brooks was 36.6 and sub-90.  Drastic differences.  And I don’t fault Brooks, but that’s the biggest head scratcher as to why he played.

CJ also pointed out in the past week that Brooks allowed pressure on 16% of pass plays whereas all others were 6% or lower.  Only one of those was horrible.  Basically the same as efficiency just calculated differently.

So why am I so adamant in defense?  Because the narrative starts off misleading.

Some plays yes.  Some plays no.  Guys miss blocks all the time.  I’d guess it’s much closer to 0% of plays than 100% that all 5 make a block on a given play.  And you know Arch can dodge one on just about any given play.  And versus OSU we had more yards rushing and yards per carry than anyone.   So that doesn’t really compute as to how he screwed that all up.

Ole Miss.  Of their top 5 Olinemen in terms of snap count, two graded lower than Stroh.  You do not get sub-60s by winning every play.  I’m not arguing Stroh is better but rather all the other points.  On any run, that’s at least two guys losing the play.  It didn’t destroy their run game.

 

 

I’ll agree Nick Brooks simply wasn’t ready, full stop. That was a flood disasterclass. Them not moving Cole over was baffling to me. You won’t hear any disagreement on Brooks. 

The missing blocks thing is interesting because in a nut shell, you’re right. But outside zone versus power gap is so much different in what needs to work. When you’re running zone, you have to beat someone to a spot, that’s the name of the game. If you don’t get there, the play is blown up if DL are attacking upfield. Power gap is pretty much just big on big double teams, trying to push DL into LB with pulling guards coming into the hole sometimes. You have a little more forgiveness on power schemes because of how the blocking shakes out. With zone, if you have one mess up, especially on the interior, you are looking at 3-4 yard losses. Stroh’s problem was he was too slow, which allowed for more athletic, attacking DL to cross his face and get into the backfield.

This goes back to, I think, a previous point you’ve made about how sark should have known his personnel better. This is true. At the same time, if someone isn’t built for outside zone, then they’ll fail really spectacularly.

 

Here for the Wins

Supporters

I think we’re kicking butt this year.  Just play our game and the offense will hum along.  Almost time to sit back and enjoy.

Hookem72

Supporters

I think the Brooks experiment started off well in the OU game.   He did pretty well against probably the best DLine we faced all year. 

Bunk Moreland

Supporters
5 hours ago, Joe Zura said:

No not at all stating facts. He was awful as a center like beyond awful he was a beyond mid LG and if you try and tell me I’m wrong you will forever be known as sunshine pumper Howe 😭💀

It’s a hypothetical. Why are you assuming that they are going to start Hutson? And even if they do, he was actually pretty average last year. We can win it all if the rest of the line is above average to elite and our LG is average. Indiana had a few average pieces on its OL, including everybody’s favorite Westlake RG.

TexasMDcoach

Supporters

I commend my fellow board mates for the spirited discussion and back and forth.  My take home question is: can this mixture of highly recruited, large humans we have invested serious time recruiting, developing and money be brought together into a cohesive, effective unit by our coaching staff?  All excuses aside, the buck starts and stops with our offensive line coach.   He has a lot of skins on the wall, some good and some bad.  I think we will learn a lot about his capabilities this season because there are no excuses not to succeed now with the level of depth and available pieces he has on the board.  

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Add a comment...

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.