Jump to content
  • I decided to sleep on the bombshell Steve Sarkisian dropped on Thursday, and my thoughts on Will Muschamp’s return to Texas at the expense of Pete Kwiatkowski’s job (with the collateral damage including the end of Duane Akina’s second stint on the Forty Acres) remain largely the same.

    With that said, it’s worth painting the backdrop for Sarkisian’s calculated risk.

    To understand why the burnt orange faithful love Muschamp, one has to understand the situation he inherited in 2008.

    After Greg Robinson and Gene Chizik successfully built on the foundation that Carl Reese built, with the Longhorns fielding elite defenses in 2004 and 2005, the bottom fell out in 2007.

    A defense co-coordinated by Akina and Larry MacDuff is still the second-worst pass defense in school history in yards per game allowed (277.8). The 23 passing touchdowns the unit gave up set an all-time single-season high at Texas until Vance Bedford’s 2015 defense was burned for 24 scores through the air (Todd Orlando's 2018 and 2019 defenses established new marks, surrendering 26 and 28 passing touchdowns, respectively).

    Much like the 2025 squad, the 2007 Longhorns underachieved compared to preseason expectations.

    Texas was in line to play in a BCS bowl until a sloppy performance in College Station ended with a 38-30 loss to Texas A&M in what turned out to be Dennis Franchione’s last game as coach of the Aggies. Mack Brown famously made every starting job open for competition heading into that season’s Holiday Bowl against Arizona State. The Longhorns played largely inspired football, putting forth arguably their best performance of the season in a 52-34 rout of the Sun Devils, a 10-win team under Dennis Erickson that claimed a share of the Pac-10 title.

    Still, Brown shook things up, hiring Muschamp away from Auburn to run the defense. The impact was felt in Muschamp's first spring as Texas played defense with a physical, disciplined and maniacal edge it lacked since winning the national championship in 2005.

    Muschamp did more than field defenses that played with elite levels of effort, intensity and toughness, harkening back to the days of Mike Campbell and Leon Fuller. He changed the culture across the board, which, along with the evolution of Colt McCoy on offense, spearheaded the Longhorns to a 25-2 record (with a Big 12 title, a BCS championship game appearance and a Fiesta Bowl win over Ohio State) during Muschamp’s first two seasons in Austin.

    Fast forward 15 years (the news of Muschamp’s departure to Florida to be Urban Meyer’s successor broke on a massive official visit weekend that coincided with the 2010 Texas team’s postseason banquet), and Sarkisian is in a position where Brown found himself before he hired Muschamp. And it's not where Brown was after he led the program to consecutive 10-3 seasons after the 2005 triumph.

    For Sarkisian, this offseason mirrors where Brown’s tenure stood after the 2003 season, which ended with a disappointing Holiday Bowl loss to Washington State.

    Reese, who was 60 years old at the time, took the Longhorn defense as far as he could. With Mike Leach and Mark Mangino at the forefront of the spread evolution in the Big 12, top-notch offensive minds gradually figured out how to move the ball and score against Reese’s aggressive defenses, which relied on playing high-level man coverage.

    The 59-year-old Kwiatkowski pulled the nose up after a disastrous 2021, leading championship-caliber defenses over the last three seasons. While no guarantee that turning the defense over to Muschamp will get Texas over the hump, the move suggests that Sarkisian made a tough but necessary call.

    If the Longhorns are going to ascend to the next level in Sarkisian's sixth season, changes had to be made.

    Texas has a plethora of potential difference makers along the defensive front who can enhance what Colin Simmons brings to the table. Graceson Littleton and Kade Phillips are foundational pieces in the secondary.

    What the Longhorns can’t have when the dust settles on the 2026 season is the feeling that lingers at the end of Anthony Hill Jr.’s collegiate career. Even though Hill made multiple All-America teams, it’s fair to say that there was meat left on the bone, that Texas didn’t get everything it could out of a game-changing presence in the middle of the defense.

    The 54-year-old Muschamp hasn’t been hanging out on the golf course over the last few college football seasons. After his time as Georgia’s co-defensive coordinator ended following the 2023 season, he spent one more season with the Bulldogs as an analyst, making him familiar with SEC offensive play-callers and schemes and, more importantly, the defensive personnel he’s inheriting upon his return to the Longhorns.

    Texas is rightfully loading up for what’s expected to be Arch Manning’s last hurrah. Getting the most out of Simmons (a potential early first-round NFL draft pick in 2027) is just as important in the Longhorns’ quest to overtake Georgia for the SEC throne on their way to college football’s summit.

    It would be nice to make moves with a multi-year vision for the program in mind. Unfortunately, with the roster volatility that exists in college football, on top of Texas missing the College Football Playoff after two consecutive trips, Sarkisian has to make moves that will maximize the next 12-plus months.

    The Muschamp move is the biggest example so far that the Longhorns are approaching 2026 with the mindset of going big or going home.

    • Hook 'Em 34
    • Thanks 2

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    8 hours ago, Califashorn75 said:

    Sark saw what we all did last year. PK had Simmons chasing tight ends. So dumb. He never challenged the Florida quarterback which cost us a shot at the playoffs. I was tired of the bend but don't break defense. Let's get aggressive like a Tasmanian Devil. Coach Boom will deliver. 

    I guess the offense specifically the OL who didn’t have a pulse until late in the game gets  absolved of any blame for that loss. It was all on PK and the Defense because Simmons was chasing the TE. Give the Offense a pass nice

    • Hook 'Em 1
    9 hours ago, Califashorn75 said:

    Sark saw what we all did last year. PK had Simmons chasing tight ends. So dumb. He never challenged the Florida quarterback which cost us a shot at the playoffs. I was tired of the bend but don't break defense. Let's get aggressive like a Tasmanian Devil. Coach Boom will deliver. 

    It's funny that people hate so much vitriol towards PK now, but if you say anything about Flood or Sark you're literally the devil lol. 

    • Hook 'Em 1

    Bringing Muschamp in was a no brainer for Sark. You have too make the switch. I don’t get why people have to sh*t on PK like he was terrible as a the DC. The guy fielded good defenses on the 40. Sark wanting to field a more attacking aggressive defense shouldn’t take away from the job PK did here on the 40.

    • Hook 'Em 3
    3 minutes ago, Jim said:

    Bringing Muschamp in was a no brainer for Sark. You have too make the switch. I don’t get why people have to sh*t on PK like he was terrible as a the DC. The guy fielded good defenses on the 40. Sark wanting to field a more attacking aggressive defense shouldn’t take away from the job PK did here on the 40.

    Someone said it well before, PK has a very good defense with a very high floor but a limited upside that may not be enough to beat the absolute best necessary to win a Natty.  PKs D has for the most part been an asset the past few years

    • Hook 'Em 1
    2 hours ago, AusMOJO said:

    It's funny that people hate so much vitriol towards PK now, but if you say anything about Flood or Sark you're literally the devil lol. 

    I like Mushcamp glad Sark made the change , but the negativity towards PK isn’t necessarily a good thing. Just like all the negativity towards QE last year wasn’t a good thing.

    • Hook 'Em 1

    Most of us were pleased with Pete, and that is why everyone was so surprised by his firing.  But, Pete had a bad 2021 season, prompting Sark to bring in Gary Patterson for Pete to consult with during the 2022 season.  Following the lessons that Patterson delivered, Pete's level of coaching skyrocketed.  Now Will will have to do what it takes to bring Kirby down a few notches.  

    • Hook 'Em 1
    1 hour ago, Jim said:

    Bringing Muschamp in was a no brainer for Sark. You have too make the switch. I don’t get why people have to sh*t on PK like he was terrible as a the DC. The guy fielded good defenses on the 40. Sark wanting to field a more attacking aggressive defense shouldn’t take away from the job PK did here on the 40.

    People seem to need everything to be black or white, good or bad.  Life is no where near that simple or obvious.

    Coach PK was a fine coach, Coach Muschamp is a fine coach, we made a change for the better.  I agree with you 110%.

    • Hook 'Em 1
    14 hours ago, TXFF said:

    Sark essentially said that WM is a second head coach with full authority and responsibility for the defense. Sark will apply his full attention to the offense rather than having to  keep an eye on the defense which he was apparently having to do with PK. This is huge.

    This is probably my biggest problem with Sark.  His job is to be the HEAD COACH of the University of Texas and be responsible for ALL aspects of the team.  During a game he should be thinking about O, D, and ST, not focusing on which play he should be starting the next offensive series with.  I don’t know that bringing in another DC, no matter how good, solves that fundamental issue   

    If Sark is really ALL IN for ‘26 he needs to do himself and the team a favor and get an OC / Play Caller that he can work with and shift his focus to being the best Head Coach that he can be.  That doesn’t mean he can’t have input on play design and play calling, it just transfers the primary responsibility of that to someone else so that he can manage the game as a whole.  

    10 hours ago, Jarveaux said:

    I like Mushcamp glad Sark made the change , but the negativity towards PK isn’t necessarily a good thing. Just like all the negativity towards QE last year wasn’t a good thing.

    It's even worse on 247sports, people dogging him like crazy. It's absurd to me. 

    • Thanks 1
    10 hours ago, tsip92 said:

    This is probably my biggest problem with Sark.  His job is to be the HEAD COACH of the University of Texas and be responsible for ALL aspects of the team.  During a game he should be thinking about O, D, and ST, not focusing on which play he should be starting the next offensive series with.  I don’t know that bringing in another DC, no matter how good, solves that fundamental issue   

    If Sark is really ALL IN for ‘26 he needs to do himself and the team a favor and get an OC / Play Caller that he can work with and shift his focus to being the best Head Coach that he can be.  That doesn’t mean he can’t have input on play design and play calling, it just transfers the primary responsibility of that to someone else so that he can manage the game as a whole.  

    Doubtful one of the best play callers in college football will give up calling plays.

    11 hours ago, Thorn007 said:

    sark will hire an offensive coordinator after next year if we dont make the playoffs. part deux of save thy Ass. make no mistake coach K is the scapegoat . betcha coach vegetables is happy ou doesnt face coach K again.

    PK was a good DC but if we're being honest he was best suited for a conference like the Big 12. As good as he was we can't forget that Gary Patterson was needed to come in and help him with Quarters coverages in '22. And for as good as PK was, the fact that he couldn’t coordinate the entire defensive was an issue. We had a championship level team in '23 but the fact that he couldn’t marry the front end to the back end which led to a secondary that got torched by damn near everyone cost that team a national championship.

    Not to mention I'm not sure I can recall PK ever trying to make a team  "play left-handed". Our weakness in '23 was our secondary because of him not being able to marry the front end to the back but instead of dropping numbers and daring Washington to run into the likes of Sweat/Murphy/Collins/Broughton we sat back and basically let UW do what they wanted to do which was pick our secondary apart. We seemed to fix the issues in '24 after getting Mukuba but this year the same problem.

    We watched Florida, Kentucky, Mississippi St, Arkansas and Vanderbilt go up and down the field on his defenses this year with little resistance. We were supposed to have the best pass rushing unit in the entire country with Simmons, Hill, Moore, Burke, etc and we got 0 sacks on Sayin while Indiana sacked him 5 or 6 times. Our supposedly vaunted pass rush was nonexistent for like the first half of the year. How was that even possible with all the studs we had on that side of the ball??

    I'm thankful for what PK helped us build to and while I recognize the offense in large parts has been the bigger issue, I can't honestly say the defense hasn't been an issue at times too. I'm excited to see what Muschamp's effect on not just the defense, but the offense is as well.

    • Hook 'Em 1
    20 hours ago, AusMOJO said:

    It's even worse on 247sports, people dogging him like crazy. It's absurd to me. 

    So is Orangebloods Geoff Ketchum . for someone that makes a living off the Texas Longhorns. He sure talks a lot of negativity towards Sark & some of the players. Has an Aggie for a sidekick on his podcast. 

    • Hook 'Em 1



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.