Jump to content

whereiend

Supporters
  • Posts

    97
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by whereiend

  1. Moore explanation does not make sense given all the reps Bolden had in the slot. If he was not injured it was a poor choice to sit him, because we were obviously missing his blocking in the screen game.
  2. Great win IMO. Never thought this game in Fayetteville would be easy.
  3. How is that Quinn's fault? Was a perfect pass. Bolden has to catch it.
  4. Doubtful. One downside of the A&M rivalry returning is that we no longer have the guaranteed Thanksgiving weekend home night game.
  5. It's another game that we only lose if Quinn keeps giving them short fields.
  6. Personally I'll pass on listening to Georgia homers talk about this game
  7. It's clearly not actually an "unreviewable play" given that the ref was (allegedly, but we all know this is true) able to watch the replay on the jumbotron and realize that his call was idiotic. There is no excuse for the ruleset to not include a mechanism of reviewing this play. This rule should be changed tomorrow.
  8. Joel Klatt had a good discussion of this in his podcast. The solution is some kind of review/challenge mechanism to allow an incredibly bad game changing call like this to be overturned. I didn't throw trash on the field but I understand why it happened as that was an absolute disaster of a call. SEC needs to be accountable themselves for unacceptable officiating.
  9. Not saying throwing trash in the field specifically was warranted, but an extreme expression of frustration with the call from both the crowd and Sark was appropriate. The fact that IT WORKED tells you all you need to know. This call was so bad the officials were ashamed to stand by it.
  10. I don't agree at all. It's up to the refs to provide a reasonable standard of officiating. I've never seen DKR erupt over officiating on this level. Is this a culture change or was the call they threatened to make just that bad? IMO it was the latter. I'd be kind of pissed if our crowd took that one lying down.
  11. 🤣 The SEC can F off with that one. Officials should be embarrassed for making the call in the first place. Considering impact and game situation I think it was the single worst call I have seen in almost 30 years of going to UT games. The Charlie Strong OSU situation is the only thing that is even close.
  12. 😂 Yea Ewers was disappointing for sure, but he played better in the second half at least. I think Arch will be much better than Quinn long term, but he probably isn't better today. I guess I'm saying Quinn is who he is. He's not an elite QB and would be a massive bust as a #1 pick. But, he's still good enough to win with if we actually block somebody going forward.
  13. Was surprised how small the line was to begin with. Most of the computer models have TX about 4 points better, which would be 7 points with home field. The line definitely has a human adjustment, which is fair.
  14. Damn, I think about how Mack would have handled this situation and there is a big contrast. Love Sark's attitude here.
  15. MSU runs the Art Briles offense which puts you in a big bind inside of the box. Especially with a running QB. If we can't stop them with 5 really don't want to play Tennessee. OU and Ole Miss also run this offense. Luckily, OU is the only other team on our schedule with this scheme and they aren't very good at it. Overall I think this scheme is hard to stop between the 20s but it can be had in the red zone. If we play Tenn we might have to stop them there because we don't seem to have the DTs to shut the running game down while outnumbered.
  16. I think these days it's especially prudent not to overthink this sort of thing.. NIL allocation is likely a factor and one team here is more desperate to improve the OL.
  17. Tennessee and Ole Miss both run derivatives of the old Art Briles Baylor offense, which is best in class at running up the score on outmatched competition. Of course OU runs this offense as well, so their struggles are not a good sign for them...
  18. Maybe it's semantics but to me busted coverage means someone on defense forgot their assignments and nobody covered the receiver. In this case there was 1-1 coverage that Arch identified and then the defender tripped and fell while the ball was in the air. If he didn't fall it would have been a one on one jump ball that Wingo probably wins.
  19. This wasn't a busted coverage, the defender just fell down. Even if he didn't slip it would have been a completion IMO. Just maybe not a TD.
  20. SA also has Austin beat on the Big Ol' Women front
  21. OU > Michigan based on week one. Michigan looked like Iowa with a worse DC. We'll see what week 2 looks like though...
  22. More like Texas vs. Rice in 2010, if you remember that game. This is not the same Michigan that won the NC last year.
  23. My 2 year old daughter has said multiple times: "I don't want to go to school (daycare)... I want to go to football season."
  24. I much prefer T+1. It's nice separating the holiday from the game day.
  25. Reading anything, but especially social media, requires the reader to make their own judgements about how trustworthy information is. There is no simple model to stop "disinformation" because it's not obvious what is and is not disinformation. Twitter had many demonstrated cases of yesterday's "disinformation" becoming today's facts. Examples: Hunter Biden's laptop, that the COVID vaccine is ineffective at preventing transmission, that COVID likely came from a lab in China, etc. I say this as someone who tends to learn left. We shouldn't be outright censoring speech simply because we happen to think (in our very fallible minds) that the information is incorrect.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.