Curious to get thoughts from Gerry and Bobby. I keep reading speculation about Terry's position as an ATH and most likely to play either TE or on Def, even though it's clear he wants to play on the offensive side of ball. Oregon promising RB. Nebraska offering at WR. Texas and A&M offering at ATH. Given his size, speed and highly productive record as RB and Receiver in HS (1500 combined yards and 20 TDs last year), curious who you'd compare Michael Terry to....
One comparable that came to mind for me was Lil' Jordan Humphrey. LJH stats after junior year in HS weren't nearly as impressive as Terry. Similar build. LJH came into UT at 200 lbs and 6ft 5in. He grew to 6ft 5in and 225lb by junior year. Terry is similar at 6ft 3in and 217lb currently and far more productive in HS. Clocked speeds for both of them would suggest that Terry is more athletic and much faster. Realize Terry is bigger than the typical WRs at UT currently, but LJH caught over 80 passes and nearly 1200 yds his junior year for 3rd most of any WR in UT history and he was only a a 3-star ATH coming out of H.S.
Could Michael Terry end up becoming a better, faster, more athletic version of LJH at Wide Receiver for UT? Is LJH a good comparison or do you have someone else that is better as comparison?
Hook Em!!