-
Snap Judgments: No. 1 Texas ends non-conference play with a sloppy win over UTSA
Arch is sailing the ball very often. Coach has to speed up the decision tree for Arch again and simplify for Arch, just too much thinking. Compared to several QBs in the SEC on TV yesterday, Arch looks pretty average for the majority of the UTSA game.
-
Locking Horns
Bobby schooled CJ on the latest Locking Horns episode narrated and also judged by a mostly impartial Amanda. đThe Big Dog scored a narrow win over CJ using some sage arguments. Regardless of the winner there were some very good points made in this episode. How about that secondary that has shown holes. At the same time there have been stellar performances by the DBs and the pass rush. Texas is 2-0, so Iâll take our defense! Is Arch starting slow? Well, Mosely misses his block on that first play in the OSU game, which the defense saw coming from a mile, and Brown fumbles the ball. A few plays later the âthe immaculate interception â happens, Colman this time. A couple of drives and Wingo whiffs on a perfect touchdown pass, yet another receiver room mistake. Hey there were a lot of amazing plays and recoveries by the same guys which offset things at the end of the game. Texas is 2-0, so Iâll take our offense! What happens when we get in front of a stacked deck of SEC QBs? I donât know either, but I canât wait to find out!đ Letâs limit the miscues, force some on the other team and go win the Natty! This group of people at OTF are having fun and doing a great job at the same time. Think you OTF for all your work and for making 2026-27 a special season, Hookâem!
-
HOOK âEM! Former Pitt LB Rasheem Biles Commits to Texas
Now thatâs a DUDE!!!!!! Hookem
-
Please Pray for Jordan Shipley and His Family
Prayers for Jordan, family and his caretakers.
-
Is Parker Livingstone WR1 at OU
âPeter Parkerâ helped our team this year⌠either way OU still Sucks
-
Rod Baber's 2000 UT Defense (Top Tier Defense on half a tank of gas)
Love it ! Yeah, there is no way youâre leaving Jammer to save on gas. Jammer was Jet fuel!â˝ď¸
-
The Realities of College Football Recruiting and Player Outcomes
Analyzing the Numbers: Does the Math Add Up? Recent years have seen a significant increase in the number of FBS players entering the transfer portal. In 2024, approximately 3,309 players entered, and by 2025, that figure rose to 4,187. Notably, about 30% of those athletes failed to secure a spot on another Division I roster, leaving more than 1,250 players without a team. This raises important questions: Are programs truly restocking their rosters, or just shuffling existing talent among themselves? Challenges of Restocking Through the Transfer Portal Much discussion centers on leveraging the transfer portal to 'restock' teams. However, assembling enough premium talent to genuinely compete for a championship is a complex task. Teams must also synchronize the arrival of such talent with the college progression timelineâfreshman, sophomore, junior, senior. The variety of football schemes, individual program styles, and additional factors such as injuries, personal circumstances, coaching changes, and university budgets further complicate the process. When all these variables are considered, finding talent that truly fits is a daunting challenge, with countless possible outcomes. The Odds of Reaching and Succeeding in the NFL Out of an estimated 73,000 NCAA football players, only 250 to 300 are drafted each year, representing an annual yield of just 0.4%. Approximately 1.6% of NCAA athletes are drafted into the NFL, but if success is defined as playing multiple seasons or becoming a starter, only 1% of NFL players achieve this. The average NFL career lasts 3.3 years, and just 20% of players remain beyond their third season. Recruiting NFL-Caliber Talent: Risks and Realities Each season, the challenge is to attract as many "NFL potential" players as possible, but this comes with risk. Even if a team secures top talent, there is no guarantee of their availability when needed, due to health concerns. Up to 91% of college athletes suffer an injury during their careers, with overuse injuries accounting for nearly 30%. Furthermore, career-ending injuries affect 8â12% of playersâan unsurprising statistic in such a high-contact sport. Competitive Disparity and the Impact on Team Success Given these realities, only a few programs can consistently compete for the most elite players. Teams lacking premium talent often struggle against top-tier opponents. The playoff appearances of JMU and Tulane highlight the importance of coaching, discipline, and culture, but ultimately, physical advantages like mass and velocity cannot be overcome by these factors alone. The Divide Between Programs: "Haves" and "Have Nots" The landscape is increasingly split between well-resourced programs and those without. Even major conferences such as the Big Ten, SEC, and ACC have several teams that fall short of the powerhouses. The group of "haves" is limited to about 20 schools with sufficient resources. Division II football is poised for a shift away from its traditional model. The transfer portal now resembles free agency in professional sports, offering valuable lessons in player movement and team building. Economic Sustainability: Is the Current Model Viable? College footballâs economics need not be entirely linked to the NFL and its 32 franchises, but the current approach is unsustainable. The numbers simply do not support the idea that enough players are available to maintain championship-level competition across the board. The math, when it comes to recruiting and retaining the necessary talent, just doesnât add up.
BRo
Supporters
-
Joined
-
Last visited