All Activity

Yes, yes they do!

I’m going to say that zero of the top three will be one of the last four teams in Omaha.

Who’s ready for round two of a seven hour game? In all seriousness, that’s a phenomenal regional. Very rewarding. Texas needs to get healthy.

"OTF: Off the Rails" is coming when I get enough clips. Stay tuned!

The one NBA game I went to…. I saw OKC wipe the floor with SA. OKC wins. My middle son is happy. CJ cries. All is well in the world.

NHL Playoffs

Oh interesting, I wouldn’t know the first thing about the court system, so I didn’t realize it would be in federal court and not state court. Is that also how it works when players ask for another year of eligibility? Does that go through federal court too, or state court?

It’s just Matthew producing the live shows at night without a shirt on 😭

The gremlin finally shows himself 🖕🏼😭😭

OnlyTexasFans was right there...

The integrity of the game is on the line if he’s allowed to play. It sets a bad precedent if he’s allowed to play as it has far reaching implications to professional and college sports. Given the number of games this Sorsby bet on he obviously has a gambling issue. I watched the Cincinnati game vs BYU last year. The guy made some bad interceptions. Makes me wonder if the guy had money on the game.

In several different parts, not one whole article though. Welcome to the board! Keep any ideas coming and please join in the convo with others.

We’ve been on a historic run lately.

There's no ill will on my end, so no truce needed.

This is a federal court, not a state court in which the judge is elected. Even if the judge miraculously made the incorrect ruling, it would immediately be appealed to the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans (the appellant court that has jurisdiction of Texas in federal court) and overturned. Who the lawyer is doesn't matter in this case. There's no legal ground or precedent for Sorsby to legitimately argue. Most lawyers will take a case to make money even if they know they can't win.

I 100-percent agree with the headline of this post.

Oh, I fully agree with you. But like Bobby somewhat pointed out a few weeks ago about the lawyer taking the case — the guy is a killer in the courtroom. He’s not going to take a case unless he sees a path to win. And when he was betting on his own team in 2022, he wasn’t even legally allowed to gamble. I know the courts are supposed to be unbiased, but come on — a judge in Lubbock will be overseeing the injunction. I could definitely see it swinging Sorsby’s way. But at the same time, this sure seems like it should be a fairly open-and-shut case based on the precedents already set in previous rulings, like the Iowa State players’ betting scandal.

I’ll also rip on the streams, should I be allowed to co-host. Mainly baseball and college football.

Video clips of all of Rod B's "Pause" moments.

I doubt this is true. Every sports league, conference, association, whatever you call it, has rules against players gambling. This is not about the right to make money like all the other cases the NCAA has lost.

Karen Key Largo got that gallon.

I hope I’m wrong, but I think Sorsby will end up winning this in court and play the entire season for Tech.

New here and just taking in what you have. Have you ever done a recap of last year's games (with the knowledge you have now) and did an in-depth analysis of how some of the new players / recruits / coaches could improve performance or maybe change the outcome of the games?

They're doing what any school would do after a $6M investment gone wrong.