All Activity
- Past hour
-
Solid cliff notes. Haha. That's exactly what I've read as well. The only thing I'd add is Kessler bringing up the comparison to a volleyball coach who allegedly bet $350,000 and only received a 30% suspension, then trying to equate that to Sorsby's case, which is pretty laughable.
-
I read some of the court reporting from this morning and Sorsby/Tech have no scrooples. Their arguments; he is really sorry, he got help voluntarily (he didnt until he got caught), he will fail without football (ignoring the fsct he has failed with football already), ncaa doesnt care about his mental health by wanting to punish him, is gambling really that bad?, looka t all these letters from the rehab that say he has been the best patient ever and all risk is gone (tech of course didnt pay for any of the statements). I wonder if there will be a journalist brave enough to ask Joey how it feels to sell your morals for trying to win games.
-
Doubtful. District court judges can't set precedent, so there is no reason to expand much.
-
Btw, district court judges don’t get to draft significant opinions, so I bet this guy will write a novel
-
DellB joined the community
-
From what I have read, they would expect a ruling sooner than that.
-
Texas MBB No. 9 in latest ESPN way-too-early rankings
Hank South replied to Hank South's topic in On Texas Football Forum
ESPN's (as well as anybody paying attention) projected starting lineup: Isaiah Johnson (16.9 PPG at Colorado) Austin Goosby (No. 20 in SC Next 100) Elyjah Freeman (9.2 PPG at Auburn) David Punch (14.1 PPG at TCU) Matas Vokietaitis (15.7 PPG) -
Lawyers out there: how long would you expect the Sorsby hearing to last before the judge issues a ruling? I know Kessler is asking for a decision before June 15. Is there any realistic chance it actually takes that long, or would you expect a ruling much sooner?