connorkp23 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 40 minutes ago, Here for the Wins said: Texas led Vandy for 59:45 of the game. For 55 minutes they couldn’t even tie the game. They only had 4 snaps in the entire game to tie it up. If they call the interference on the overturned TD, there’s a good chance we win by 2-3 scores. Could be wrong, but sort of sounds like he misspoke. Given he was comparing it to the Alabama game. Could be wrong, and if so: wow. Quote
Here for the Wins Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 3 minutes ago, connorkp23 said: Could be wrong, but sort of sounds like he misspoke. Given he was comparing it to the Alabama game. Could be wrong, and if so: wow. He may not be quite prepared for the pressure. Really, he can’t win no matter what he does. i do not see the justification for having Ole Miss in front of the Aggies. That could be incredibly significant in that one gets the 11 seed the other gets the 10. I’m not completely certain that Oregon deserves it either. But pushing the Aggies down to 7 and Vandy at 14 diminishes those two wins slightly. There is bad information out there. Saban just said Miami kicked Notre dames ass. Kicked the game winner with 1 minute left. They outgained them by 25 yards. Miami got two turnovers in scoring position. They got 1 first down and 3 points. For a game at home, that’s not ass kicking. But the world views it as such now. 1 Quote
FootLaw Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 18 hours ago, CHorn427 said: Said Texas was the only team that lost to a team that hadn’t been ranked in the CFP committee’s rankings. And used it as a major justification point for Texas’ exclusion. This is a flat out lie. Bama lost to FSU, that had never been in the committee’s rankings AND was proven on the field to be a worse team than Florida. Yurachek is Arkansas’ AD. No anti-Texas bias there, I’m sure! That nice little tidy statistic is a flat out lie. Texas should honestly demand that Yurachek make a public statement correcting his initial statement to Texas was one of TWO teams that lost to a CFP unranked team. It actually drastically changes the picture. Not saying it gets Texas in, or that Texas should be in. But the CFP chair should NOT!!! be issuing untruthful statements about Texas. And if they are truly misinterpreting and misrepresenting data this badly, those committee members should be replaced. I'll keep screaming from the rooftops that this system will remain broken so long as ADs make up the committee. Needs to be retired coaches or football media members only. Going to 16 helps but doesn't solve the main issue. 1 Quote
CoachBobbyFinstock Posted 51 minutes ago Posted 51 minutes ago 6 hours ago, AusMOJO said: Why is the AD of a school, that hates Texas, allowed to make statements like this about Texas with no one doing any actual fact checking and calling him out? There are like 3 former and current AD’s that were at Arkansas on this committee. Bias is alive and well. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.