Nathan B Posted Monday at 03:39 AM Posted Monday at 03:39 AM Find a 3 and D wing and you’re one of early top 5 teams. 5 Quote
TheContractor12 Posted Monday at 04:08 AM Posted Monday at 04:08 AM 2 hours ago, Gerry Hamilton said: Texas will be a top 10 ranked team preseason ... mark this one. They are far from done call your shot, Swain back? I think so. 1 Quote
Dday Posted Monday at 04:11 AM Posted Monday at 04:11 AM I assume we need a back up point guard. Quote
Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted Monday at 04:14 AM Moderators Posted Monday at 04:14 AM 3 minutes ago, TheContractor12 said: call your shot, Swain back? I think so. No way to know that right now He’s slightly ascending in mocks ahead of combine The NBA is the dream, and he’s got legit shot to stay in Talked to NBA scout of a team that won’t draft him (not position of need) over the weekend … that franchise has him as late first rounder right now. We shall see 4 Quote
Nathan B Posted Monday at 04:21 AM Posted Monday at 04:21 AM Both of the new additions have great free throw rates as well, which will be huge with Matas already on the team. 1 Quote
ryanN Posted Monday at 04:36 AM Posted Monday at 04:36 AM @Gerry Hamilton maybe Bryce Lindsay comes over finally he can be that guard off the bench with experience that can shoot 1 Quote
Caden Kuykendall Posted Monday at 05:17 AM Posted Monday at 05:17 AM 58 minutes ago, Gerry Hamilton said: No way to know that right now He’s slightly ascending in mocks ahead of combine The NBA is the dream, and he’s got legit shot to stay in Talked to NBA scout of a team that won’t draft him (not position of need) over the weekend … that franchise has him as late first rounder right now. We shall see I feel like if he came back for another year, he would be an automatic top 20 pick. Just cause this draft is so deep compared to next year. 1 Quote
Longhorn nation Posted Monday at 05:21 AM Posted Monday at 05:21 AM For the small forward position are we going after a big name or someone that can just play there role because of where we are from a NIL standpoint. Quote
Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted Monday at 09:15 AM Moderators Posted Monday at 09:15 AM 3 hours ago, Longhorn nation said: For the small forward position are we going after a big name or someone that can just play there role because of where we are from a NIL standpoint. Maybe be a combo forward type over small forward Looking at different options for best fit and need 2 Quote
817 Boxing B Posted Monday at 10:17 AM Posted Monday at 10:17 AM 6 hours ago, TheContractor12 said: call your shot, Swain back? I think so. I hope so. Bro would end up spending his 1st 2 years in the NBA being shipped back and forth from the end of somebody's bench to the D league and the whole time... he will be kicking himself in the ass because he could've been getting top notch NIL and chilling in Austin with an absolute SQUAD! 1 Quote
ClubWhatever Posted Monday at 10:47 AM Posted Monday at 10:47 AM Swain: 15% chance to return. Drafted at any spot = gone. Quote
pinkman_90 Posted Monday at 10:58 AM Posted Monday at 10:58 AM 35 minutes ago, 817 Boxing B said: I hope so. Bro would end up spending his 1st 2 years in the NBA being shipped back and forth from the end of somebody's bench to the D league and the whole time... he will be kicking himself in the ass because he could've been getting top notch NIL and chilling in Austin with an absolute SQUAD! Say he goes between picks 20-30, that’s somewhere between 2.5-3.2 million first year salary in NBA. I don’t know what he’d be making at Texas but I’m guessing somewhere in that range for NIL. So then how much can his draft stock actually improve if he came back? I don’t think that much. Max out in the mid-teens probably. I am skeptical of when teams “guarantee” players they will pick them, but for Swain if thinks he’s locked in to the late first, it probably doesn’t make sense to come back. Quote
MarkInAustin Posted Monday at 12:03 PM Posted Monday at 12:03 PM The personal finance decisions for a 21 YO star athlete are not simple. First, it would be smart to delete his "wants" from the decision tree and concentrate on his "needs." ---------- Second, there is the valuation issue, which turns on net rather than gross numbers. For example, income in Texas is worth much more than in states with significant income taxation. Cost of living in metro NYC or LA or SF or DC is a six figure differential over having room and board provided in Austin. Offsetting endorsement deals in LA or NYC might be unlikely for most. --------- Third, there are longer term considerations. Residual benefits of a degree now vs. a degree later, or no degree at all, are measurable to an analyst and of greater or lesser meaning to a future pro depending on his long term name value; e.g., KD and VY have extraordinary long term name value that makes a degree have virtually no long term income value in comparison. Weigh the depth of the current draft and one a year later against the likelihood of reaching a lucrative second contract a year earlier. I think the chance of a career ending injury would not be weighed because it may have the same long term effect whether sustained under a lucrative NIL deal or under a first year professional contract - but insurance issues and CBA health care provisions may make weighing injury potential another variable. ---------- Two and three are tricky issues for most, but standard fare for a financial advisor. The first issue is the most pressing: does the player NEED the most dollars today? Is his family comfortable or living paycheck to paycheck? If the current need is there the third issue, long term consequences, falls out of the matrix. Only net current value need be considered. 1 Quote
Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted Monday at 12:20 PM Moderators Posted Monday at 12:20 PM 13 minutes ago, MarkInAustin said: The personal finance decisions for a 21 YO star athlete are not simple. First, it would be smart to delete his "wants" from the decision tree and concentrate on his "needs." ---------- Second, there is the valuation issue, which turns on net rather than gross numbers. For example, income in Texas is worth much more than in states with significant income taxation. Cost of living in metro NYC or LA or SF or DC is a six figure differential over having room and board provided in Austin. Offsetting endorsement deals in LA or NYC might be unlikely for most. --------- Third, there are longer term considerations. Residual benefits of a degree now vs. a degree later, or no degree at all, are measurable to an analyst and of greater or lesser meaning to a future pro depending on his long term name value; e.g., KD and VY have extraordinary long term name value that makes a degree have virtually no long term income value in comparison. Weigh the depth of the current draft and one a year later against the likelihood of reaching a lucrative second contract a year earlier. I think the chance of a career ending injury would not be weighed because it may have the same long term effect whether sustained under a lucrative NIL deal or under a first year professional contract - but insurance issues and CBA health care provisions may make weighing injury potential another variable. ---------- Two and three are tricky issues for most, but standard fare for a financial advisor. The first issue is the most pressing: does the player NEED the most dollars today? Is his family comfortable or living paycheck to paycheck? If the current need is there the third issue, long term consequences, falls out of the matrix. Only net current value need be considered. The injury part is interesting. I've said a couple of times ... he had a non-contact knee injury scare around practice two or three this year. The initial reaction coming out of the building was they feared he could have season ending. It obviously wasn't, and was more of a scare. He has one more year of college hoops, so around 3 mill left while also taking into account what injury could do to draft stock. If you go in first round, 6-7 mill guaranteed and likely 13-15 on first contract. 4 Quote
HookemChappy Posted Monday at 12:22 PM Posted Monday at 12:22 PM Who will be the Weaver type player on this team? Quote
Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted Monday at 12:30 PM Moderators Posted Monday at 12:30 PM 5 minutes ago, HookemChappy said: Who will be the Weaver type player on this team? Not a knock on Weaver, but Texas wants a different type of player long term. Teams didn't guard Weaver on the offensive end in the NCAA Tournament. Texas can't have that and get where they want to ultimately go. Texas has to have five players on the court that teams have to defend. 4 Quote
JMarquette Posted Monday at 12:42 PM Posted Monday at 12:42 PM 11 minutes ago, Gerry Hamilton said: Not a knock on Weaver, but Texas wants a different type of player long term. Teams didn't guard Weaver on the offensive end in the NCAA Tournament. Texas can't have that and get where they want to ultimately go. Texas has to have five players on the court that teams have to defend. Would love someone whose game is modeled after Tony Allen. Great defense with some 3-point capability. Quote
SarkFiction Posted Monday at 03:04 PM Posted Monday at 03:04 PM 12 hours ago, Jordan91 said: I think that team is really going to be remembered for starting this. They might be, but I think a lot of it also has to do with boosters seeing Michigan, also a football school, winning it in such short succession with Dusty May and an a team whose starters were all tansfers. Quote
BabyBevo Posted Monday at 03:09 PM Posted Monday at 03:09 PM @Gerry Hamiltonwhat is the expectation or Goosby’s 3 point percentage in your opinion? Quote
Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted Monday at 03:20 PM Moderators Posted Monday at 03:20 PM 14 minutes ago, SarkFiction said: They might be, but I think a lot of it also has to do with boosters seeing Michigan, also a football school, winning it in such short succession with Dusty May and an a team whose starters were all tansfers. And he signed 5 HS kids this class. These guys still want and need to have HS development players More roster balance over time 2 Quote
Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted Monday at 03:21 PM Moderators Posted Monday at 03:21 PM 11 minutes ago, BabyBevo said: @Gerry Hamiltonwhat is the expectation or Goosby’s 3 point percentage in your opinion? 34-35% range second half of season after he gets acclimated Quote
davisxcole Posted Monday at 03:32 PM Posted Monday at 03:32 PM Just now, davisxcole said: I hate chat gpt all I said was to put the “in miller we trust” and they changed his face and put digi camo 😂 Quote
TexasBurntToast Posted Wednesday at 01:39 PM Posted Wednesday at 01:39 PM On 4/12/2026 at 9:58 PM, Gerry Hamilton said: I would say this again … probably need to start leaving the big name guys left in the portal alone. All the names still being thrown around would be a talent collection without the minutes to go round and a 20+ mill team (certainly not happening at Texas) Texas has four starters plus three guys that will factor in different roles already. It’s all fits for rounding out team now … May only be 2-3 guys left now (depending on what Swain ends up doing). those are… 1. guard that is a shot maker/perimeter threat with enough size Likely - big combo forward that can shoot it well enough, and provide some versatility from a lineup perspective probably - backup center That will get Texas to 10. Then you see what happens with Swain first before any other moves Hey Gerry- does Kameron Taylor fit the mold for the guard/forward type (Swain replacement) Texas may be looking for? Is he a consideration for Texas? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.