Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, GoHorns1 said:

English please.

I believe the argument is Nil deals signed through learfield would not have to go through clearinghouse for approval. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Supporters
Posted
4 hours ago, Lnghrn said:

I believe the argument is Nil deals signed through learfield would not have to go through clearinghouse for approval. 

Yep. thanks Lnghrn 

Posted

Read in an article that  711 deals worth 29 million have been reviewed but not cleared yet.  May 27 hearing with same judge that oversaw the Settlement. Gonna get interesting again . This Clearinghouse won't be around much longer imo , will see though!

Posted

Is the House settlement and its clearinghouse even relevant at this point?  Several schools never agreed to the settlement and likely never will.  That’s why we are heading to more and more of a world of the have and have nots.  Change is coming in 2030-31 when the TV contracts expire, because the current model is unsustainable to most of the power conference schools (mostly outside the SEC).

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.