Supporters Hank South Posted 7 hours ago Author Supporters Posted 7 hours ago In case you didn't know, Learfield and Texas are partnered together. 2 Quote
.45s Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago It's all in the four corners of the document. Let's see what the court has to say. Quote
Lnghrn Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 6 minutes ago, GoHorns1 said: English please. I believe the argument is Nil deals signed through learfield would not have to go through clearinghouse for approval. 2 1 Quote
GoHorns1 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Lnghrn said: I believe the argument is Nil deals signed through learfield would not have to go through clearinghouse for approval. Thanks Quote
Supporters Hank South Posted 2 hours ago Author Supporters Posted 2 hours ago 4 hours ago, Lnghrn said: I believe the argument is Nil deals signed through learfield would not have to go through clearinghouse for approval. Yep. thanks Lnghrn Quote
TTown Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Read in an article that 711 deals worth 29 million have been reviewed but not cleared yet. May 27 hearing with same judge that oversaw the Settlement. Gonna get interesting again . This Clearinghouse won't be around much longer imo , will see though! Quote
jhookem91 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Is the House settlement and its clearinghouse even relevant at this point? Several schools never agreed to the settlement and likely never will. That’s why we are heading to more and more of a world of the have and have nots. Change is coming in 2030-31 when the TV contracts expire, because the current model is unsustainable to most of the power conference schools (mostly outside the SEC). Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.