Moderators CJ Vogel Posted 12 minutes ago Moderators Posted 12 minutes ago Saw this on r/CFB this morning and figured I would share it with the good folks of OTF. Is Nebraska still considered to be a blue blood in your eyes? Couple of Nebraska facts: – Last National Title: 1997 – Last Conference Title: 1999 – Ten win seasons since 2000: 6 – Average wins in the last decade: 4.7 per season – Nebraska hasn't won eight games in a single season since 2016. – Nebraska hasn't won ten games in a single season since 2012. – 51–64 overall record in the last ten years. Have not finished ranked in the top 25 for a single season. Of course the history is there, but the program could have completely wrapped up after 2000 and the trophy case would not have changed a single bit. So, what say you? Nebraska still belong in the blue blood conversation? 2 Quote
harveycmd Posted 9 minutes ago Posted 9 minutes ago They are as much of a blue blood as the criminal sooners or Notre Dame altar boys. Quote
Deej Posted 6 minutes ago Posted 6 minutes ago They are 2-34 against top 25 teams in the CFP era. They are Purdue with a better history 1 Quote
Bunk Moreland Posted 6 minutes ago Posted 6 minutes ago I’m not even sure I consider OU a blue blood anymore, so no. 1 Quote
Moderators CJ Vogel Posted 5 minutes ago Author Moderators Posted 5 minutes ago Just now, Bunk Moreland said: I’m not even sure I consider OU a blue blood anymore, so no. Now that's a bit bold. I certainly would have OU in my blue blood class. Wasn't about six years ago they had won seven straight conference titles 1 Quote
LonghornFan4Ever Posted 5 minutes ago Posted 5 minutes ago I would say yes because I think you can't lose blueblood status once you're considered one. But another decade similar to the one they just had and it's safe to say they will never return to being a perennial powerhouse like Minnesota football pre-1960, Indiana men's basketball, Southern Cal baseball, etc. Maybe they find a Curt Cignetti 2.0 to revive their program down the road, so I gonna count them out completely. 1 Quote
Bobby Burton Posted 2 minutes ago Posted 2 minutes ago Their move to the Big 10 was super ill-conceived. Much like Arkansas' early move to the SEC. Both schools became outposts for their new conferences. It hasn't worked for Nebraska and Arkansas has never been the same since. Quote
harveycmd Posted 2 minutes ago Posted 2 minutes ago Of the eight blue blood football programs (Alabama, Ohio State, Texas, USC, Michigan, Criminal Sooners, Notre Dame and Nebraska), only the criminals, altar boys and corn guys haven't won a title in the last twenty-five years. That's why Nebraska is just as much of a blue blood as the other two. 1 Quote
Bobby Burton Posted 1 minute ago Posted 1 minute ago 8 minutes ago, CJ Vogel said: So not A&M, clearly. 1 Quote
Moderators Hank South Posted 1 minute ago Moderators Posted 1 minute ago Think you have to from a historically elite standpoint. Top 3 helmet in CFB too imo Quote
Bobby Burton Posted just now Posted just now 4 minutes ago, LonghornFan4Ever said: I would say yes because I think you can't lose blueblood status once you're considered one. But another decade similar to the one they just had and it's safe to say they will never return to being a perennial powerhouse like Minnesota football pre-1960, Indiana men's basketball, Southern Cal baseball, etc. Maybe they find a Curt Cignetti 2.0 to revive their program down the road, so I gonna count them out completely. I like that you mentioned Minnesota football there as a comparison. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.